Cited by 9Motor Control and AdaptationNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesMental Health and Psychiatry

Motor actions across psychiatric disorders: a research domain criteria (RDoC) perspective

Open access
Osborne, K. Juston, Walther, Sebastian, Mittal, Vijay A.·2024·Clinical Psychology Review

Abstract

The motor system is critical for understanding the pathophysiology and treatment of mental illness. Abnormalities in the processes that allow us to plan and execute movement in a goal-directed, context-appropriate manner (i.e., motor actions) are especially central to clinical motor research. Within this context, the NIMH Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework now includes a Motor Actions construct within the recently incorporated Sensorimotor Systems Domain, providing a useful framework for conducting research on motor action processes. However, there is limited available resources for understanding or implementing this framework. We address this gap by providing a comprehensive critical review and conceptual integration of the current clinical literature on the subconstructs comprising the Motor Actions construct. This includes a detailed discussion of each Motor Action subconstruct (e.g., action planning/execution) and its measurement across different units of analysis (e.g., molecules to behavior), the temporal and conceptual relationships among the Motor Action subconstructs (and other relevant RDoC domain constructs), and how abnormalities in these Motor Action subconstructs manifest in mental illness. Together, the review illustrates how motor system dysfunction is implicated in the pathophysiology of many psychiatric conditions and demonstrates shared and distinct mechanisms that may account for similar manifestations of motor abnormalities across disorders.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.cpr.2024.102511

Cites

312 of 312 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The National Institute for Mental Health (NIMH), in its Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework matrix, has recently proposed the incorporation of a new Sensorimotor Systems domain, composed of subconstructs such as Motor Actions, Agency and Ownership and Habits.

    “The National Institute for Mental Health (NIMH), in its Research Domain Criteria (RDoC) framework matrix [76 -79], has recently proposed the incorporation of a new Sensorimotor Systems domain, composed of sub­ constructs such as Motor Actions, Agency and Ownership and Habits [80 -82]”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 313 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Osborne, K. J., Walther, S., & Mittal, V. A.
Affiliations
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Universitätsklinikum Würzburg (DE)
Corresponding author
Osborne, K. Juston
Venue
Clinical Psychology Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2024-12
Volume
114
Pages
102511
ISSN
0272-7358 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4403907212
Cited by
9
References
313
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 4
FWCI
0.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Clinical Psychology Review (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (1F31MH123121-01A1, 5T32MH100019\u201305)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Motor Control and Adaptation
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
Keywords
motor action, Research Domain Criteria, mental illness, action planning, motor execution, sensorimotor system
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Motor Activity, National Institute of Mental Health (U.S.), United States

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review