Cited by 92Traumatic Brain Injury ResearchSports injuries and preventionTraumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances

Sports-related brain injury in the general population: an epidemiological study

Open access
Theadom, Alice, Starkey, Nicola J., Dowell, Tony, Hume, Patria A., Kahan, Michael, McPherson, Kathryn, Feigin, Valery·2014·Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport

Abstract

Objectives To determine the incidence, nature and severity of all sports-related brain injuries in the general population.Design Population-based epidemiological incidence study.Methods Data on all traumatic brain injury events sustained during a sports-related activity were extracted from a dataset of all new traumatic brain injury cases (both fatal and non-fatal), identified over a one-year period in the Hamilton and Waikato districts of New Zealand. Prospective and retrospective case ascertainment methods from multiple sources were used. All age groups and levels of traumatic brain injury severity were included. Details of the registering injuries and recurrent injuries sustained over the subsequent year were obtained through medical/accident records and assessment interviews with participants.Results Of 1369 incident traumatic brain injury cases, 291 were identified as being sustained during a sports-related activity (21% of all traumatic brain injuries) equating to an incidence rate of 170 per 100,000 of the general population. Recurrent injuries occurred more frequently in adults (11%) than children (5%). Of the sports-related injuries 46% were classified as mild with a high risk of complications. Injuries were most frequently sustained during rugby, cycling and equestrian activities. It was revealed that up to 19% of traumatic brain injuries were not recorded in medical notes.Conclusions Given the high incidence of new and recurrent traumatic brain injury and the high risk of complications following injury, further sport specific injury prevention strategies are urgently needed to reduce the impact of traumatic brain injury and facilitate safer engagement in sports activities. The high levels of 'missed' traumatic brain injuries, highlights the importance in raising awareness of traumatic brain injury during sports-related activity in the general population.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsams.2014.02.001

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Most sports-related injuries were classified as mild TBI (46%) with a high risk of complications, including mainly cognitive dysfunction.

    “Most sports-related injuries were classified as mild TBI (46%) with a high risk of complications, including mainly cognitive dysfunction (34).”

    From Pituitary Dysfunction After Traumatic Brain Injury: A Clinical and Pathophysiological Approach (2015) · cites this paper as [34]

    The Discussion (p. 10) says 98% of sports-related TBIs were classified as mild, while 46% of injuries were identified as having a high risk of further complications. The claim conflates those figures and adds that complications were mainly cognitive dysfunction; the Discussion instead gives intracranial lesions as an example and does not establish cognitive dysfunction as the main complication. (LLM, conf=0.91)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [27]27. King D, Hume PA, Clark T. First-aid concussion knowledge of rugby league team management, administrators and officials in New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Sports Medicine 2010;37(2):56-68.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Theadom, A., Starkey, N. J., Dowell, T., Hume, P. A., Kahan, M., McPherson, K., & Feigin, V.
Affiliations
  • Auckland University of Technology (NZ)
  • University of Waikato (NZ)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
Corresponding author
Theadom, Alice
Venue
Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2014-11
Volume
17
Issue
6
Pages
591-596
ISSN
1440-2440 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2064933785
Cited by
92
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4
FWCI
3.53
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of science and medicine in sport (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Commons (University of Waikato) (submittedVersion)
  • ResearchSpace (University of Auckland) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Health Research Council of New Zealand
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Traumatic Brain Injury Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Orthopedics and Sports Medicine › Sports injuries and prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances
Keywords
sports-related brain injury, traumatic brain injury, incidence, injury severity, injury recurrence, missed injuries, rugby, cycling, equestrian, injury prevention, general population
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Athletic Injuries, Brain Injuries, Child, Female, Humans, Male, New Zealand, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review