Substance use recovery outcomes among a cohort of youth participating in a mobile-based texting aftercare pilot program
Open accessAbstract
Project ESQYIR (Educating & Supporting inquisitive Youth in Recovery) is a pilot study examining the feasibility of a 12-week mobile-based aftercare intervention for youth (ages 12 to 24) transitioning out of community-based substance abuse treatment programs. From January 2012 through July 2013, a total of 80 youth were recruited from outpatient and residential treatment programs, geographically dispersed throughout Los Angeles County, California. Results revealed that youth who participated in the texting mobile pilot intervention were significantly less likely to relapse to their primary compared to the aftercare as usual control condition (OR = 0.52, p = 0.002) over time (from baseline throughout the 12-week aftercare pilot program to a 90-day follow-up). Participants in the texting aftercare pilot program also reported significantly less substance use problem severity (β = −0.46, p = .03) and were more likely to participate in extracurricular recovery behaviors (β = 1.63, p = .03) compared to participants in the standard aftercare group. Collectively, findings from this pilot aftercare study suggest that mobile texting could provide a feasible way to engage youth in recovery after substance abuse treatment to aid with reducing relapse and promoting lifestyle behavior change.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
Project ESQYIR was a 12-week randomized pilot of mobile texting aftercare for youth completing substance abuse treatment in Los Angeles County. Compared with aftercare as usual, texting participants had lower odds of relapse to their primary drug and less substance use problem severity, and reported more extracurricular recovery behaviors.
Key findings
- Youth in the texting intervention were significantly less likely to relapse to their primary drug over time than aftercare-as-usual controls, based on urinalysis: OR = 0.52, p = 0.002.
- Texting participants showed significantly less substance use problem severity over time: β = −0.46, p = .03; baseline severity was comparable between conditions (p = .13), but intervention participants decreased while controls increased (baseline M = 0.73 vs. 0.39; discharge M = 0.49 vs. 1.03; 90-day M = 0.54 vs. 1.08).
- Texting participants were significantly more likely to participate in extracurricular recovery behaviors over time: β = 1.63, p = .03; at discharge they averaged 18.0 days vs. 10.1 days for controls, and at 90-day follow-up 14.5 vs. 12.1 days.
- 12-step participation decreased overall (β = −3.09, p < .001) with no significant condition-by-time difference (β = 2.79, p > .05); intervention participants had higher 12-step participation at discharge (8.9 vs. 2.9 days, p = .003), but this effect disappeared at 90-day follow-up (7.0 vs. 4.6 days, p = .31). Younger age was associated with higher odds of relapse (OR = 0.89, p = 0.03).
Methods
- Randomized controlled pilot trial of Project ESQYIR: 80 youth recruited January 2012–July 2013 from three outpatient and three residential community-based substance abuse programs in Los Angeles County, California. Inclusion criteria included ages 12–25, completing substance abuse treatment, owning an SMS-capable cell phone, willingness to comply with procedures, and parental consent if under 18.
- Participants were assigned to a 12-week mobile texting aftercare intervention or aftercare as usual. The intervention included daily self-monitoring texts with automated feedback, a daily wellness recovery tip, and weekend substance abuse education and social support resource texts; both conditions received two monthly recovery monitoring telephone calls.
- Assessments occurred at baseline, monthly during the program, discharge, and 90-day follow-up. Measures included urinalysis for methamphetamine/amphetamines, cocaine, opiates, marijuana, and benzodiazepines; T-ASI; GAIN; and BAM. Analyses used chi-square and t-tests, mixed-effects repeated measures, GEE logistic regression, and Bonferroni adjustments with p < .05.
Limitations
- The paper states that caution is needed because this was a pilot study; participants self-selected into the study and may not generalize to other youth; some data were self-reported and subject to over- or under-reporting; and the study did not examine mental health status or criminal justice system issues.
- The text also makes evident that the aftercare-as-usual control was not standardized or monitored for fidelity, and the sample was predominantly outpatient, male, and primarily reporting marijuana or methamphetamine as their primary drug.
- Additional evident limitations include the small pilot sample, the 90-day follow-up period, and reliance on participants’ personal mobile phones for texting, though the paper notes no refusals due to this and that almost all youth reported unlimited free texting plans.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 53 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingown data
Youth in the texting aftercare pilot reported significantly lower substance use problem severity than those in standard aftercare (β=-0.46, p=.03).
“Participants in the texting aftercare pilot program also reported significantly less substance use problem severity (β = −0.46, p = .03)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Youth in the texting aftercare pilot showed greater participation in extracurricular recovery behaviors than those in standard aftercare (β=1.63, p=.03).
“were more likely to participate in extracurricular recovery behaviors (β = 1.63, p = .03) compared to participants in the standard aftercare group.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
In a pilot randomized trial of 80 youth, those in the mobile texting aftercare condition had significantly lower odds of relapsing to their primary substance than those in aftercare as usual, across the 12-week program and 90-day follow-up (OR=0.52, p=0.002).
“Results revealed that youth who participated in the texting mobile pilot intervention were significantly less likely to relapse to their primary compared to the aftercare as usual control condition (OR = 0.52, p = 0.002) over time (from baseline throughout the 12-week aftercare pilot program to a 90-day follow-up).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
At 90-day follow-up, the difference between intervention and control participants in 12-step meeting days was not significant (7.0 ± 9.5 vs. 4.6 ± 9.2, p = .31).
“Specifically, at 90 day follow-up, intervention participants averaged 7.0 days (SD = 9.5) of 12-step meetings compared to 4.6 days (SD = 9.2) among control participants (p = .31).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
At discharge, intervention participants had significantly more days of 12-step meeting participation than control participants (M = 8.9 ± 9.9 vs. 2.9 ± 6.6, p = .003).
“intervention participants were significantly more likely to have higher participation in 12-step meetings (M = 8.9 days ± 9.9) than control participants (M = 2.9 days ± 6.6) at discharge (t = −2.9996, df = 67, p = .003)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Findingown data
In the pilot cohort, participants in the mobile texting intervention had significantly lower odds of relapse to their primary drug over time compared with aftercare-as-usual controls, as measured by urinalysis (OR = 0.52, p = 0.002).
“A significant effect of condition on primary drug use relapse outcomes over time was observed as measured by urinalysis (OR = 0.52, p = 0.002): as the mobile texting intervention participants were significantly less likely to relapse to their primary drug across time compared to aftercare as usual control participants”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
There were no significant differences by condition over time in participation in self-help social support meetings (β = 2.79, p > .05).
“with no significant differences by condition over time (β = 2.79, p > .05).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
There was a significant treatment effect across time for participation in extracurricular recovery activities (β = 1.63, p = .03), with intervention participants increasing more than control participants.
“Results showed a significant treatment effect across time (β = 1.63, p = .03), with participation in recovery activities increasing significantly more among the intervention participants compared to the control participants.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data
Participation in self-help social support meetings significantly decreased over time among all participants (β = −3.09, p < .001).
“Analyses revealed that participation in self-help social support meetings significantly decreased over time among all participants (β = −3.09, p < .001)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the pilot, controlling for age and gender, there was a significant overall increase in substance use severity over time (β = 0.36, p = .02).
“As shown in Table 3, controlling for participant characteristics (age and gender), there was a significant overall increase in substance use severity over time (β = 0.36, p = .02)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Findingown data
In the pilot cohort, younger age was significantly associated with higher odds of primary drug relapse over time (OR = 0.89, p = 0.03).
“Results also showed a significant effect of age on primary drug use relapse outcomes over time (OR = 0.89, p = 0.03), such that younger aged participants had a higher odds of relapsing compared to older aged participants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Most research on social support programs for youth post-treatment has found poor compliance and limited engagement.
“Although these approaches have been referred to as the perfect aftercare, most research on these type of social support programs have found poor compliance and limited engagement among young people with substance use problems post-treatment (Sussman, 2010; Alcoholics Anonymous, 2007).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Sussman, 2010 source
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Alcoholics Anonymous, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Youth tend to return after treatment to environments that put them at high risk for relapse, including unsupportive family and substance-using peers or partners.
“Previous studies highlight that youth tend to return to environments that put them at high risk for relapse and problems, including untrusting or unsupportive family as well as continuing to socialize with substance-using peers/partners (Brown & Ramo, 2006; Godley et al., 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Brown & Ramo, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Godley et al., 2006 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning
A mobile text-messaging approach may effectively reach youth with substance abuse issues after treatment.
“a mobile-based, text-messaging approach is a potentially promising method to effectively reach youth challenged by substance abuse issues after treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Texting surpasses face-to-face contact, email, and voice calls as the main communication method for youth.
“The use of text-messaging in particular is appealing as a platform for youth, as it is supported by current U.S. based market sources which show texting to be the primary way that youth communicate, exceeding face-to-face contact, email, and voice-phone calls (Battestini, Setlur, & Sohn, 2010; Nielson Reports, 2010).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Battestini, Setlur, & Sohn, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Nielson Reports, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
Substance abuse treatment effects tend to diminish quickly after treatment, especially during the initial three months.
“research has also shown such treatment effects to quickly diminish post-treatment, especially during the initial 3-months (Cornelius et al., 2003; Brown, et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
The study design compares mobile texting aftercare to real-world aftercare service.
“Therefore, this design is essentially comparing a mobile texting aftercare intervention to “real-world” aftercare service.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Without suitable aftercare, youth face a very high risk of returning to high-risk settings and relapsing.
“Without such services, the return to high risk environments and risk for relapse is extremely high (Brown & Ramo, 2006).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Brown & Ramo, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation
There is a substantial unmet need for novel aftercare recovery support programs to engage substance-abusing youth post-treatment.
“There is a substantial unmet need for novel and innovative aftercare recovery support programs for engaging substance abusing youth post-treatment (Kaminer & Godley, 2010; Winters, Botzet, Fahnhorst, Stinchfield, & Koskey, 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kaminer & Godley, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Winters, Botzet, Fahnhorst, Stinchfield, & Koskey, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
At baseline, there were no differences between conditions in frequency of participation in recovery activities (Mint = 12.4 days ± 9.6 vs. Mcont = 14.1 days ± 10.9).
“Specifically, we found no differences in the frequency of participation in recovery activities at baseline (Mint= 12.4 days ± 9.6 versus Mcont = 14.1 days ± 10.9)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Most youth regularly use several diverse technology-based platforms for entertainment, information, and social interactions.
“Given that most youth regularly use regularly use several diverse technology-based platforms, like laptops, tablets, kindles, iPads, and phones for entertainment, general information, and social interactions (Rainee 2008; Lenhart et al., 2007)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Rainee 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lenhart et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductown data
The intervention and control conditions did not differ significantly in substance use severity at baseline (p = .13).
“It should be noted that two conditions were comparable in substance severity at baseline (not significantly different, p = .13).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation
Text messaging can produce effective behavior change results across diverse youth populations using relatively short behavioral interventions.
“Collectively, such research has demonstrated that text messaging can produce effective behavior change results across diverse youth populations using relatively short behavioral based interventions (Fjeldsoe, Marshall, & Miller, 2009; Krishna, Boren, & Balas, 2009).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Study design and conductown data
At baseline, the intervention and control groups did not differ in 12-step participation (Mint = 12.4 days ± 10.3 vs. Mcont = 10.3 days ± 9.7).
“Results showed that at baseline, there were no differences in 12-step participation between the conditions (Mint = 12.4 days ± 10.3 versus Mcont = 10.3 days ± 9.7).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Participating in aftercare significantly predicts lower relapse at one-year post-treatment follow-up.
“This is concerning since research has established that a significant predictor of positive treatment outcomes, i.e., reduced relapse at one-year post-treatment follow-up is aftercare participation (Burleson, Kaminer, & Burke, 2012; Brown, D’Amicio, McCarthy, et al., 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Burleson, Kaminer, & Burke, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Brown, D’Amicio, McCarthy, et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Study design and conductnone given
The study did not examine mental health status and criminal justice system issues as factors related to youth recovery and relapse outcomes.
“This study also did not examine other important factors that may be related to youth outcomes of recovery and relapse, including mental health status and criminal justice system issues”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Formative research approaches for intervention development with youth populations have been shown to be effective for behavior change because they include culturally relevant reflection and experiences of the targeted groups.
“Previous studies that have used formative research for intervention development with youth populations challenged by diverse behavior issues (Mathews, Everett, Binedell, & Steinberg, 1995; Nichter, Nichter, Thompson, Shiffman, & Moscicki, 2002; Vu, Murrie, Gonzalez, & Jobe, 2006) have shown such approaches to be effective for behavior change as it includes culturally-relevant reflection and experi”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Mathews, Everett, Binedell, & Steinberg, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Nichter, Nichter, Thompson, Shiffman, & Moscicki, 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Vu, Murrie, Gonzalez, & Jobe, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data
The results support the viability of mobile texting approaches as a promising alternative for fostering aftercare participation among recovering youth.
“Our results support the viability of using mobile technology texting approaches as a very promising alternative for fostering aftercare participation among recovering youth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationown data
The findings may not generalize to youth who did not self-select to participate in the study.
“These data are also based on youth who self-selected to participate in the study and may not generalize to other youth who did not volunteer to be in the recovery project post-treatment.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation
Individuals can learn to self-manage their problem behavior by engaging in self-evaluation or self-monitoring of critical areas and receiving tailored feedback.
“Specifically, individuals can learn to self-manage their problem behavior by engaging in a self-evaluative or self-monitoring process of the critical areas associated with problem behavior and then receiving tailored feedback to address the issues (Martin, 2004).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Martin, 2004 source
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation
Mobile approaches with youth can help address lack of recovery support participation and drop out after treatment.
“Another benefit that may be gained from using mobile approaches with youth is that it can help address the critical issues the field is challenged by with youth after treatment, including lack of recovery support participation (Sussman, 2010) and drop out (Hser, et al., 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked - Interpretationreasoning
The self-monitoring-feedback component of the aftercare intervention may be a viable way to encourage behavior change among participants who resonate with a personal control mentality.
“Findings from our study suggest, for example, that the self-monitoring-feedback component of the aftercare intervention may be a viable way to encourage behavior change among participants who resonate more strongly with a “personal control” mentality since self-monitoring allows participants both the capability to track, and therefore hopefully learn how to contain relapse-risk related areas.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation
Individuals using automated mobile aftercare may gain more confidence in self-managing their addiction behavior and coping with stressors.
“Moreover, although such automation may cause initial frustrations among individuals, i.e., not directly interacting with a human change agent); they may gain more confidence in themselves for learning to self-manage their addiction behavior and cope with stressors (Kobak, Greist, Jefferson, Katzelnick, & Schaettle, 1996; Bikel, Christensen, & Marsch, 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kobak, Greist, Jefferson, Katzelnick, & Schaettle, 1996
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Bikel, Christensen, & Marsch, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- The quote only partly states this claim. 1
- May combine two claims. 19
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 24
The quote only partly states this claim.
Findingown dataAmong intervention participants, those who relapsed were younger on average than those who did not relapse at month 1, month 2, discharge, and 90-day follow-up.
“The average age of relapse during the intervention at month 1 was 18.5 ± 3.0 and at month 2 was 18.1 ± 2.7, compared to those who did not relapse, whom were older: 21.0 ± 3.3 and 21.4 ±3.3, respectively.”
- Also stated in: § 3.2. Differences in Primary Drug Use Relapse Outcomes by Condition · hedged
“Specifically, youth who relapsed tended to be younger than those who did not relapse at discharge (19.3 years ± 3.3 vs. 21.7 ± 3.2) and 90-day follow-up (19.4 ± 3.2 vs. 21.6 ± 3.1).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Also stated in: § 3.2. Differences in Primary Drug Use Relapse Outcomes by Condition · hedged
May combine two claims.
Findingown dataIntervention participants showed reductions in substance use severity from baseline to 90-day follow-up, while control participants increased in severity.
“Figure 1 shows changes in substance use severity by condition over time, showing that the intervention participants had significant reductions in substance use severity from baseline to 90-day follow-up, whereas the control participants continued to increase in severity”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIn the pilot, controlling for age and gender, there was a significant treatment effect by time on substance use severity (β = −0.46, p = .03), with intervention participants showing a decreased rate of change compared with controls.
“however a significant treatment effect by time (β = −0.46, p = .03). Specifically, participants in the mobile texting intervention had a significant decreased rate of change in substance use severity (as lower scores indicate less substance-related problems present within the past month) across time compared to participants in the aftercare as usual control.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingown dataIntervention participants had significantly higher participation in recovery activities than control participants at discharge and at 90-day follow-up.
“however intervention participants were significantly more likely to have higher participation in recovery activities (M = 18.0 days ± 9.3) compared to the standard aftercare control participants (M = 10.1 days ± 9.3) at discharge as well as at the 90 day follow-up (Mint = 14.5 days ± 10.1 versus Mcont = 12.1 days ± 12.3, respectively).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAmong youth, substance use problems increase with age; past-30-day illicit drug use and binge drinking are higher among 18-25 year olds (26% and 32%) than among 12-17 year olds (12% and 10%).
“Specifically, current illicit drug use and binge drinking (in the past 30 days) among youth increased from 12% and 10% among 12 to 17 year olds to 26% and 32% among 18 to 25 year olds (Johnston, O’Malley, Bachman, & Schulenberg, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Johnston, O’Malley, Bachman, & Schulenberg, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationA majority of youth return to substance abuse treatment, often more than once.
“Research shows that a majority will return to treatment, often more than once (Cornelius, Maisto, Pollock, Martin, Salloum, Lynch, & Clark, 2003; Godley, Godley, Dennis, Funk & Passetti, 2002; Winters, Botzet, & Fahnhorst, 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Cornelius, Maisto, Pollock, Martin, Salloum, Lynch, & Clark, 2003
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Godley, Godley, Dennis, Funk & Passetti, 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Winters, Botzet, & Fahnhorst, 2011
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA growing majority of adults in substance abuse treatment are early-onset users who began use during adolescence or young adulthood.
“A growing majority of adults currently in treatment for substance abuse are early-onset users, those who initiated first-time use within the adolescent or young adult time period (Dennis & Kaminer, 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dennis & Kaminer, 2006
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataMobile texting might feasibly engage youth in recovery following substance abuse treatment, helping lower relapse and encourage lifestyle change.
“Collectively, findings from this pilot aftercare study suggest that mobile texting could provide a feasible way to engage youth in recovery after substance abuse treatment to aid with reducing relapse and promoting lifestyle behavior change.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationRelapse patterns commonly lead to a cyclic substance use-treatment trajectory among adult users.
“It is these relapse patterns that commonly lead to the development of the cyclic substance use-treatment trajectory commonly found among adults users (Anglin, Hser, & Grella, 1997).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Anglin, Hser, & Grella, 1997
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationAlthough most substance abuse behavioral treatments produce immediate measurable changes in post-treatment substance use, relapse in the first year after treatment remains a major concern for youth.
“Although most substance abuse behavioral treatments show promise in producing immediate measureable changes in post-treatment substance use, relapse in the initial year post-treatment remains a major concern for youth populations (Williams & Chang, 2000; Godley, Godley, & Dennis, 2001).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Williams & Chang, 2000
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Godley, Godley, & Dennis, 2001
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationPast-year illicit drug dependence and abuse prevalence is higher among 18-24 year olds (20%) than among 12-17 year olds (7.3%).
“Past year illicit drug dependence and abuse was estimated at 7.3% for 12–17 year olds, rising to 20% among 18 to 24 year olds (SAMHSA, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites SAMHSA, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationSubstance use behaviors are linked to problematic health, interpersonal, and social outcomes.
“These statistics are troubling since research links substance use behaviors to problematic health, interpersonal, and social (i.e., school, work, legal) outcomes (CDC, MMWR, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites CDC, MMWR, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
PremisecitationPost-treatment aftercare has been recommended as necessary to sustain treatment gains in adults and adolescents with substance use disorders.
“Post treatment aftercare, also referred to as continuing care, has been recommended as an essential factor for maintaining treatment gains after treatment for both adults and adolescents with substance use disorders (Godley et al., 2006, McKay, 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Godley et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- cites McKay, 1999
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA majority of youth (51%) agree that being high feels good, according to national epidemiological survey data.
“as reflected by national epidemiological survey studies which show a majority of youth (51%) “agree that being high feels good” (Partnership Attitude Tracking Study, 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Partnership Attitude Tracking Study, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Study design and conductreasoningThe fidelity of the aftercare-as-usual control condition was neither standardized nor monitored.
“No attempt was made to standardize or monitor the fidelity of the aftercare as usual standard condition, as it was the intent of the project to compare the mobile texting aftercare approach to the aftercare routinely delivered by treatment programs in the field.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationAmerican adolescents (13-17) send or receive 3,339 texts a month and young adults (18-24) send or receive 1,630 texts a month.
“Moreover, American youth have been identified as perpetual texters, with adolescents (aged 13 – 17) sending or receiving 3,339 texts a month (six text per waking hour) and young adults (aged 18 – 24) sending or receiving 1,630 (three texts per waking hour) (Fox & Duggan, 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Fox & Duggan, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Study design and conductown dataParticipants were randomly assigned to mobile texting intervention or aftercare as usual using a random generator number method.
“After completion of assessments, participants met with the RA for an overview of Project ESQYIR and their study assignment that was obtained using a random generator number method to one of two study conditions”
- Also stated in: § 2.2. Procedures · plain
“Participants were randomly assigned via research randomizer”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § 2.2. Procedures · plain
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationText-messaging mobile approaches have gained wide acceptance as promising behavior-change interventions for youth, especially in healthcare.
“Increasingly, mobile methods, using text-messaging models, have been widely embraced as promising behavior change interventions for youth populations (Patrick, Griswold, Raab, & Intille, 2008), especially within the healthcare arena of disease management (Cole-Lewis & Kershaw, 2010)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checkedMay combine two claims.
PremisecitationFew studies have examined post-treatment aftercare programs for youth, and such efforts are often restricted to traditional adult-modeled 12-step approaches.
“To date, however, there is little research on post-treatment aftercare programs for youth (White & Godley, 2007), with efforts often limited to traditional adult-modeled social support 12-step approaches (Kelly, Myers, & Brown, 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites White & Godley, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kelly, Myers, & Brown, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA youth smoking-cessation program delivered by text messaging improved quit rates at 6 weeks.
“For instance, a text messaging behavioral intervention designed for smoking cessation among youth demonstrated improved quit rates at 6 weeks (Rodgers et al., 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rodgers et al., 2005 source
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
InterpretationcitationThe texting intervention served as a buffer against the tendency for youth to continue to relapse and not engage in recovery support activities in the initial three months after treatment.
“Findings suggest that the texting intervention served as a buffer towards the tendency for youth to continue to relapse (Kaminer & Godley, 2010) and not engage in recovery support activities (Kelley et al., 2005) in the initial three months after treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kaminer & Godley, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kelley et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationFor teens aged 12-17, the typical daily number of texts increased from 50 in 2009 to 60 in 2011.
“Data reveal that the median number of texts sent on a typical day by teens 12 – 17 rose from 50 in 2009 to 60 in 2011 (Pew Research Center, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pew Research Center, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataCompared with standard aftercare, the mobile texting aftercare pilot program demonstrated promise for reducing relapse risk and promoting recovery behavior engagement among substance-abusing youth after treatment.
“Compared to a standard aftercare control condition, this mobile texting aftercare pilot program demonstrated promise for reducing relapse risk and promoting recovery behavior engagement among substance-abusing youth after treatment.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningTo address multiple comparisons, Bonferroni corrections were applied to p-values to limit Type I error inflation.
“In the analyses, we examined several outcomes, and to account for multiple comparison testing, Bonferroni adjustments were made to the p-values to control for Type I error inflation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA recent report indicated that participating in standard 12-step programs after substance abuse treatment can yield better outcomes than not participating.
“A recent report on the effectiveness of standard 12-step participation after substance abuse treatment demonstrated that such an approach can lead to positive outcomes compared to not participating (Davis et al., 2002).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Davis et al., 2002
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMobile texting is the most common form of mobile communication among youth, and cellphone ownership among youth has increased exponentially over the last five years.
“Mobile texting in particular has been designated as the most common form of mobile communication among youth, as ownership of cellphones among this segment of the population has increased exponentially over the last five years (Banks, 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Banks, 2008
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Study design and conductreasoningSelf-report data on substance use problem severity and recovery behaviors may have inherent over- or under-reporting biases.
“Additionally, because some of the data are based on self-report (i.e., substance use problem severity and recovery behaviors), there may be some inherent biases with over- or under-reporting information associated with participant responses.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningThe current study's findings can be useful for substance abuse practitioners by offering a novel texting aftercare model for engaging youth in recovery and motivating recovery behaviors.
“Findings from the current study can be useful for substance abuse practitioners who work with youth as it offers a novel aftercare model (i.e., texting) for engaging youth in recovery post-treatment and motivating them to engage in recovery behaviors, i.e., continue to make life changes.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationown dataProject ESQYIR is a promising aftercare intervention, but given its pilot nature, continued research on its components is warranted, especially among younger youth who continued to have relapse issues.
“Overall, Project ESQYIR can be described as a promising aftercare intervention; however given the pilot nature of the project, continued research on the utility and satisfaction with the differential components of the intervention are warranted, especially among younger aged youth who continued to have issues with relapse.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
PremisecitationMental health status and criminal justice system issues are commonly reported among substance-abusing youth.
“which are commonly reported among substance abusing-youth (Hser, Grella, Hubbard, Hsieh, Fletcher, Brown, & Anglin, 2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hser, Grella, Hubbard, Hsieh, Fletcher, Brown, & Anglin, 2001
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
PremisecitationQualitative findings with youth in treatment found very few endorsing total abstinence recovery mottos, and instead embracing substance use as a lifestyle behavior and a matter of personal control or choice.
“This was supported by qualitative findings with youth in treatment which found very few youth endorsing total abstinence recovery mottos, and instead embracing substance use to be more of a life-style behavior and a matter of personal control/choice (Gonzales et al., 2012)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gonzales et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
InterpretationreasoningMobile-based aftercare approaches require minimal time commitments and effort from providers because most service information can be automated.
“Lastly, such mobile-based aftercare approaches require minimal time commitments and effort from providers as the majority of service-information can be automated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningMobile texting recovery programs offer advantages over traditional approaches, including personalization, convenience, enhanced assessment and monitoring, flexibility, and low financial cost.
“Implementing a mobile texting recovery program offers several advantages over traditional-based approaches currently in place, including (1) personalization and targeted engagement, (2) increased convenience; (3) enhanced assessment and monitoring; (4) greater flexibility of service delivery in terms of frequency and timing; and (5) requiring minimal financial resources to maintain.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationA disease management framework for chronic illnesses promotes self-regulation via self-monitoring as a critical component for achieving and sustaining behavior change.
“This theoretical model supports a disease management framework commonly used in health care with chronic illnesses which promote self-regulation via self-monitoring as a critical component for achieving and sustaining behavior change (Wagner, 2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wagner, 2001 source
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
PremisecitationInformation technology has substantially broadened the scope of health-related service delivery.
“Even within the last year, information technology has broadened the scope of health-related service delivery substantially (Goldzweig, Towfigh, Maglione, & Shekelle, 2009).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Goldzweig, Towfigh, Maglione, & Shekelle, 2009
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim.
Study design and conductreasoningThe results are based on a pilot study, so caution is needed when interpreting the effectiveness of the mobile-based aftercare intervention.
“Caution should be taken when interpreting the results (i.e., effectiveness of the mobile-based aftercare intervention) as it is based on a pilot study.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
InterpretationreasoningPromoting lifestyle behavior change focused on wellness for recovery can be effective, rather than traditional aftercare approaches that focus on complete abstinence.
“Findings also imply that promoting lifestyle behavior change in a way that meets their needs (i.e., focus on wellness for recovery) can be effective rather than following traditional aftercare approaches that tend to focus on and enforce complete abstinence (i.e., 12-step models).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
InterpretationreasoningMobile technology greatly enhances access to aftercare services because they can be accessed anytime and anywhere.
“Additionally, because aftercare services to support recovery are not routinely or systematically rendered in the substance use treatment field, mobile technology greatly enhances access to such services as they can be accessed anytime and anywhere.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Aftercare services to support recovery are not routinely or systematically rendered in the substance use treatment field.
The paper relies on this without support.
Aftercare services to support recovery are not routinely or systematically rendered in the substance use treatment field.
“Additionally, because aftercare services to support recovery are not routinely or systematically rendered in the substance use treatment field, mobile technology greatly enhances access to such services as they can be accessed anytime and anywhere.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The market penetration of health information-based technologies is making behavioral health self-management tools increasingly accessible.
“The market penetration of health information-based technologies, broadly encompassing standard mobile phones, smart phones, tablet computers, or wireless local area networks, is rendering a world where behavioral health self-management tools are becoming increasingly accessible.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Digital interventions for SUDs have demonstrated efficacy for screening and assessment, treatment and recovery, as stand-alone tools or as adjuncts to clinician-delivered interventions.
“Digital interventions for SUDs have demonstrated efficacy for screening and assessment 251- 253 , treatment 254,255 and recovery 250,256 , as stand- alone tools or as adjuncts to clinician- delivered in terventions.”
From Substance use disorders: a comprehensive update of classification, epidemiology, neurobiology, clinical aspects, treatment and prevention (2023) · cites this paper as [250]
The Discussion reports that a mobile-texting aftercare program showed promise for reducing relapse risk and supporting recovery among youth after substance-use treatment. But the cited paper is a pilot of one recovery intervention, and its Limitations section cautions against firm conclusions about effectiveness. It does not establish the broader efficacy of digital interventions for screening, assessment, or treatment; the printed sentence cites other sources for those uses. (LLM, conf=0.84)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.
Reported participant age exceeds the eligibility limit
MinorParticipants were required to be no older than 25, but the reported sample includes a 26-year-old. The abstract gives an even narrower age range of 12 to 24.
“Inclusion criteria for study participation was youth between the ages of 12 to 25 years old”
“The average age of the sample was 20.4 (SD = 3.5), ranging from 14 – 26 years old.”
Cites
Health Behavior and Health Education: Theory, Research, and Practice
(1992) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-116-4-350_1 · Cited by 13,211 · see citing works
Social cognitive theory of self-regulation
Bandura, A. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90022-l · Cited by 6,875 · see citing works
Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action
Wagner, E. H., Austin, B. T., Davis, C., Hindmarsh, M., Schaefer, J., & Bonomi, A. (2001) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.64 · Cited by 3,446 · see citing works
Youth risk behavior surveillance-United States, 2017
Kann, L., McManus, T., Harris, W. A., Shanklin, S. L., Flint, K. H., Queen, B., Lowry, R., Chyen, D., Whittle, L., Thornton, J., et al. (2018) · MMWR. Surveillance Summaries · doi:10.15585/mmwr.ss6708a1 · Cited by 2,502 · see citing works
Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance - United States, 2009
Eaton, D. K., Kann, L. K., Kinchen, S., Shanklin, S. L., Flint, K. H., Hawkins, J., Harris, W. A., Lowry, R., McManus, T., Chyen, D., et al. (2010) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e661322010-001 · Cited by 1,753 · see citing works
Volume, I. I. (2017) · Institute for Social Research eBooks · doi:10.3998/2027.42/139710 · Cited by 1,369 · see citing works
Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance--United States, 1995.
Kann, L., Warren, C., Harris, W., Collins, J. L., Williams, B., Ross, J., & Kolbe, L. (1996) · MMWR CDC Surveillance Summaries · doi:10.1037/e641342009-001 · Cited by 1,266 · see citing works
Behavior change interventions delivered by mobile telephone short message service
Fjeldsoe, B. S., Marshall, A. L., & Miller, Y. D. (2009) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.09.040 · Cited by 1,213 · see citing works
Text messaging as a tool for behavior change in disease prevention and management
Cole-Lewis, H., & Kershaw, T. (2010) · Epidemiologic Reviews · doi:10.1093/epirev/mxq004 · Cited by 1,190 · see citing works
Healthcare via Cell Phones: A Systematic Review
Krishna, S., Boren, S. A., & Balas, E. A. (2009) · Telemedicine and e-Health · doi:10.1089/tmj.2008.0099 · Cited by 882 · see citing works
Rodgers, A., Corbett, T., Bramley, D., Riddell, T., Wills, M., Lin, R.-B., & Jones, M. (2005) · Tobacco Control · doi:10.1136/tc.2005.011577 · Cited by 732 · see citing works
Franklin, V. L., Waller, A., Pagliari, C., & Greene, S. A. (2006) · Diabetic Medicine · doi:10.1111/j.1464-5491.2006.01989.x · Cited by 543 · see citing works
Patrick, K., Griswold, W. G., Raab, F., & Intille, S. S. (2008) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2008.05.001 · Cited by 479 · see citing works
A comprehensive and comparative review of adolescent substance abuse treatment outcome
Williams, R. J., Addiction Centre Adolescent Research Group, & Chang, S. Y. (2000) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.7.2.138 · Cited by 453 · see citing works
Costs And Benefits Of Health Information Technology: New Trends From The Literature
Goldzweig, C. L., Towfigh, A., Maglione, M., & Shekelle, P. (2009) · Health Affairs · doi:10.1377/hlthaff.28.2.w282 · Cited by 375 · see citing works
Self-regulated learning, social cognitive theory, and agency
Martin, J. (2004) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3902_4 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
An Evaluation of Drug Treatments for Adolescents in 4 US Cities
Hser, Y.-I., Grella, C. E., Hubbard, R. L., Hsieh, S.-C., Fletcher, B. W., Brown, B. S., & Anglin, M. D. (2001) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.58.7.689 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Self-citationSMS STI: A Review of the Uses of Mobile Phone Text Messaging in Sexual Health
Lim, M. S. C., Hocking, J. S., Hellard, M. E., & Aitken, C. K. (2008) · International Journal of STD & AIDS · doi:10.1258/ijsa.2007.007264 · Cited by 293 · see citing works
Hanauer, D. A., Wentzell, K., Laffel, N., & Laffel, L. M. (2009) · Diabetes Technology & Therapeutics · doi:10.1089/dia.2008.0022 · Cited by 261 · see citing works
Godley, M., Godley, S., Dennis, M. L., Funk, R. R., & Passetti, L. (2002) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/s0740-5472(02)00230-1 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Continuing care research: What we have learned and where we are going
McKay, J. R. (2009) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2008.10.004 · Cited by 249 · see citing works
Gerber, B. S., Stolley, M. R., Thompson, A. L., Sharp, L. K., & Fitzgibbon, M. (2009) · Health Informatics Journal · doi:10.1177/1460458208099865 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Innovations in Adolescent Substance Abuse Interventions
Wagner, E. F., Brown, S. A., Monti, P. M., Myers, M. G., & Waldron, H. B. (2001) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-08-043577-0.x5019-6 · Cited by 214 · see citing works
Anglin, M. D., Hser, Y.-I., & Grella, C. E. (1997) · Psychology of Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1037/0893-164x.11.4.308 · Cited by 213 · see citing works
Self-citationDevelopment and initial evaluation of the Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM)
Cacciola, J. S., Alterman, A. I., DePhilippis, D., Drapkin, M. L., Valadez, C., Fala, N. C., Oslin, D., & McKay, J. R. (2013) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2012.07.013 · Cited by 203 · cited 2× · see citing works
“For this, we used the following variables from the BAM: number of days in the past month participants reported engaging in extracurricular recovery activities as well as participating in self-help/12-step meetings.”
Godley, M. D., Godley, S. H., Dennis, M. L., Funk, R. R., & Passetti, L. L. (2007) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01648.x · Cited by 193 · see citing works
The Teen-Addiction Severity Index: rationale and reliability.
Kaminer, Y., Bukstein, O., & Tarter, R. (1991) · International Journal of the Addictions · doi:10.3109/10826089109053184 · Cited by 182 · see citing works
Rapid relapse generally follows treatment for substance use disorders among adolescents
Cornelius, J. R., Maisto, S. A., Pollock, N. K., Martin, C. S., Salloum, I. M., Lynch, K. G., & Clark, D. B. (2003) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/s0306-4603(01)00247-7 · Cited by 153 · see citing works
Use of text messaging in the aftercare of patients with bulimia nervosa
Bauer, S., Percevic, R., Okon, E., Meermann, R., & Kordy, H. (2003) · European Eating Disorders Review · doi:10.1002/erv.521 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Four-year outcomes from adolescent alcohol and drug treatment
Brown, S. A., D'Amico, E. J., McCarthy, D. M., & Tapert, S. F. (2001) · Journal of Studies on Alcohol · doi:10.15288/jsa.2001.62.381 · Cited by 147 · cited 2× · see citing works
“, 2009); research has also shown such treatment effects to quickly diminish post-treatment, especially during the initial 3-months (Brown et al., 2011; Cornelius et al., 2003).”
Listening to Girls and Boys Talk About Girls’ Physical Activity Behaviors
Vu, M. B., Murrie, D., Gonzalez, V., & Jobe, J. B. (2006) · Health Education & Behavior · doi:10.1177/1090198105282443 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Mobile phone text messaging can help young people manage asthma
Neville, R. G., Greene, A., McLeod, J., Tracy, A., & Surie, J. (2002) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.325.7364.600/a · Cited by 124 · see citing works
Advances in Adolescent Substance Abuse Treatment
Winters, K. C., Botzet, A. M., & Fahnhorst, T. (2011) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-011-0214-2 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
A review of Alcoholics Anonymous/Narcotics Anonymous programs for teens
Sussman, S. (2010) · Evaluation & the Health Professions · doi:10.1177/0163278709356186 · Cited by 115 · see citing works
Effectiveness of Continuing Care Interventions for Substance Abusers
McKay, J. R. (2001) · Evaluation Review · doi:10.1177/0193841x0102500205 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
A Comprehensive and Comparative Review of Adolescent Substance Abuse Treatment Outcome
Williams, R. J. (2000) · Clinical Psychology Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy/7.2.138 · Cited by 82 · see citing works
Adolescent Substance Abuse: Research and Clinical Advances
Liddle, H. A., & Rowe, C. L. (2006) · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Using qualitative research to inform survey development on nicotine dependence among adolescents
Nichter, M., Nichter, M., Thompson, P. J., Shiffman, S. S., & Moscicki, A. (2002) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/s0376-8716(02)00214-4 · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Bickel, W. K., Christensen, D. R., & Marsch, L. A. (2010) · Substance Use & Misuse · doi:10.3109/10826084.2011.521066 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Kelly, J. F., Myers, M. G., & Brown, S. A. (2005) · Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse · doi:10.1300/j029v15n01_05 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Adolescent Substance Abuse Treatment: A Review of Evidence-Based Research
Winters, K. C., Botzet, A. M., Stinchfield, R. D., Gonzales-Castaneda, R., Finch, A. J., Piehler, T. F., Ausherbauer, K. L., Chalmers, K. D., & Hemze, A. (2018) · Issues in children's and families' lives · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-90611-9_5 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Understanding Recovery Barriers: Youth Perceptions About Substance Use Relapse
Gonzales, R. E., Anglin, M. D., Beattie, R., Ong, C. A., & Glik, D. C. (2012) · American Journal of Health Behavior · doi:10.5993/ajhb.36.5.3 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Assertive Aftercare Protocol for Adolescent Substance Abusers
Godley, S. H., Godley, M. D., & Dennis, M. L. (2001) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-008043577-0/50034-1 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Adolescent Substance Abuse Treatment: A Review of Evidence-Based Research
Winters, K. C., Botzet, A. M., Fahnhorst, T., Stinchfield, R. D., & Koskey, R. (2008) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-09732-9_4 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Perceptions of Chronicity and Recovery Among Youth in Treatment for Substance Use Problems
Gonzales, R. E., Anglin, M. D., Beattie, R., Ong, C. A., & Glik, D. C. (2012) · Journal of Adolescent Health · doi:10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.11.010 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Self-citationClinical course of youth following treatment for alcohol and drug problems
Brown, S. A., & Ramo, D. E. (2006) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511543968.005 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Twelve-month follow-up of aftercare for adolescents with alcohol use disorders
Burleson, J. A., Kaminer, Y., & Burke, R. H. (2011) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2011.07.001 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Mathews, C., Everett, K., Binedell, J., & Steinberg, M. (1995) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/0277-9536(95)00131-p · Cited by 32 · see citing works
From assessment reactivity to aftercare for adolescent substance abuse: are we there yet?
Kaminer, Y., & Godley, M. (2010) · Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.chc.2010.03.009 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Gonzales, R., Anglin, M. D., & Glik, D. C. (2013) · Health Education Research · doi:10.1093/her/cyt094 · Cited by 27 · see citing works
Self-citationDennis, M. L., & Kaminer, Y. (2006) · American Journal on Addictions · doi:10.1080/10550490601100619 · Cited by 22 · see citing works
Innovations in adolescent substance abuse interventions
Zvolensky, M. J., Feldner, M. T., & Leen, E. W. (2002) · Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0005-7916(02)00008-3 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
A trial of “standard” outpatient alcoholism treatment vs. a minimal treatment control
Davis, W. T., Campbell, L., Tax, J., & Lieber, C. S. (2002) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/s0740-5472(02)00227-1 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Gonzales, R. E., Anglin, M. D., Glik, D. C., & Zavalza, C. (2013) · Journal of Psychoactive Drugs · doi:10.1080/02791072.2013.825028 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
Self-citationAdolescent Substance Abuse: Research and Clinical Advances
MATORIN, A. A. (2006) · Addictive Disorders & Their Treatment · doi:10.1097/01.adt.0000210721.56434.3a · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
1 of the 56 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.
Research works printed but not linked: 3
- Kobak, 1996, Computerized assessment in clinical drug trials, Psychopharmacology Bulletin, 32, 464
- Leach-Lemens, 2009, Using mobile phones in HIV care and prevention, HIV AIDS treatment in practice, 137, 2
- White, 2007, Adolescent recovery: What we need to know, Student Assistance Journal, 19, 20
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Volkow, N. D., & Blanco, C. (2023) · World psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.21073 · Cited by 503 · see citing works
Liverpool, S., Mota, C. P., Sales, C. M. D., Čuš, A., Carletto, S., Hancheva, C., Sousa, S., Cerón, S. C., Moreno-Peral, P., Pietrabissa, G., et al. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/16317 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Berrouiguet, S., Baca-García, E., Brandt, S., Walter, M., & Courtet, P. (2016) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.5066 · Cited by 332 · see citing works
A Systematic Review of the mHealth Interventions to Prevent Alcohol and Substance Abuse
Kazemi, D. M., Borsari, B., Levine, M. J., Li, S., Lamberson, K. A., & Matta, L. A. (2017) · Journal of Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10810730.2017.1303556 · Cited by 255 · see citing works
Lindhiem, O., Bennett, C. B., Rosen, D., & Silk, J. (2015) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/0145445515595198 · Cited by 197 · see citing works
Preventive Health Behavior Change Text Message Interventions: A Meta-analysis
Armanasco, A. A., Miller, Y. D., Fjeldsoe, B. S., & Marshall, A. L. (2017) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2016.10.042 · Cited by 210 · see citing works
Ramos, G., & Chavira, D. A. (2022) · Cognitive and Behavioral Practice · doi:10.1016/j.cbpra.2019.10.004 · Cited by 143 · see citing works
Nesvåg, S. M., & McKay, J. R. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.9873 · Cited by 150 · see citing works
Carreiro, S., Newcomb, M., Leach, R., Ostrowski, S. J., Boudreaux, E. D., & Amante, D. J. (2020) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108201 · Cited by 108 · see citing works
Technology-based Interventions for Preventing and Treating Substance Use Among Youth
Marsch, L. A., & Borodovsky, J. T. (2016) · Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.chc.2016.06.005 · Cited by 75 · see citing works
Tofighi, B., Nicholson, J., McNeely, J., Muench, F. J., & Lee, J. D. (2017) · Drug and Alcohol Review · doi:10.1111/dar.12535 · Cited by 72 · see citing works
The Role of Technology-Based Interventions for Substance Use Disorders in Primary Care
Tofighi, B., Abrantes, A. M., & Stein, M. D. (2018) · Medical Clinics of North America · doi:10.1016/j.mcna.2018.02.011 · Cited by 69 · see citing works
Adolescent Substance Abuse Treatment: A Review of Evidence-Based Research
Winters, K. C., Botzet, A. M., Stinchfield, R. D., Gonzales-Castaneda, R., Finch, A. J., Piehler, T. F., Ausherbauer, K. L., Chalmers, K. D., & Hemze, A. (2018) · Issues in children's and families' lives · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-90611-9_5 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Systematic review: Digital recovery support services used to support substance use disorder recovery
Ashford, R. D., Bergman, B. G., Kelly, J. F., & Curtis, B. L. (2019) · Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies · doi:10.1002/hbe2.148 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Trudeau, K. J., Black, R. A., Kamon, J. L., & Sussman, S. Y. (2017) · Child & Youth Care Forum · doi:10.1007/s10566-016-9387-5 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Scott, C. K., Dennis, M. L., Grella, C. E., Funk, R. R., & Lurigio, A. J. (2019) · Health & Justice · doi:10.1186/s40352-019-0093-x · Cited by 54 · see citing works
Rabbi, M., Philyaw-Kotov, M. L., Cunningham, R. M., Bonar, E. E., Nahum-Shani, I. B., Klasnja, P., Walton, M. A., & Murphy, S. A. (2018) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/resprot.9850 · Cited by 45 · see citing works
Conley, C. S., Raposa, E. B., Bartolotta, K., Broner, S. E., Hareli, M., Forbes, N., Christensen, K. M., & Assink, M. (2022) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/34254 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Text Message Interventions in Adolescent Mental Health and Addiction Services: Scoping Review
MacDougall, S., Jerrott, S., Clark, S. E., Campbell, L. A., Murphy, A. L., & Wozney, L. (2020) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/16508 · Cited by 42 · see citing works
Bergman, B. G., Greene, M. C., Hoeppner, B. B., & Kelly, J. F. (2018) · Addictive Behaviors · doi:10.1016/j.addbeh.2018.06.018 · Cited by 40 · see citing works
Hauschildt, M., Schröder, J., & Moritz, S. (2016) · Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.jocrd.2016.04.010 · Cited by 37 · see citing works
Gonzales, R. E., Hernandez, M., Murphy, D. A., & Ang, A. (2015) · American Journal on Addictions · doi:10.1111/ajad.12322 · Cited by 33 · see citing works
Self-citationCzyz, E. K., Arango, A., Healy, N. A., King, C. A., & Walton, M. A. (2020) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/17345 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
O’Logbon, J., Wickersham, A., Williamson, C., & Leightley, D. (2023) · Journal of Mental Health · doi:10.1080/09638237.2023.2245902 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Kmiec, J. A., & Suffoletto, B. P. (2019) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2019.02.005 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
Workshop on Implementation Science and Digital Therapeutics for Behavioral Health
Lord, S., Campbell, A. N. C., Brunette, M. F., Cubillos, L., Bartels, S. M., Torrey, W. C., Olson, A. L., Chapman, S. H., Batsis, J. A., Polsky, D. E., et al. (2020) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/17662 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Buckheit, K. A., Moskal, D., Spinola, S., & Maisto, S. A. (2018) · Current Addiction Reports · doi:10.1007/s40429-018-0209-8 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
Kazemi, D. M., Borsari, B. E., Levine, M. J., Lamberson, K. A., & Dooley, B. (2017) · Addiction Research & Theory · doi:10.1080/16066359.2017.1420783 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Coughlin, L., Nahum-Shani, I., Bonar, E., Philyaw-Kotov, M. L., Rabbi, M., Klasnja, P., & Walton, M. (2021) · Substance Use & Misuse · doi:10.1080/10826084.2021.1972314 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Ashford, R. D., Giorgi, S., Mann, B., Pesce, C., Sherritt, L., Ungar, L., & Curtis, B. L. (2019) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2019.11.005 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Blitchtein-Winicki, D., Zevallos, K., Samolski, M. R., Requena, D., Velarde, C., Briceño, P., Piazza, M., & Ybarra, M. L. (2017) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/mhealth.7532 · Cited by 20 · see citing works
Becker, S. J., Helseth, S. A., Janssen, T., Kelly, L. M., Escobar, K. I., Souza, T., Wright, T. G., & Spirito, A. (2021) · Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.jsat.2021.108457 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
Suffoletto, B. P., Yanta, J. H., Kurtz, R., Cochran, G., Douaihy, A. B., & Chung, T. A. (2017) · Journal of Addiction Medicine · doi:10.1097/adm.0000000000000351 · Cited by 19 · see citing works
The Feasibility and Acceptability of “Arise”: An Online Substance Abuse Relapse Prevention Program
Sanchez, R. P., & Bartel, C. M. (2014) · Games for Health Journal · doi:10.1089/g4h.2014.0015 · Cited by 17 · see citing works
Ryan-Pettes, S. R., Lange, L. L., & Magnuson, K. I. (2019) · JMIR mhealth and uhealth · doi:10.2196/12407 · Cited by 16 · see citing works
Gonzales-Castaneda, R., McKay, J. R., Steinberg, J. K., Winters, K. C., Yu, C. H., Valdovinos, I. C., Casillas, J. M., & McCarthy, K. C. (2019) · Substance Abuse · doi:10.1080/08897077.2019.1671941 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Technological aids for improving longitudinal research on substance use disorders
Farabee, D. J., Schulte, M. T., Gonzales, R. E., & Grella, C. E. (2016) · BMC Health Services Research · doi:10.1186/s12913-016-1630-0 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationKwan, I., Burchett, H., Macdowall, W. G., D’Souza, P., Stansfield, C., Kneale, D., & Sutcliffe, K. (2025) · Addiction · doi:10.1111/add.70021 · Cited by 15 · see citing works
Pedersen, M. U., Hesse, M., Thylstrup, B., Jones, S. D., Pedersen, M. M., & Frederiksen, K. S. (2020) · Drug and Alcohol Dependence · doi:10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108363 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Becker, S. J., Helseth, S. A., Janssen, T., Kelly, L. M., Escobar, K. I., & Spirito, A. (2021) · Evidence-Based Practice in Child and Adolescent Mental Health · doi:10.1080/23794925.2021.1961644 · Cited by 13 · see citing works
Cash, S. J., Murfree, L., & Schwab‐Reese, L. M. (2020) · Child Abuse & Neglect · doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2020.104414 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Consumer Health Information Technology in the Prevention of Substance Abuse: Scoping Review
Pradhan, A., Park, L., Shaya, F. T., & Finkelstein, J. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/11297 · Cited by 12 · see citing works
Kopak, A. M., Proctor, S. L., & Hoffmann, N. G. (2016) · Addiction Research & Theory · doi:10.1080/16066359.2016.1265109 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Curtis, B. L., Bergman, B. G., Brown, A. M., McDaniel, J. M., Harper, K., Eisenhart, E., Hufnagel, M., Heller, A. T., & Ashford, R. D. (2019) · JMIR Mental Health · doi:10.2196/13352 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Cohen‐Cline, H., Jones, K., & Vartanian, K. B. (2020) · Children and Youth Services Review · doi:10.1016/j.childyouth.2020.105707 · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Dauber, S. E., Beacham, A. R., Hammond, C., West, A. L., & Thrul, J. (2022) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/36849 · Cited by 9 · see citing works
Helseth, S. A., Scott, K., Escobar, K. I., Jiménez, F. N., & Becker, S. J. (2021) · Substance Abuse · doi:10.1080/08897077.2021.1915916 · Cited by 8 · see citing works
Gaolaolwe, W., Moagi, M. M., Kovane, G. P., & Sehularo, L. A. (2024) · Journal of Psychiatric and Mental Health Nursing · doi:10.1111/jpm.13144 · Cited by 6 · see citing works
Mobile applications used to limit alcohol consumption – a literature review
Wieczorek, Ł., & Klingemann, J. I. (2020) · Alcoholism and Drug Addiction · doi:10.5114/ain.2020.95979 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
Tolou‐Shams, M., Ramaiya, M., Salas, J. L., Ezimora, I., Shumway, M., Berrick, J. D., Aguilera, A., Borsari, B. E., Dauria, E., Friedling, N., et al. (2023) · JMIR Research Protocols · doi:10.2196/49999 · Cited by 5 · see citing works
A Review of Recent Efforts to Improve Access to Effective Psychotherapies
Yasinski, C. W., & Rauch, S. A. M. (2018) · FOCUS The Journal of Lifelong Learning in Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.focus.20180018 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
The Role of Texting in Addressing Mental Health
Ranney, M. L., Pisani, A. R., & Chernick, L. S. (2018) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-69638-6_15 · Cited by 4 · see citing works
Coll, K. M., Stewart, R. A., Scholl, S., & Hauser, N. (2021) · Residential Treatment for Children & Youth · doi:10.1080/0886571x.2021.1985684 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Technology Assisted Therapies for Substance Use Disorder
Sherer, J., Richman, E., & Shalvoy, K. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-26445-0_1 · Cited by 3 · see citing works
Creating pathways to integration: The impact of community-based intervention in Gugulethu
Larner, S. M. (2017) · South African Crime Quarterly · doi:10.17159/2413-3108/2018/v0n61a2605 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
McKinnon, C. R., Johnson, D., & Stephan, L. M. (2021) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119487593.ch23 · Cited by 2 · see citing works
Alcohol and Drug Use Disorders
Baca-Atlas, M., Baca-Atlas, S. N., & Fedoriw, K. B. (2023) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-29171-5_6 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Refining Parent SMART: User feedback to optimize a multi-modal intervention
Becker, S. J., Shiller, H., Fan, Y. A., DiBartolo, E., Olson, M. B., Casline, E. P., Wijaya, C., Helseth, S. A., & Kelly, L. M. (2024) · Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.josat.2024.209405 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Mobile health interventions for substance use reduction: a systematic review
Guta, M. T., Abamecha, F., Amdisa, D., & Abate, K. H. (2025) · F1000Research · doi:10.12688/f1000research.162638.1 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Aggarwal, M., Borycki, E. M., Wagner, E., Gosselin, K., & |, |. (2020) · Knowledge Management & E-Learning An International Journal · doi:10.34105/j.kmel.2020.12.025 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Torpe, G. (2014) · NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives
Gonzales, R. E., Steinberg, J. K., Winters, K. C., Murphy, D. A., Ang, A., Hernandez, M., & Mugahwi, M. (2017) · Journal of Child & Adolescent Substance Abuse · doi:10.1080/1067828x.2017.1305929
Self-citationCurrent Status of Researches on Surveillance and Early Warning of Mental Health
Liu, L., & Bian, G. (2019) · OALib · doi:10.4236/oalib.1105832
Schwebel, F. J. (2019) · ResearchWorks at the University of Washington (University of Washington)
Chapter 29. Digitally Delivered Therapies
Lord, S., Seavey, K. M., Budney, A. J., & Marsch, L. A. (2021) · American Psychiatric Association Publishing eBooks · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9781615373970.kb29
(2019) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/978-1-78973-709-720191013
Evidence-Based Treatments for Adolescent Substance Use Disorders
Deas, D., & Cooper, T. (2020) · Issues in clinical child psychology · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-44226-2_21
Meta-Analysis on the Effectiveness of mHealth Interventions for Mental Health: A 10-Year Update
Tomlinson, C. S., Toevs, E. K., Gallagher, H. T., Angus, A., & Lindhiem, O. J. (2025) · Behavior Modification · doi:10.1177/01454455251380218 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Floating treatment wetlands: An innovative option for wastewater treatment
Ganesan, K., Kamaludeen, S. P. B., Maheswari, M., Subburamu, K., & Devaraj, S. S. (2026) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-443-36731-1.00016-9
Viera, A., Edelman, E. J., Lauckner, C., Muilenburg, J. L., & Kershaw, T. C. (2026) · Journal of Substance Use and Addiction Treatment · doi:10.1016/j.josat.2026.210058
- Authors
- Gonzales, R., Ang, A., Murphy, D. A., Glik, D. C., & Anglin, M. D.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Los Angeles (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2014-07
- Volume
- 47
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 20-26
- ISSN
- 0740-5472 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC4011993
- OpenAlex
- W2087479833
- Semantic Scholar
- 39a3ca8fada01292cd6a7c12c9d4e146128a75a1
- Cited by
- 70
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2
- FWCI
- 4.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
- Locations
- Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
- PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
- Funders
- National Institutes of Health (5p30da016383-10)
- National Institute on Drug Abuse (P30-DA016383, K01DA027754)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Keywords
- adolescent substance use, substance use disorder recovery, text messaging, relapse prevention, residential treatment, outpatient care, recovery behavior, feasibility
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Community Mental Health Services, Feasibility Studies, Female, Humans, Male, Pilot Projects, Substance Abuse Treatment Centers, Substance-Related Disorders, Young Adult, Text Messaging
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-09.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-09.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review