Cited by 197Digital Mental Health InterventionsMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsPsychotherapy Techniques and Applications

Mobile Technology Boosts the Effectiveness of Psychotherapy and Behavioral Interventions: A Meta-Analysis

Open access
Lindhiem, Oliver, Bennett, Charles B., Rosen, Dana, Silk, Jennifer·2015·Behavior Modification

Abstract

We conducted a meta-analysis on the effects of mobile technology on treatment outcome for psychotherapy and other behavioral interventions. Our search of the literature resulted in 26 empirical articles describing 25 clinical trials testing the benefits of smartphone applications, personal digital assistants (PDAs), or text messaging systems either to supplement treatment or substitute for direct contact with a clinician. Overall, mobile technology use was associated with superior treatment outcome across all study designs and control conditions, effect size (ES) = .34, p < .0001. For the subset of 10 studies that looked specifically at the added benefit of mobile technology using a rigorous “Treatment” versus “Treatment + Mobile” design, effect sizes were only slightly more modest (ES = .27) and still significant ( p < .05). Overall, the results support the role of mobile technology for the delivery of psychotherapy and other behavioral interventions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0145445515595198

Cites

48 of 48 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Lindhiem O Higa J Trentacosta CJ Herschell AD Kolko DJ 2014 Skill acquisition and utilization during evidence-based psychosocial treatments for childhood disruptive behavior problems: A review and meta-analysis Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review 17 41 66 10.1007/s10567-013-0136-0 23649324 PMC3859702 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lindhiem, O., Bennett, C. B., Rosen, D., & Silk, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Pittsburgh (US)
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Lindhiem, Oliver
Venue
Behavior Modification
Published
2015-07-17
Volume
39
Issue
6
Pages
785-804
ISSN
  • 0145-4455 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-4167
OpenAlex
W2180980536
Cited by
197
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 14 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 30 · 2020: 29 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 6
FWCI
23.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Behavior Modification (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R34MH102666, MH093508, K01MH093508)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
Keywords
mobile technology, psychotherapy, behavioral interventions, mobile application, personal digital assistants, text messaging, treatment outcomes, digital mental health, external beam radiotherapy
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Behavior Therapy, Humans, Middle Aged, Psychotherapy, Treatment Outcome, Text Messaging, Mobile Applications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review