Cited by 23Substance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

A Pilot Study of a Brief Motivational Intervention for Incarcerated Drinkers

Open access
Owens, Mandy D., McCrady, Barbara S.·2016·Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Abstract

Almost half of convicted jail inmates have an alcohol use disorder and many are released to environments that put them in contact with network members and cues that make them more likely to relapse on alcohol or drugs. Given the high-risk period immediately following release, the purpose of this study was to examine the efficacy of a brief motivational intervention administered just prior to release to increase substance use treatment entry and attendance, decrease alcohol and drug use, and change social networks for inmates with alcohol use disorders. Forty adult male inmates with AUDs were consented into the study and randomized to a motivational intervention or the control condition (an educational intervention), and then were contacted to do a 1-month follow-up interview (62.5% completed this interview). Results indicated that conducting these interventions was feasible and considered extremely helpful by participants. Although there were no significant group differences, medium to large effect sizes suggest possible benefits from the motivational intervention in decreasing days of alcohol and drug use and increasing abstinence, and reducing the proportion of heavy drug users or users of any kind in the social network. Future studies should replicate these findings in larger sample sizes and over longer follow-up time periods. Results may have implications for the use of brief intervention strategies at jails for inmates with AUDs.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.05.005

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • ACT compared with CBT for prisoners with polysubstance use showed greater results in abstinence rates.

    “Another pilot study41, 21 compared ACT with CBT for prisoners with polysubstance use and demonstrated that ACT showed greater results than CBT in abstinence rates.”

    From Psychosocial Interventions for Prisoners with Mental and Substance Use Disorders: A Systematic Review (2022) · cites this paper as [21]

    The Results (§4.3.2; page unavailable) describe a comparison of motivational intervention (MI) with educational intervention (EI), not ACT with CBT, and report that study condition did not significantly predict abstinence. The Abstract likewise identifies inmates with alcohol use disorders as the study population; it does not describe a trial of ACT versus CBT for prisoners with polysubstance use. (LLM, conf=0.90)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • The included studies were heterogeneous in outcome variables, outcome assessment, and intervention duration, so meta-analysis was not conducive.

    “though interventions were similar in a few studies,17–21 the outcome variables, outcome assessment, and duration of the intervention were heterogeneous and therefore not conducive for a meta-analysis.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. First MB Spitzer RL Gibbons M Williams JBW Structured clinical interview for the DSM-IV-TR: Axis I disorders, research version, patient edition (SCID-I/P) 2002 Biometrics Research, New York State Psychiatric Institute New York, NY
  2. Owens MD Zywiak WH Replication of psychometric properties and predictive validity of the IPDA International Journal of Alcohol and Drug Research in press
  3. Sobell LC Sobell MB Litten RZ Allen J Timeline followback: A technique for assessing self-reported alcohol Consumption Measuring alcohol consumption: Psychosocial and biological methods 1992 41 72 Humana Press Totowa, New Jersey

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Owens, M. D., & McCrady, B. S.
Affiliations
University of New Mexico (US)
Corresponding author
Owens, Mandy D.
Venue
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
68
Pages
1-10
ISSN
0740-5472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2401132290
Cited by
23
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.50
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (F31-AA023414)
  • Graduate Professional and Student Association at the University of New Mexico
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
motivational interventions, alcoholism, incarcerated individuals, jail inmates, brief intervention, treatment attendance, alcohol and drug use, social networks, relapse, abstinence, incarcerated men
MeSH terms
Adult, Alcohol Drinking, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Prisoners, Prisons, Social Support, Treatment Outcome, Substance-Related Disorders, Alcohol-Related Disorders, Young Adult, Motivational Interviewing, Alcohol Abstinence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review