Cited by 71Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and ApplicationsParallel Computing and Optimization TechniquesComputer Graphics and Visualization Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 42 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

High-performance iterative electron tomography reconstruction with long-object compensation using graphics processing units (GPUs)

Open access
Xu, Wei, Xu, Fang, Jones, Mel, Keszthelyi, Bettina, Sedat, John, Agard, David, Mueller, Klaus·2010·Journal of Structural Biology

Abstract

Iterative reconstruction algorithms pose tremendous computational challenges for 3D Electron Tomography (ET). Similar to X-ray Computed Tomography (CT), graphics processing units (GPUs) offer an affordable platform to meet these demands. In this paper, we outline a CT reconstruction approach for ET that is optimized for the special demands and application setting of ET. It exploits the fact that ET is typically cast as a parallel-beam configuration, which allows the design of an efficient data management scheme, using a holistic sinogram-based representation. Our method produces speedups of about an order of magnitude over a previously proposed GPU-based ET implementation, on similar hardware, and completes an iterative 3D reconstruction of practical problem size within minutes. We also describe a novel GPU-amenable approach that effectively compensates for reconstruction errors resulting from the TEM data acquisition on (long) samples which extend the width of the parallel TEM beam. We show that the vignetting artifacts typically arising at the periphery of non-compensated ET reconstructions are completely eliminated when our method is employed.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsb.2010.03.018

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Herraiz ve diğerleri [25] pozitron emisyon tomografisi görüntülerini ileri ve geri projeksiyon yöntemi ile geriçatmış ve GPU ile CPU'ya göre 72 kata kadar hızlandırmışlardır.

    “Herraiz ve diğerleri [25] ise çalışmalarında pozitron emisyon tomografisi ile elde edilen görüntüleri ileri ve geri projeksiyon yöntemini kullanarak geriçatmaktadırlar. Bu işlemi GPU ile CPU'ya göre 72 kata kadar hızlandırmışlardır.”

    From GPU Programlamada CUDA Platformu Kullanılan Paralel Görüntü İşleme Çalışmalarının İncelenmesi (2020) · cites this paper as [25]

    The Results section identifies the reconstructed data as electron-microscopy images of a virus and a brain synapse, not positron-emission tomography images. The Methods section does describe GPU-accelerated forward and back projection, but the cited paper is by Xu and colleagues, not Herraiz and colleagues, and its performance discussion does not report the claimed 72-fold GPU-versus-CPU speedup. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • İncelenen görüntü geriçatma çalışmalarında ileri ve geri izdüşüm yöntemi CUDA ile paralelleştirmede en çok kullanılan yöntemdir.

    “İncelenen çalışmalarda görüntü geriçatmada ileri ve geri izdüşüm yönteminin CUDA ile paralelleştirmede en çok kullanılan yöntem olduğu görülmektedir [22, 23, 24, 25].”

    From GPU Programlamada CUDA Platformu Kullanılan Paralel Görüntü İşleme Çalışmalarının İncelenmesi (2020) · cites this paper as [25]

    Section 3.1 describes parallelizing forward and back projection for image reconstruction. But the Introduction states that this paper’s implementation uses GLSL, not CUDA, and the paper does not establish that this is the most commonly used CUDA approach among the studies reviewed by the citing authors. Our copy provides no page numbers for these passages. (LLM, conf=0.87)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Xu, F., Mueller, K., Jones, M., Keszthelyi, B., Sedat, J., Agard, D., 2008. “On the Efficiency of Iterative Ordered Subset Reconstruction Algorithms for Acceleration on GPUs,” MICCAI (Workshop on High-Performance Medical Image Computing and Computer Aided Intervention), New York.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Xu, W., Xu, F., Jones, M., Keszthelyi, B., Sedat, J., Agard, D., & Mueller, K.
Affiliations
  • Stony Brook University (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
Corresponding author
Mueller, Klaus
Venue
Journal of Structural Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-08
Volume
171
Issue
2
Pages
142-153
ISSN
1047-8477 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2126753599
Cited by
71
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 8
FWCI
5.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Structural Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • W. M. Keck Foundation
  • National Institutes of Health (5r21eb004099-02)
  • National Institute of General Medical Sciences (GM 31627, R01GM031627)
  • National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (R21 EB004099, R21 EB004099-01)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Hardware and Architecture › Parallel Computing and Optimization Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Graphics and Computer-Aided Design › Computer Graphics and Visualization Techniques
Keywords
electron tomography, iterative reconstruction, GPU acceleration, parallel-beam tomography, 3D reconstruction
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Electron Microscope Tomography

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review