Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 192

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The advantages of co-culture over mono cell culture in simulating in vivo environment

Miki, Yasuhiro, Ono, Katsuhiko, Hata, Shuko, Suzuki, Takashi, Kumamoto, Hiroyuki, Sasano, Hironobu·2012·The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
DOI 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.12.004
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.12.004

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 61

  1. Miki, 2009, Intracrinology of sex steroids in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of human breast: comparison to invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and non-neoplastic breast, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol., 114, 68, 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2008.12.021 · DOI
  2. Sasano, 1998, Intratumoral aromatase in human breast, endometrial, and ovarian malignancies, Endocr. Rev., 19, 593
  3. Miki, 2007, Controversies of aromatase localization in human breast cancer – stromal versus parenchymal cells, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol., 106, 97, 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2007.05.007 · DOI
  4. Miki, 2007, Aromatase localization in human breast cancer tissues: possible interactions between intratumoral stromal and parenchymal cells, Cancer Res., 67, 3945, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-3105 · DOI
  5. Finak, 2008, Stromal gene expression predicts clinical outcome in breast cancer, Nat. Med., 14, 518, 10.1038/nm1764 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Paget, 1889, The distribution of secondary growths in cancer of the breast, The Lancet, 1, 571, 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)49915-0 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Hsu, 1976, Genetic characteristics of the HeLa cell, Science, 191, 392, 10.1126/science.1246620 · DOI
  8. Soule, 1973, A human cell line from a pleural effusion derived from a breast carcinoma, J. Natl. Cancer Inst., 51, 1409, 10.1093/jnci/51.5.1409 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Wenger, 2004, Comparison of established cell lines at different passages by karyotype and comparative genomic hybridization, Biosci. Rep., 24, 631, 10.1007/s10540-005-2797-5 · DOI
  10. Bloom, 1957, Histological grading and prognosis in breast cancer a study of 1409 cases of which 359 have been followed for 15 years, Br. J. Cancer, 11, 359, 10.1038/bjc.1957.43 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Elston, 1991, Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up, Histopathology, 19, 403, 10.1111/j.1365-2559.1991.tb00229.x · DOI · Paper page
  12. Barnard, 1987, Proliferative index in breast carcinoma determined in situ by Ki67 immunostaining and its relationship to clinical and pathological variables, J. Pathol., 152, 287, 10.1002/path.1711520407 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Leonardi, 1992, PCNA and Ki67 expression in breast carcinoma: correlations with clinical and biological variables, J. Clin. Pathol., 45, 416, 10.1136/jcp.45.5.416 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Ostman, 2009, Cancer-associated fibroblasts and tumor growth – bystanders turning into key players, Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev., 19, 67, 10.1016/j.gde.2009.01.003 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Martinez-Outschoorn, 2010, Autophagy in cancer associated fibroblasts promotes tumor cell survival: role of hypoxia, HIF1 induction and NFκB activation in the tumor stromal microenvironment, Cell Cycle, 9, 3515, 10.4161/cc.9.17.12928 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Bhowmick, 2004, Stromal fibroblasts in cancer initiation and progression, Nature, 432, 332, 10.1038/nature03096 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Hasebe, 1997, Fibrotic focus in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: a histopathological prognostic parameter for tumor recurrence and tumor death within three years after the initial operation, Jpn. J. Cancer Res., 88, 590, 10.1111/j.1349-7006.1997.tb00423.x · DOI · Paper page
  18. Hasebe, 2002, Prognostic significance of fibrotic focus in invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast: a prospective observational study, Mod. Pathol., 15, 502, 10.1038/modpathol.3880555 · DOI
  19. Van den Eynden, 2007, Fibrotic focus is a prognostic factor and a surrogate marker for hypoxia and (lymph) angiogenesis in breast cancer: review of the literature and proposal on the criteria of evaluation, Histopathology, 51, 440, 10.1111/j.1365-2559.2007.02761.x · DOI
  20. Colpaert, 2001, The presence of a fibrotic focus is an independent predictor of early metastasis in lymph node-negative breast cancer patients, Am. J. Surg. Pathol., 25, 1557, 10.1097/00000478-200112000-00016 · DOI
  21. Sadlonova, 2005, Breast fibroblasts modulate epithelial cell proliferation in three-dimensional in vitro co-culture, Breast Cancer Res., 7, R46, 10.1186/bcr949 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Sadlonova, 2009, Identification of molecular distinctions between normal breast-associated fibroblasts and breast cancer-associated fibroblasts, Cancer Microenviron., 2, 9, 10.1007/s12307-008-0017-0 · DOI
  23. Owen, 2004, T cell-derived matrix metalloproteinase-9 in breast cancer: friend or foe?, Breast Dis., 20, 145, 10.3233/BD-2004-20115 · DOI
  24. Ackerstaff, 2007, Anti-inflammatory agent indomethacin reduces invasion and alters metabolism in a human breast cancer cell line, Neoplasia, 9, 222, 10.1593/neo.06673 · DOI
  25. Verjans, 2009, Dual role of macrophage migration inhibitory factor (MIF) in human breast cancer, BMC Cancer, 14, 230, 10.1186/1471-2407-9-230 · DOI
  26. Shih, 2006, Tumor-associated macrophage: its role in cancer invasion and metastasis, J. Cancer Mol., 2, 101
  27. Burdall, 2003, Breast cancer cell lines: friend or foe?, Breast Cancer Res., 5, 89, 10.1186/bcr577 · DOI · Paper page
  28. McCallum, 1996, Long-term culture of primary breast cancer in defined medium, Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 39, 247, 10.1007/BF01806153 · doi:10.1007/bf01806153
  29. Yamaguchi, 2005, Tumor–stromal interaction through the estrogen-signaling pathway in human breast cancer, Cancer Res., 65, 4653, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-04-3236 · DOI
  30. Mamidi, 2011, Co-culture of mesenchymal-like stromal cells derived from human foreskin permits long term propagation and differentiation of human embryonic stem cells, J. Cell. Biochem., 112, 1353, 10.1002/jcb.23052 · doi:10.1002/jcb.23052
  31. Cruickshank, 2004, Colonic epithelial cell mediated suppression of CD4 T cell activation, Gut, 53, 678, 10.1136/gut.2003.029967 · DOI
  32. Sharma, 2004, Augmented fumonisin B1 toxicity in co-cultures: evidence for crosstalk between macrophages and non-parenchymatous liver epithelial cells involving proinflammatory cytokines, Toxicology, 203, 239, 10.1016/j.tox.2004.06.017 · doi:10.1016/j.tox.2004.06.017
  33. Miki, 2010, Intratumoral localization of aromatase and interaction between stromal and parenchymal cells in the non-small cell lung carcinoma microenvironment, Cancer Res., 70, 6659, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-09-4653 · DOI
  34. De Wever, 2003, Role of tissue stroma in cancer cell invasion, J. Pathol., 200, 429, 10.1002/path.1398 · DOI · Paper page
  35. Suzuki, 2004, Direct cell–cell interaction enhances pro-MMP-2 production and activation in co-culture of laryngeal cancer cells and fibroblasts: involvement of EMMPRIN and MT1-MMP, Exp. Cell Res., 293, 259, 10.1016/j.yexcr.2003.10.010 · doi:10.1016/j.yexcr.2003.10.010
  36. Sasano, 1994, Immunolocalization of aromatase and other steroidogenic enzymes in human breast disorders, Hum. Pathol., 25, 530, 10.1016/0046-8177(94)90127-9 · DOI · Paper page
  37. Harada, 1998, Molecular analysis of aberrant expression of aromatase in breast cancer tissues, Breast Cancer Res. Treat., 49, S15, 10.1023/A:1006076101178 · DOI
  38. Sanderson, 2001, Effects of chloro-s-triazine herbicides and metabolites on aromatase activity in various human cell lines and on vitellogenin production in male carp hepatocytes, Environ. Health Perspect., 109, 1027, 10.1289/ehp.011091027 · DOI · Paper page
  39. Shields-Botella, 2005, Effect of nomegestrol acetate on estrogen biosynthesis and transformation in MCF-7 and T47-D breast cancer cells, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol, 93, 1, 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2004.11.004 · DOI
  40. Sun, 1997, Autocrine and paracrine actions of breast tumor aromatase. A three-dimensional cell culture study involving aromatase transfected MCF-7 and T-47D cells, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol., 63, 29, 10.1016/S0960-0760(97)00068-X · DOI
  41. Masri, 2010, Molecular characterization of aromatase inhibitor-resistant, tamoxifen-resistant and LTEDaro cell lines, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol., 118, 277, 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2009.10.011 · DOI
  42. Zhong, 2011, In vitro and in vivo effects of a cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitor nimesulide analog JCC76 in aromatase inhibitors-insensitive breast cancer cells, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol., 126, 10, 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.03.018 · doi:10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.03.018
  43. Hayashi, 2008, Estrogen signaling in cancer microenvironment and prediction of response to hormonal therapy, J. Steroid Biochem. Mol. Biol., 109, 201, 10.1016/j.jsbmb.2008.03.013 · DOI
  44. Takahashi-Shiga, 2009, Local biosynthesis of estrogen in human endometrial carcinoma through tumor–stromal cell interactions, Clin. Cancer Res., 15, 6028, 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-09-1013 · DOI
  45. Oh, 2004, Bone marrow stroma influences transforming growth factor-β production in breast cancer cells to regulate c-myc activation of the preprotachykinin-I gene in breast cancer cells, Cancer Res., 64, 6327, 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-03-3122 · doi:10.1158/0008-5472.can-03-3122
  46. Bhargava, 2005, EGFR gene amplification in breast cancer: correlation with epidermal growth factor receptor mRNA and protein expression and HER-2 status and absence of EGFR-activating mutations, Mod. Pathol., 18, 1027, 10.1038/modpathol.3800438 · DOI · Paper page
  47. Gumuskaya, 2010, EGFR expression and gene copy number in triple-negative breast carcinoma, Cancer Genet. Cytogenet., 203, 222, 10.1016/j.cancergencyto.2010.07.118 · DOI
  48. Massarweh, 2006, Resistance to endocrine therapy in breast cancer: exploiting estrogen receptor/growth factor signaling crosstalk, Endocr. Relat. Cancer, 13, S15, 10.1677/erc.1.01273 · DOI · Paper page
  49. Ghayad, 2010, Endocrine resistance associated with activated ErbB system in breast cancer cells is reversed by inhibiting MAPK or PI3K/Akt signaling pathways, Int. J. Cancer, 126, 545, 10.1002/ijc.24750 · DOI
  50. Van den Eynden, 2007, Differential expression of hypoxia and (lymph) angiogenesis-related genes at different metastatic sites in breast cancer, Clin. Exp. Metastasis, 24, 13, 10.1007/s10585-006-9049-3 · DOI
  51. McLeskey, 1993, Fibroblast growth factor 4 transfection of MCF-7 cells produces cell lines that are tumorigenic and metastatic in ovariectomized or tamoxifen-treated athymic nude mice, Cancer Res., 53, 2168
  52. Ree, 1997, High levels of messenger RNAs for tissue inhibitors of metalloproteinases (TIMP-1 and TIMP-2) in primary breast carcinomas are associated with development of distant metastases, Clin. Cancer Res., 3, 1623
  53. Taube, 2006, TIMP-1 regulation of cell cycle in human breast epithelial cells via stabilization of p27(KIP1) protein, Oncogene, 25, 3041, 10.1038/sj.onc.1209336 · DOI
  54. Quiros, 2008, Ovarian normal and tumor-associated fibroblasts retain in vivo stromal characteristics in a 3-D matrix-dependent manner, Gynecol. Oncol., 110, 99, 10.1016/j.ygyno.2008.03.006 · DOI
  55. LeCluyse, 2001, Human hepatocyte culture systems for the in vitro evaluation of cytochrome P450 expression and regulation, Eur. J. Pharm. Sci., 13, 343, 10.1016/S0928-0987(01)00135-X · DOI · Paper page
  56. Liu, 2007, Functional three-dimensional HepG2 aggregate cultures generated from an ultrasound trap: comparison with HepG2 spheroids, J. Cell. Biochem., 102, 1180, 10.1002/jcb.21345 · DOI
  57. Nishimura, 2010, Secretion of albumin and induction of CYP1A2 and CYP3A4 in novel three-dimensional culture system for human hepatocytes using micro-space plate, Drug Metab. Pharmacokinet., 25, 236, 10.2133/dmpk.25.236 · DOI
  58. Phan, 2004, Interaction between osteoblast and osteoclast: impact in bone disease, Histol. Histopathol., 19, 1325
  59. Anderson, 1997, A homologue of the TNF receptor and its ligand enhance T-cell growth and dendritic-cell function, Nature, 390, 175, 10.1038/36593 · DOI · Paper page
  60. Dougall, 1999, RANK is essential for osteoclast and lymph node development, Genes Dev., 13, 2412, 10.1101/gad.13.18.2412 · DOI · Paper page
  61. Tortelli, 2009, Osteoblast and osteoclast differentiation in an in vitro three-dimensional model of bone, Tissue Eng. A, 15, 2373, 10.1089/ten.tea.2008.0501 · DOI

Cited by

See all 192

Metadata

Authors
Miki, Y., Ono, K., Hata, S., Suzuki, T., Kumamoto, H., & Sasano, H.
Venue
The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
131
Issue
3-5
Pages
68-75
ISSN
0960-0760 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.12.004
OpenAlex
W2110150885
Cited by
192
References
3
FWCI
4.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
  • www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
  • www.elsevier.com/legal/tdmrep-license (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The advantages of co-culture over mono cell culture in simulating in vivo environment. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.12.004
The paper
Miki, Y., Ono, K., Hata, S., Suzuki, T., Kumamoto, H., & Sasano, H. (2012). The advantages of co-culture over mono cell culture in simulating in vivo environment. The Journal of Steroid Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsbmb.2011.12.004

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.