CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 220

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A dynamic usage based perspective on L2 writing

Verspoor, Marjolijn, Schmid, Monika S., Xu, Xiaoyan·2012·Journal of Second Language Writing
DOI 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.007
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.007

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 1 references

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Bassano, 2007, Modeling continuity and discontinuity in utterance length: A quantitative approach to changes, transitions and intra-individual variability in early grammatical development, Developmental Science, 10, 588, 10.1111/j.1467-7687.2006.00629.x · DOI
  2. Bayley, 1999, The primacy of aspect hypothesis revisited: Evidence from language shift, Southwest Journal of Linguistics, 18, 1
  3. Caspi, T. (2010). A dynamic perspective on second language development. Doctoral dissertation. Retrieved from: http://irs.ub.rug.nl/ppn/329338412.
  4. de Angelis, G., & Jessner, U. (in press). Writing across languages in a bilingual context: A dynamic systems theory perspective. In R. Manchon (Ed.), L2 writing development: Multiple perspectives. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
  5. de Bot, 2007, A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition, Bilingualism, Language and Cognition, 10, 7, 10.1017/S1366728906002732 · DOI
  6. Grant, 2000, Using computer-tagged linguistic features to describe L2 writing differences, Journal of Second Language Writing., 9, 123, 10.1016/S1060-3743(00)00019-9 · DOI
  7. Hu, 1982, Some linguistic differences in the written English of Chinese and Australian students, Language Learning and Communication, 1, 39
  8. Jarvis, 2003, Exploring multiple profiles of highly rated learner compositions, Journal of Second Language Writing., 12, 377, 10.1016/j.jslw.2003.09.001 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Kops Hagedoorn, S. (2009). Yes or no: Do you know? Paul Meara's English as a foreign language vocabulary test as a predictor of general foreign language proficiency. Master's thesis, University of Groningen, Groningen, NL.
  10. Larsen-Freeman, 1976, An explanation for the morpheme acquisition order of second language learners, Language Learning, 26, 125, 10.1111/j.1467-1770.1976.tb00264.x · DOI · Paper page
  11. Larsen-Freeman, 2006, The emergence of complexity, fluency and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English, Applied Linguistics, 27, 590, 10.1093/applin/aml029 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Laufer, 1995, Vocabulary size and use: Lexical richness in L2 written production, Applied Linguistics, 16, 307, 10.1093/applin/16.3.307 · DOI · Paper page
  13. MacWhinney, 1990, The child language data exchange system: An update, Journal of Child Language, 17, 457, 10.1017/S0305000900013866 · DOI
  14. Norris, 2009, Towards an organic approach to investigating CAF in instructed SLA: The case of complexity, Applied Linguistics, 30, 555, 10.1093/applin/amp044 · DOI
  15. Ortega, 2003, Syntactic complexity measures and their relationship to L2 proficiency: A research synthesis of college-level L2 writing, Applied Linguistics, 24, 492, 10.1093/applin/24.4.492 · DOI
  16. Reynolds, D. W. (2002). Linguistic and cognitive development in the writing of middle-grade English language learners. Southwest Journal of Linguistics. Linguistic Association of the Southwest. HighBeam Research. http://www.highbeam.com Accessed 12.10.11.
  17. Robinson, 1998, Disentangling early language development: Modeling lexical and grammatical acquisition using and extension of case-study methodology, Developmental Psychology, 34, 363, 10.1037/0012-1649.34.2.363 · DOI
  18. Siegler, 2002, A microgenetic/cross-sectional study of matrix completion: Comparing short-term and long-term change, Child Development, 73, 793, 10.1111/1467-8624.00439 · DOI
  19. Smiskova, H., & Verspoor, M. (in press). Development of chunks in Dutch L2 learners of English. In J. Evers-Vermeul, L. Rasier & E. Tribushinina (Eds.), Usage-based approaches to language acquisition and language teaching. Berlin, GE: Mouton de Gruyter.
  20. Sparks, 2009, Long-term relationships among early first language skills, second language aptitude, second language affect, and later second language proficiency, Applied Psycholinguistics, 30, 725, 10.1017/S0142716409990099 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Spoelman, 2010, Dynamic patterns in development of accuracy and complexity: A longitudinal case study in the acquisition of Finnish, Applied Linguistics, 31, 532, 10.1093/applin/amq001 · DOI
  22. van Dijk, 2007, Wobbles, humps and sudden jumps: A case study of continuity, discontinuity and variability in early language development, Infant and Child Development, 16, 7, 10.1002/icd.506 · DOI
  23. Verspoor, 2011, The role of input and scholastic aptitude in second language development, TTWiA (Toegepaste taalwetenschap in artikelen), 86, 47, 10.1075/ttwia.86.06ver · DOI
  24. Verspoor, 2008, Variability in second language development from a dynamic systems perspective, The Modern Language Journal, 92, 214, 10.1111/j.1540-4781.2008.00715.x · DOI
  25. Verspoor, M., & van Dijk, M. (in press). Variability in a dynamic systems approach to second language acquisition. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of Applied Linguistics. Oxford, UK: Wiley-Blackwell. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 220

Metadata

Authors
Verspoor, M., Schmid, M. S., & Xu, X.
Venue
Journal of Second Language Writing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
21
Issue
3
Pages
239-263
ISSN
1060-3743
DOI
10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.007
Cited by
220
References
1
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A dynamic usage based perspective on L2 writing. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.007
The paper
Verspoor, M., Schmid, M. S., & Xu, X. (2012). A dynamic usage based perspective on L2 writing. Journal of Second Language Writing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jslw.2012.03.007