The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Single-item teacher stress and coping measures: Concurrent and predictive validity and sensitivity to change
Abstract
This study examined the concurrent and predictive validity of single-item scales for assessing teacher stress and coping. Correlations between the stress and coping items and present and end-of-year teacher-reported burnout and self-efficacy generally aligned with hypotheses, with stronger associations between coping and burnout and self-efficacy in comparison to the associations between stress and burnout and self-efficacy. Stress and coping items also predicted concurrent and future emotional exhaustion controlling for covariates; however, only coping consistently predicted additional variance in future emotional exhaustion with both stress and coping items in the model. Further, the coping item, not the stress item, demonstrated sensitivity to detect intervention effects; that is, teachers randomly assigned to receive a classroom management intervention (the Incredible Years Teacher Classroom Management program) had significantly higher coping scores compared to a wait-list comparison group. The results of this study provide support for the continued use of single-item stress and coping measures of teacher well-being, and areas for further research and potential use of these measures are discussed.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Single item measures of coping have been introduced to shorten questionnaires and when questions are concise and clear have shown considerable reliability and validity.”
From Parenthood during the COVID‐19 pandemic: Post‐traumatic growth amongst university students (2023) · cites this paper as Eddy et al. (2019)
Citations
Cites
Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change
Bandura, A. (1977) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.84.2.191 · Cited by 43,925
The measurement of experienced burnout
Maslach, C., & Jackson, S. E. (1981) · Journal of Organizational Behavior · doi:10.1002/job.4030020205 · Cited by 14,496
Maslach, C., Schaufeli, W. B., & Leiter, M. P. (2001) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.397 · Cited by 12,852
Assessing coping strategies: A theoretically based approach.
Carver, C. S., Scheier, M. F., & Weintraub, J. K. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.2.267 · Cited by 11,507
(1996) · Consulting Psychologists Press eBooks · Cited by 7,863
Teacher efficacy: capturing an elusive construct
Tschannen-Moran, M., & Hoy, A. W. (2001) · Teaching and Teacher Education · doi:10.1016/s0742-051x(01)00036-1 · Cited by 6,839
Jennings, P. A., & Greenberg, M. T. (2009) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/0034654308325693 · Cited by 3,686
Overall job satisfaction: How good are single-item measures?
Wanous, J. P., Reichers, A. E., & Hudy, M. J. (1997) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.82.2.247 · Cited by 3,479
Transactional theory and research on emotions and coping
Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1987) · European Journal of Personality · doi:10.1002/per.2410010304 · Cited by 3,053
Teacher Turnover and Teacher Shortages: An Organizational Analysis
Ingersoll, R. M. (2001) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/00028312038003499 · Cited by 2,989
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Single Item Measures in Psychological Science
Allen, M. S., Iliescu, D., & Greiff, S. (2022) · European Journal of Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1027/1015-5759/a000699 · Cited by 1,125
Canadian teachers’ attitudes toward change, efficacy, and burnout during the COVID-19 pandemic
Sokal, L. J., Trudel, L. E., & Babb, J. C. (2020) · International Journal of Educational Research Open · doi:10.1016/j.ijedro.2020.100016 · Cited by 555
Variability of teachers’ technology integration in the classroom: A matter of utility!
Backfisch, I., Lachner, A., Stürmer, K., & Scheiter, K. (2021) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2021.104159 · Cited by 312
Pânişoară, I. O., Lazăr, I., Pânişoară, G., Chirca, R., & Ursu, A. S. (2020) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph17218002 · Cited by 313
Sokal, L. J., Trudel, L. E., & Babb, J. C. (2020) · International Journal of Contemporary Education · doi:10.11114/ijce.v3i2.4931 · Cited by 244
Metadata
- Authors
- Eddy, C. L., Herman, K. C., & Reinke, W. M.
- Affiliations
- University of Missouri (US)
- Corresponding author
- Eddy, Colleen L.
- Venue
- Journal of School Psychology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 76
- Pages
- 17-32
- ISSN
- 0022-4405 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2964350853
- Cited by
- 120
- References
- 73
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1
- FWCI
- 13.92
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of School Psychology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Institute of Education Sciences
- University of Missouri
- U.S. Department of Education (R305A100342)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Burnout
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
- Keywords
- teacher stress, teacher coping, single-item measures, teacher burnout, teacher self-efficacy, emotional exhaustion, teacher well-being, sensitivity to change
- MeSH terms
- Teacher Training, School Teachers, Occupational Stress, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Education, Continuing, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychological Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity, Midwestern United States, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome, Self Efficacy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
