CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 122Stress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and BurnoutStudent Stress and Coping

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 70 of the 73 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Single-item teacher stress and coping measures: Concurrent and predictive validity and sensitivity to change

Eddy, Colleen L., Herman, Keith C., Reinke, Wendy M.·2019·Journal of School Psychology
DOI 10.1016/j.jsp.2019.05.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

This study examined the concurrent and predictive validity of single-item scales for assessing teacher stress and coping. Correlations between the stress and coping items and present and end-of-year teacher-reported burnout and self-efficacy generally aligned with hypotheses, with stronger associations between coping and burnout and self-efficacy in comparison to the associations between stress and burnout and self-efficacy. Stress and coping items also predicted concurrent and future emotional exhaustion controlling for covariates; however, only coping consistently predicted additional variance in future emotional exhaustion with both stress and coping items in the model. Further, the coping item, not the stress item, demonstrated sensitivity to detect intervention effects; that is, teachers randomly assigned to receive a classroom management intervention (the Incredible Years Teacher Classroom Management program) had significantly higher coping scores compared to a wait-list comparison group. The results of this study provide support for the continued use of single-item stress and coping measures of teacher well-being, and areas for further research and potential use of these measures are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsp.2019.05.001

Cites

70 of 70 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

3 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 122

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Eddy, C. L., Herman, K. C., & Reinke, W. M.
Affiliations
University of Missouri (US)
Corresponding author
Eddy, Colleen L.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of School Psychology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-10
Volume
76
Pages
17-32
ISSN
0022-4405 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jsp.2019.05.001
OpenAlex
W2964350853
Cited by
120
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 1
FWCI
13.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of School Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Institute of Education Sciences
  • University of Missouri
  • U.S. Department of Education (R305A100342)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Student Stress and Coping
Keywords
teacher stress, teacher coping, single-item measures, teacher burnout, teacher self-efficacy, emotional exhaustion, teacher well-being, sensitivity to change
MeSH terms
Teacher Training, School Teachers, Occupational Stress, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Education, Continuing, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Psychological Tests, Sensitivity and Specificity, Midwestern United States, Reproducibility of Results, Treatment Outcome, Self Efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review