Cited by 34Trauma and Emergency Care StudiesEmergency and Acute Care StudiesHospital Admissions and Outcomes

Factors associated with the interhospital transfer of emergency general surgery patients

Open access
Ingraham, Angela, Wang, Xing, Havlena, Jeffrey, Hanlon, Bret, Saucke, Megan, Schumacher, Jessica, Fernandes-Taylor, Sara, Greenberg, Caprice·2019·Journal of Surgical Research

Abstract

Background Transferred emergency general surgery (EGS) patients constitute a highly vulnerable, acutely ill population. Guidelines to facilitate timely, appropriate EGS transfers are lacking. We determined patient- and hospital-level factors associated with interhospital EGS transfers, a critical first step to identifying which patients may require transfer.Methods Adult EGS patients (defined by American Association for the Surgery of Trauma International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision diagnosis codes) were identified within the 2008-2013 Nationwide Inpatient Sample (n = 17,175,450). Patient- and hospital-level factors were examined as predictors of transfer to another acute care hospital with a multivariate proportional cause-specific hazards model with a competing risk analysis to assess the effect of risk factors for transfer.Results 1.8% of encounters resulted in a transfer (n = 318,286). Transferred patients were on average 62 y old and most commonly had Medicare (52.9% [n = 168,363]), private (26.7% [n = 84,991]), or Medicaid insurance (10.8% [n = 34,279]). 67.7% were white. The most common EGS diagnoses among transferred patients were related to hepatic-pancreatic-biliary (n = 90,989 [28.6%]) and upper gastrointestinal tract (n = 60,088 [18.9%]) conditions. Most transferred patients (n = 269,976 [84.8%]) did not have a procedure before transfer. Transfer was more likely if patients were in small (hazard ratio 2.52, 95% confidence interval 2.28-2.79) or medium (1.32, 1.21-1.44) versus large facilities, government (1.19, 1.11-1.28) versus private facilities, and rural (4.58, 3.98-5.27) or urban nonteaching (1.89, 1.70-2.10) versus urban teaching facilities. Patient-level factors were not strong predictors of transfer.Conclusions We identified that hospital-level characteristics more strongly predicted the need for transfer than patient-related factors. Consideration of these factors by providers as care is delivered in the context of the resources and capabilities of local institutions may facilitate transfer decision-making.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jss.2018.11.053

Cites

31 of 31 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [30]Delgado MK, Yokell MA, Staudenmayer KL, Spain DA, Hernandez-Boussard T, Wang NE. Factors associated with the disposition of severely injured patients initially seen at non-trauma center emergency departments: disparities by insurance status. JAMA surgery. 2014; 149(5): 422– 430. 24554059 PMC4422057
  2. [37]Wheatley B, Institute of Medicine (U.S.). Planning Committee on Regionalizing Emergency Care Service. Regionalizing emergency care: workshop summary Future of emergency care. Washington, D.C: National Academies Press,; 2010: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12872. 25032385

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ingraham, A., Wang, X., Havlena, J., Hanlon, B., Saucke, M., Schumacher, J., Fernandes-Taylor, S., & Greenberg, C.
Affiliations
University of Wisconsin–Madison (US)
Corresponding author
Ingraham, Angela
Venue
Journal of Surgical Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
240
Pages
191-200
ISSN
0022-4804 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2937548897
Cited by
34
References
31
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6
FWCI
5.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Surgical Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (1K08HS025224-01A1)
  • Clinical and Translational Science Award (CTSA) program
  • National Institutes of Health (NIH) National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (UL1TR002373)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Trauma and Emergency Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Emergency and Acute Care Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Emergency Medicine › Hospital Admissions and Outcomes
Keywords
emergency general surgery, interhospital transfer, hospital factors, hospital size, teaching hospitals, rural hospitals, public hospitals, biliary surgery, upper gastrointestinal surgery, patient vulnerability, competing risks
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Decision Making, Organizational, Emergency Service, Hospital, Female, Medicare, Hospitals, Humans, Male, Medicaid, Middle Aged, Patient Transfer, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Surgical Procedures, Operative, United States, Insurance Coverage, Quality Improvement

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review