CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 35Vibration Control and Rheological FluidsStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisSeismic Performance and Analysis

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Development of optimal design formula for bi-tuned mass dampers using multi-objective optimization

Ok, Seung-Yong, Song, Junho, Park, Kwan-Soon·2009·Journal of Sound and Vibration
DOI 10.1016/j.jsv.2008.11.023
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsv.2008.11.023

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 25

  1. Brock, 1946, A note on the damped vibration absorber, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 13, A-284, 10.1115/1.4009588 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Warburton, 1980, Optimum absorber parameters for simple systems, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 8, 197, 10.1002/eqe.4290080302 · DOI
  3. Warburton, 1982, Optimum absorber parameters for various combination of response and excitation parameters, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 10, 381, 10.1002/eqe.4290100304 · DOI
  4. Fujino, 1993, Design formulas for tuned mass dampers based on a perturbation technique, Journal of Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 22, 833, 10.1002/eqe.4290221002 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Tsai, 1993, Optimum tuned-mass dampers for minimizing steady-state response of support-excited and damped systems, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 22, 957, 10.1002/eqe.4290221104 · DOI
  6. Tsai, 1994, Explicit formulae for optimum absorber parameters for force excited and viscously damped system, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 176, 585, 10.1006/jsvi.1994.1400 · DOI
  7. Bakre, 2007, Optimum parameters of tuned mass damper for damped main system, Structural Control and Health Monitoring, 14, 448, 10.1002/stc.166 · DOI
  8. Iwanami, 1984, Optimum design of dual tuned mass dampers and their effectiveness, Proceedings of Japanese Society of Mechanical Engineering (C), 50, 44
  9. Jangid, 1999, Optimum multiple tuned mass dampers for base-excited undamped system, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 28, 1041, 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199909)28:9<1041::AID-EQE853>3.0.CO;2-E · DOI
  10. Li, 2000, Performance of multiple tuned mass dampers for attenuating undesirable oscillators of structures under the ground acceleration, Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, 29, 1405, 10.1002/1096-9845(200009)29:9<1405::AID-EQE976>3.0.CO;2-4 · DOI
  11. Park, 2001, Analysis of uniformly and linearly distributed mass dampers under harmonic and earthquake excitation, Engineering Structures, 23, 802, 10.1016/S0141-0296(00)00095-X · DOI
  12. Li, 2006, Estimating double tuned mass dampers for structures under ground acceleration using a novel optimum criterion, Journal of Sound and Vibration, 298, 280, 10.1016/j.jsv.2006.05.018 · DOI
  13. Fonseca, 1995, An overview of evolutionary algorithms in multiobjective optimization, Evolutionary Computation, 3, 1, 10.1162/evco.1995.3.1.1 · DOI
  14. M. Erickson, A. Mayer, J. Horn, The niched Pareto genetic algorithm 2 applied to the design of groundwater remediation systems, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-criterion Optimization, Springer, Zurich, Switzerland, March 2001, pp. 681–695. · DOI
  15. Srinivas, 1995, Multi-objective function optimization using non-dominated sorting genetic algorithms, Evolutionary Computation, 2, 221, 10.1162/evco.1994.2.3.221 · DOI · Paper page
  16. K. Deb, S. Agrawal, A. Pratap, T. Meyarivan, A fast elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization: non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II, Proceedings of the Parallel Problem Solving from Nature VI Conference, Paris, France, September 2000, pp. 849–858. · DOI
  17. Zitzler, 1999, Multiobjective optimization evolutionary algorithms: a comparative case study and the strength Pareto approach, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, 3, 257, 10.1109/4235.797969 · DOI
  18. Knowles, 2000, Approximating the nondominated front using the Pareto archived evolutionary strategy, Evolutionary Computation, 8, 149, 10.1162/106365600568167 · DOI
  19. D.W. Corne, J.D. Knowles, M.J. Oates, The Pareto envelope-based selection algorithm for multiobjective optimization, Proceedings of the Parallel Problem Solving from Nature VI Conference, Paris, France, September 2000, pp. 839–848. · DOI
  20. D.W. Corne, N.R. Jerram, J.D. Knowles, M.J. Oates, PESA-II: region based selection in evolutionary multiobjective optimization, Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference (GECCO’2001), San Francisco, California, 2001, pp. 283–290.
  21. C.A.C. Coello, G.T. Pulido, A Micro-genetic algorithm for multiobjective optimization, Proceedings of the First International Conference on Evolutionary Multi-criterion Optimization, Springer, Zurich, Switzerland, March 2001, pp. 126–140. · DOI
  22. Ok, 2008, Optimal design of hysteretic dampers connecting adjacent structures using multi-objective genetic algorithm and stochastic linearization method, Engineering Structures, 30, 1240, 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.07.019 · DOI
  23. More, 1977, The Levenberg–Marquardt algorithm: implementation and theory, Vol. 630, 105
  24. H. Tajimi, Statistical method of determining the maximum response of a building structure during an earthquake, Proceedings of Second World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vol. 2, Tokyo, Japan, February 1960, pp. 781–798.
  25. Der Kiureghian, 1980, Structural response to stationary excitation, Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division, 106, 1195, 10.1061/JMCEA3.0002659 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 35

Metadata

Authors
Ok, S.-Y., Song, J., & Park, K.-S.
Affiliations
  • University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
  • Dongguk University (KR)
Corresponding author
Song, Junho
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Sound and Vibration
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-04
Volume
322
Issue
1-2
Pages
60-77
ISSN
0022-460X (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jsv.2008.11.023
OpenAlex
W2021060847
Cited by
35
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
7.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Sound and Vibration (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Seismic Performance and Analysis
Keywords
multi-objective optimization, robust performance, nominal performance, frequency response function, bifurcation points, damping ratio, mass ratio, Pareto optimal solutions, building structures, seismic response control, stochastic dynamic analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review