Cited by 55Vibration Control and Rheological FluidsVibration and Dynamic AnalysisMechanical Engineering Research and Applications

Activation characteristic of a vibro-impact energy sink and its application to chatter control in turning

Open access
Li, T., Qiu, D., Seguy, S., Berlioz, A.·2017·Journal of Sound and Vibration

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsv.2017.05.033

Cites

24 of 24 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Li, T., Qiu, D., Seguy, S., & Berlioz, A.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Li, T.
Venue
Journal of Sound and Vibration
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
405
Pages
1-18
ISSN
0022-460X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2618470917
Cited by
55
References
24
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6
FWCI
6.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of Sound and Vibration (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • French Ministry of Science
  • Chinese Scholarship Council (201304490063)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Civil and Structural Engineering › Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Control and Systems Engineering › Vibration and Dynamic Analysis
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Mechanical Engineering Research and Applications
Keywords
chatter control, turning, nonlinear vibration control, nonlinear systems, vibration suppression

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review