Cited by 31Sexual function and dysfunction studiesSexual Assault and Victimization StudiesMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation

Why us? Perceived injustice is associated with more sexual and psychological distress in couples coping with genito-pelvic pain

Open access
Pâquet, Myriam, Bois, Katy, Rosen, Natalie O., Mayrand, Marie-Hélène, Charbonneau-Lefebvre, Véronique, Bergeron, Sophie·2016·The Journal of Sexual Medicine

Abstract

Introduction: Provoked vestibulodynia (PVD) is the most frequent cause of genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder (GPPPD) and is associated with negative psychological and sexual consequences for affected women and their partners. PVD is often misdiagnosed or ignored and many couples may experience a sense of injustice, due to the loss of their ability to have a normal sexual life. Perceiving injustice has been documented to have important consequences in individuals with chronic pain. However, no quantitative research has investigated the experience of injustice in this population. Aim: The aim of this study was to investigate the associations between perceived injustice and pain, sexual satisfaction, sexual distress, and depression among women with PVD and their partners. Methods: Women diagnosed with PVD (N = 50) and their partners completed questionnaires of perceived injustice, pain, sexual satisfaction, sexual distress, and depression. Main Outcome Measures: (1) Global Measure of Sexual Satisfaction Scale; (2) Female Sexual Distress Scale; (3) Beck Depression Inventory-II; and (4) McGill-Melzack Pain Questionnaire. Results: After controlling for partners' age, women's higher level of perceived injustice was associated with their own greater sexual distress, and the same pattern was found for partners. Women's higher level of perceived injustice was associated with their own greater depression, and the same pattern was found for partners. Women's higher perceived injustice was not associated with their own lower sexual satisfaction but partners' higher perceived injustice was associated with their own lower sexual satisfaction. Perceived injustice was not associated with women's pain intensity. Conclusion: Results suggest that perceiving injustice may have negative consequences for the couple's sexual and psychological outcomes. However, the effects of perceived injustice appear to be intra-individual. Targeting perceived injustice could enhance the efficacy of psychological interventions for women with PVD and their partners.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsxm.2015.11.007

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Keogh JP, Nuwayhid I, Gordon JL, Gucer PW. The impact of occupational injury on injured worker and family: outcomes of upper extremity cumulative trauma disorders in Maryland workers. American Journal of Industrial Medicine. 2000;38: 498-506.
  2. Steil JM, Turetsky BA. Is equal better? The relationship between marital equality and psychological symptomatology. Applied social psychology annual. 1987;7: 73-97.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pâquet, M., Bois, K., Rosen, N. O., Mayrand, M.-H., Charbonneau-Lefebvre, V., & Bergeron, S.
Affiliations
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • Dalhousie University (CA)
  • Université de Montréal   , Montreal, Quebec , Canada
Corresponding author
Pâquet, Myriam
Venue
The Journal of Sexual Medicine
Published
2016-01-01
Volume
13
Issue
1
Pages
79-87
ISSN
  • 1743-6095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1743-6109
OpenAlex
W2223746730
Cited by
30
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1
FWCI
2.96
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Sexual Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Papyrus : Institutional Repository (Université de Montréal) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  • Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
Keywords
provoked vestibulodynia, genito-pelvic pain/penetration disorder, perceived injustice, sexual distress, sexual satisfaction, depression, couples, pain intensity, chronic pain, psychological distress
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Depression, Dyspareunia, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Orgasm, Pain Measurement, Personal Satisfaction, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Behavior, Sexual Partners, Stress, Psychological, Pelvic Pain, Vulvodynia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review