Cited by 83Sexual function and dysfunction studiesGenital Health and DiseasePelvic floor disorders treatments

Psychosocial factors associated with pain and sexual function in women with Vulvodynia: a systematic review

Open access
Chisari, Claudia, Monajemi, Mani B., Scott, Whitney, Moss‐Morris, Rona, McCracken, Lance M.·2021·European Journal of Pain

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Vulvodynia is a prevalent chronic vulval pain condition affecting 10%-28% of women, and significantly impacting their health and quality of life. It is currently poorly understood and biomedical treatments achieve only modest benefits for pain and sexual functioning. A wider psychosocial conceptualization of this condition may improve outcomes. There is currently no coherent understanding of how psychosocial factors may contribute to outcomes in Vulvodynia. The aim of this review is to identify and systematically review psychosocial factors associated with pain and sexual outcomes and to inform a psychosocial model of Vulvodynia. DATABASES AND DATA TREATMENT: Observational/experimental studies reporting on the association between psychosocial factors and pain/sexual outcomes in adult women with Vulvodynia were eligible. Two reviewers independently conducted eligibility screening, data extraction and quality assessment. Twenty-one studies were included, all focused on women with Provoked Vestibulodynia (PVD). Most of the studies were low-to-medium quality. RESULTS/CONCLUSION: A range of general/pain-related distress and avoidance processes, and sex/intimacy avoidance or engagement processes were significantly associated with pain, sexual functioning or sexual distress and sexual satisfaction, supporting the role of a psychosocial approach to PVD. Depression, anxiety, catastrophizing, pain-anxiety, pain acceptance, body-exposure anxiety, attention to sexual cues, partner hostility and solicitousness, self-efficacy and penetration cognitions are highlighted as potentially important treatment targets in PVD. Due to the limited data available, developing a psychosocial model was not possible. Directions for future research include examining the replicability and generalizability of the factors identified, exploring differences/similarities across Vulvodynia subsets and testing tailored theoretically based treatments. SIGNIFICANCE: The systematic review highlights the role of psychosocial factors associated with pain and sexual functioning in Vulvodynia. The review findings reveal that Vulvodynia presents both similar and unique cognitive, behavioural and interpersonal features compared to other chronic pain conditions. There may be important roles for negative sexual cues, body image-related factors during intercourse, partner factors, self-efficacy beliefs and penetration cognitions, in relation to pain and sexual functioning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/ejp.1668

Cites

72 of 74 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A study including women with provoked and mixed/spontaneous Vulvodynia found that pain-acceptance and committed-action predicted greater emotional functioning and lower pain interference over three months.

    “a study that included women with provoked and mixed/spontaneous Vulvodynia (Chisari et al., 2021) found that pain-acceptance and committed-action predicted greater emotional functioning and lower pain interference over three months.”

    From Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for women living with Vulvodynia: A single-case experimental design study of a treatment delivered online (2022) · cites this paper as Chisari et al., 2021

    The Results section on pain acceptance reports an association between greater pain acceptance, lower intercourse pain, and higher sexual satisfaction in women with provoked vestibulodynia. It does not report committed action predicting emotional functioning or pain interference over three months. The Results overview also states that all women in the reviewed studies had provoked vestibulodynia and that the pain outcomes did not concern spontaneous pain. Page numbers are unavailable in our copy. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Cognitive behavioural factors are associated with experience of pain and sexual functioning.

    “Cognitive behavioural factors are associated with experience of pain and sexual functioning, suggesting that addressing emotional and sexual cognitive factors is important in vulvodynia management (Chisari and Chilcot, 2017; Chisari et al., 2021).”
  • Addressing emotional and sexual cognitive factors is important in vulvodynia management.

    “Cognitive behavioural factors are associated with experience of pain and sexual functioning, suggesting that addressing emotional and sexual cognitive factors is important in vulvodynia management (Chisari and Chilcot, 2017; Chisari et al., 2021).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 75 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Reissing, E. D., Laliberté, G. M., & Davis, H. J. (2005). Young women's sexual adjustment: The role of sexual self‐schema, sexual self‐efficacy, sexual aversion and body attitudes. The Canadian Journal of Human Sexuality, 14, 77.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chisari, C., Monajemi, M. B., Scott, W., Moss‐Morris, R., & McCracken, L. M.
Affiliations
  • Health Psychology Section Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology, and Neuroscience King’s College, London London UK
  • King's College London (GB)
  • Uppsala University (SE)
Corresponding author
McCracken, Lance M.
Venue
European Journal of Pain
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2020-10-19
Volume
25
Issue
1
Pages
39-50
ISSN
  • 1090-3801 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2149
OpenAlex
W3090263951
Cited by
83
References
75
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 20 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 1
FWCI
1.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Pain (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
  • Health Research
  • South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust
  • King’s College London
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Sexual function and dysfunction studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Genital Health and Disease
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Pelvic floor disorders treatments
Keywords
vulvodynia, provoked vestibulodynia, psychosocial factors, sexual function, sexual distress, sexual satisfaction, depression, anxiety, pain catastrophizing, pain acceptance, self-efficacy, intimacy avoidance, body image, sexual cues, psychosocial model
MeSH terms
Adult, Coitus, Female, Humans, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sexual Behavior, Vulvodynia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review