Cited by 581Lung Cancer Treatments and MutationsCancer Immunotherapy and BiomarkersLung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

A Phase II Study of Pembrolizumab in EGFR-Mutant, PD-L1+, Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Naïve Patients With Advanced NSCLC

Open access
Lisberg, A., Cummings, A., Goldman, J.W., Bornazyan, K., Reese, N., Wang, T., Coluzzi, P., Ledezma, B. +18 more·2018·Journal of Thoracic Oncology

Abstract

Background Despite the significant antitumor activity of pembrolizumab in NSCLC, clinical benefit has been less frequently observed in patients whose tumors harbor EGFR mutations compared to EGFR wild-type patients. Our single-center experience on the KEYNOTE-001 trial suggested that pembrolizumab-treated EGFR-mutant patients, who were tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) naïve, had superior clinical outcomes to those previously treated with a TKI. As TKI naïve EGFR-mutants have generally been excluded from pembrolizumab studies, data to guide treatment decisions in this patient population is lacking, particularly in patients with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥50%.Methods We conducted a phase II trial (NCT02879994) of pembrolizumab in TKI naive patients with EGFR mutation-positive, advanced NSCLC and PD-L1-positive (≥1%, 22C3 antibody) tumors. Pembrolizumab was administered 200 mg every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate. Secondary endpoints included safety of pembrolizumab, additional pembrolizumab efficacy endpoints, and efficacy and safety of an EGFR TKI after pembrolizumab.Results Enrollment was ceased due to lack of efficacy after 11 of 25 planned patients were treated. Eighty-two percent of trial patients were treatment naïve, 64% had sensitizing EGFR mutations, and 73% had PD-L1 expression ≥50%. Only 1 patient had an objective response (9%), but repeat analysis of this patient's tumor definitively showed the original report of an EGFR mutation to be erroneous. Observed treatment-related adverse events were similar to prior experience with pembrolizumab, but two deaths within 6 months of enrollment, including one attributed to pneumonitis, were of concern.Conclusions Pembrolizumab's lack of efficacy in TKI naïve, PD-L1+, EGFR-mutant patients with advanced NSCLC, including those with PD-L1 expression ≥50%, suggests that it is not an appropriate therapeutic choice in this setting.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.03.035

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [4]Hellmann MD MINI03.05 Efficacy of Pembrolizumab in Key Subgroups of Patients with Advanced NSCLC Journal of Thoracic Oncology 2015 10 9 S261 S406
  2. [13]Hu-Lieskovan S High Intratumoral T Cell Infi ltration Correlated with Mutational Load and Response to Pembrolizumab in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer 16th World Conference on Lung Cancer 2015 Denver, Colorado

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lisberg, A., Cummings, A., Goldman, J. W., Bornazyan, K., Reese, N., Wang, T., Coluzzi, P., Ledezma, B., Mendenhall, M., Hunt, J., Wolf, B., Jones, B., Madrigal, J., Horton, J., Spiegel, M., Carroll, J., Gukasyan, J., Williams, T., Sauer, L., Wells, C., Hardy, A., Linares, P., Lim, C., Ma, L., Adame, C., & Garon, E. B.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Garon, Edward B.
Venue
Journal of Thoracic Oncology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
13
Issue
8
Pages
1138-1145
ISSN
1556-0864 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2889653218
Cited by
580
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 29 · 2025: 63 · 2024: 78 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 81 · 2021: 87 · 2020: 78 · 2019: 71 · 2018: 19
FWCI
48.03
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Thoracic Oncology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
National Institutes of Health
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Treatments and Mutations
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer Immunotherapy and Biomarkers
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
pembrolizumab, EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer, PD-L1 expression, immune checkpoint inhibitors, objective response rate, treatment-related adverse events, pneumonitis, EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung, Female, Humans, Lung Neoplasms, Male, Middle Aged, Mutation, Protein Kinase Inhibitors, B7-H1 Antigen, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Humanized, ErbB Receptors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review