The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Active-transport walking behavior: destinations, durations, distances
Abstract
Abstract This paper fills a gap in our knowledge of active-transport (AT) walking, by presenting detailed aspects of walking behavior for a medium-sized North American city. It analyzes the frequency and length of walking episodes, categorized by origins, purposes, and destinations, and also investigates distance-decay functions for major destinations. The study employs day-after recall time diary and questionnaire data from the 2007–8 Space–Time Activity Research (STAR) survey conducted in Halifax, Canada. GPS co-ordinate data enhanced the accuracy of location information, start times, and end times of the 1790 AT walking episodes, while GIS software was used to compute a shortest-path distance between the origin and destination of each episode. Home is both the most common origin and destination for AT walks, and the most common purpose is travel-to-shop rather than travel-to-work. Most walks are to non-home locations, such as retail establishments and offices. Particularly important are restaurants and bars, grocery stores, shopping centers, banks, and other services. All major destinations show strong distance-decay effects: most walks are shorter than 600 m, and very few exceed 1200 m. The assumption employed in the walkability literature, that one should restrict the ‘neighborhood of opportunity’ to walking destinations within 1000 m of the home, is seen to be well justified. However, a planning policy focus on the walker’s home neighborhood is revealed as questionable, since the majority of walking trips do not originate from the home. The relationship between urban land-use patterns and walkability may therefore require some rethinking.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Built Environment Correlates of Walking: A Review
SAELENS, B. E., & HANDY, S. L. (2008) · Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · doi:10.1249/mss.0b013e31817c67a4 · Cited by 1,912
Development of the World Health Organization Global Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPAQ)
Armstrong, T., & Bull, F. (2006) · Journal of Public Health · doi:10.1007/s10389-006-0024-x · Cited by 1,727
Active commuting and cardiovascular risk: a meta-analytic review
Hamer, M., & Chida, Y. (2008) · Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2007.03.006 · Cited by 656
Toobert, D. J., Glasgow, R. E., Strycker, L. A., Barrera, M., Ritzwoller, D. P., & Weidner, G. (2007) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/1479-5868-4-1 · Cited by 255
Studies of time-use: problems and prospects
As, D. (1978) · Acta Sociologica · doi:10.1177/000169937802100203 · Cited by 169
Cited by
Gascon, M., Triguero-Mas, M., Martínez, D., Dadvand, P., Forns, J., Plasència, A., & Nieuwenhuijsen, M. (2015) · International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health · doi:10.3390/ijerph120404354 · Cited by 1,171
Higgs, G., Langford, M., & Norman, P. (2015) · Geoforum · doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2015.04.010 · Cited by 95
Hillsdon, M., Coombes, E., Griew, P., & Jones, A. (2015) · International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity · doi:10.1186/s12966-015-0260-y · Cited by 78
Composing Networks: Writing Practices on Mobile Devices
Swarts, J. (2016) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088316666807 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Millward, H., Spinney, J., & Scott, D.
- Venue
- Journal of Transport Geography
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-04
- Volume
- 28
- Pages
- 101-110
- ISSN
- 0966-6923 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2013271821
- Cited by
- 316
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 27.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Active-transport walking behavior: destinations, durations, distances. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.11.012
- The paper
- Millward, H., Spinney, J., & Scott, D. (2013). Active-transport walking behavior: destinations, durations, distances. Journal of Transport Geography. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.11.012
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.