Cited by 55Hormonal and reproductive studiesAdrenal Hormones and DisordersHypothalamic control of reproductive hormones

Performance of Total Testosterone Measurement to Predict Free Testosterone for the Biochemical Evaluation of Male Hypogonadism

Open access
Anawalt, Bradley D., Hotaling, James M., Walsh, Thomas J., Matsumoto, Alvin M.·2012·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Guidelines recommend serum total testosterone measurement as the initial test to evaluate male hypogonadism, reserving free testosterone assessment for men with suspected sex hormone-binding globulin abnormalities or total testosterone near the lower limit of normal. We determined the performance of total testosterone measurement as a test to identify men with normal vs low free testosterone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We examined the electronic medical records of all 3,672 men evaluated for hypogonadism by a serum testosterone panel, including total testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin, albumin and calculated free testosterone, from January 1, 1997 through December 31, 2007 in a network that serves veterans in Washington. RESULTS: The sensitivity and specificity of low total testosterone (less than 280 ng/dl) to rule out and predict low calculated free testosterone was 91.0% and 73.7%, respectively. At thresholds of less than 350 and less than 400 ng/dl the sensitivity of total testosterone for low calculated free testosterone increased to 96.8% and 98.2%, and at thresholds of less than 150 and less than 200 ng/dl specificity increased to 98.9% and 92.6%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Total testosterone between 280 and 350 ng/dl is not sensitive enough to reliably exclude hypogonadism. Total testosterone must exceed 350 to 400 ng/dl to reliably predict normal free testosterone. Except when levels are less than 150 ng/dl total testosterone measurement has low specificity for the biochemical diagnosis of hypogonadism.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.juro.2011.11.095

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In a cohort of 3672 men, total T had an AUC of 0.93 as a predictor of calculated free T, but 61.7% of subjects with decreased total T had normal calculated free T.

    “Overall, with an area under the receiver operator curve of 0.93, total T was, in general, found to be a good predictor of calculated free T. In contrast, however, 61.7% of cohort subjects with decreased total T levels had normal calculated free T [249].”
  • At total T of 280 ng/dL, sensitivity and specificity for predicting low calculated free T were 91.0% and 73.7%; sensitivity ≥95% only at total T 350 ng/dL, specificity ≥98% only at total T 150 ng/dL.

    “In this study, at the assays lower limit of normal (total T of 280 ng/dL), sensitivity and specificity of predicting low calculated free T were only 91.0 and 73.7%, respectively. Acceptable levels for sensitivity, 95.0% and up, were only acquired at a total T cut-off of 350 ng/dL, while on the other hand specificity only reached satisfactory levels of 98.0% and more at a total T cut-off of 150 ng”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Anawalt, B. D., Hotaling, J. M., Walsh, T. J., & Matsumoto, A. M.
Affiliations
University of Washington (US)
Corresponding author
Anawalt, Bradley D.
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
2012-04
Volume
187
Issue
4
Pages
1369-1373
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2031612883
Cited by
55
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 3
FWCI
4.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (5u54hd012629-31)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (U54HD042454, U54HD42454, U54-HD-12629, U54HD-012629)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
Keywords
male hypogonadism, total testosterone, free testosterone, sex hormone-binding globulin, sensitivity and specificity, veterans
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Humans, Hypogonadism, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Testosterone, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review