Cited by 183Hormonal and reproductive studiesProstate Cancer Treatment and ResearchProstate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment

Testosterone Replacement Therapy in Patients with Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy

Open access
Pastuszak, Alexander W., Pearlman, Amy M., Lai, Win Shun, Godoy, Guilherme, Sathyamoorthy, Kumaran, Liu, Joceline S., Miles, Brian J., Lipshultz, Larry I. +1 more·2013·Journal of Urology

Abstract

PURPOSE: Testosterone replacement therapy in men with prostate cancer is controversial, with concern that testosterone can stimulate cancer growth. We evaluated the safety and efficacy of testosterone in hypogonadal men with prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a review of 103 hypogonadal men with prostate cancer treated with testosterone after prostatectomy (treatment group) and 49 nonhypogonadal men with cancer treated with prostatectomy (reference group). There were 77 men with low/intermediate (nonhigh) risk cancer and 26 with high risk cancer included in the analysis. All men were treated with transdermal testosterone, and serum hormone, hemoglobin, hematocrit and prostate specific antigen were evaluated for more than 36 months. RESULTS: Median (IQR) patient age in the treatment group was 61.0 years (55.0-67.0), and initial laboratory results included testosterone 261.0 ng/dl (213.0-302.0), prostate specific antigen 0.004 ng/ml (0.002-0.007), hemoglobin 14.7 gm/dl (13.3-15.5) and hematocrit 45.2% (40.4-46.1). Median followup was 27.5 months, at which time a significant increase in testosterone was observed in the treatment group. A significant increase in prostate specific antigen was observed in the high risk and nonhigh risk treatment groups with no increase in the reference group. Overall 4 and 8 cases of cancer recurrence were observed in treatment and reference groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, testosterone therapy is effective and, while followed by an increase in prostate specific antigen, does not appear to increase cancer recurrence rates, even in men with high risk prostate cancer. However, given the retrospective nature of this and prior studies, testosterone therapy in men with history of prostate cancer should be performed with a vigorous surveillance protocol.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.002

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Limited data have demonstrated no significant increases in prostate cancer recurrence in men treated with testosterone compared to controls after radical prostatectomy.

    “Limited data have demonstrated no significant increases in prostate cancer recurrence in men treated with testosterone compared to controls”
  • An increase in PSA among men in high-risk groups receiving testosterone after radical prostatectomy has been shown.

    “although an increase in PSA among men in high-risk groups receiving testosterone has been shown”
  • Insufficiently powered studies that conclude safety of testosterone supplementation in men with prostate cancer are at risk of type-II errors and are not statistically supportable.

    “As such, insufficiently powered studies which conclude safety of T supplementation in men with prostate cancer are at risk of committing type-II errors and are not statistically supportable.143, 144”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 33 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Pastuszak, A. W., Pearlman, A. M., Lai, W. S., Godoy, G., Sathyamoorthy, K., Liu, J. S., Miles, B. J., Lipshultz, L. I., & Khera, M.
Affiliations
  • Baylor College of Medicine (US)
  • University of Pennsylvania (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
  • Houston Methodist (US)
Venue
Journal of Urology
Published
2013-08
Volume
190
Issue
2
Pages
639-644
ISSN
  • 0022-5347 (ISSN-L)
  • 1527-3792
OpenAlex
W2091445581
Cited by
183
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 18 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 15 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 27 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 6
FWCI
18.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • The Journal of Urology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (K23CA160664)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Treatment and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Keywords
testosterone replacement therapy, prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy, hypogonadism, transdermal testosterone, prostate-specific antigen, tumor recurrence, high-risk prostate cancer, low-risk prostate cancer, hemoglobin, hematocrit, hormone therapy safety
MeSH terms
Aged, Hematocrit, Hemoglobins, Humans, Hypogonadism, Male, Middle Aged, Prostatectomy, Prostatic Neoplasms, Retrospective Studies, Testosterone, Linear Models, Treatment Outcome, Prostate-Specific Antigen, Statistics, Nonparametric, Hormone Replacement Therapy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review