The DOI matches its Crossref record; 142 of the 147 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Impact of Interventions on Medication Adherence and Blood Pressure Control in Patients with Essential Hypertension: A Systematic Review by the ISPOR Medication Adherence and Persistence Special Interest Group
Open accessAbstract
Objectives To systematically review the evidence on the impact of interventions to improve medication adherence in adults prescribed antihypertensive medications.Methods An electronic search was undertaken of articles published between 1979 and 2009, without language restriction, that focused on interventions to improve antihypertensive medication adherence among patients (≥18 years) with essential hypertension. Studies must have measured adherence as an outcome of the intervention. We followed standard guidelines for the conduct and reporting of the review and conducted a narrative synthesis of reported data.Results Ninety-seven articles were identified for inclusion; 35 (35 of 97, 36.1%) examined interventions to directly improve medication adherence, and the majority (58 of 97, 59.8%) were randomized controlled trials. Thirty-four (34 of 97, 35.1%) studies reported a statistically significant improvement in medication adherence.Discussion/conclusions Interventions aimed at improving patients' knowledge of medications possess the greatest potential clinical value in improving adherence with antihypertensive therapy. However, we identified several limitations of these studies, and advise future researchers to focus on using validated adherence measures, well-designed randomized controlled trials with relevant adherence and clinical outcomes, and guidelines on the appropriate design and analysis of adherence research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“During the first year of treatment, the average patient has possession of antihypertensive medications only 50% of the time, and only 1 in 5 patients has sufficiently high adherence to achieve the benefits observed in clinical trials.98,99”
From Resistant Hypertension: Detection, Evaluation, and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2018) · cites this paper as [98]
In the citing paper
“During the first year of treatment, the average patient has possession of antihypertensive medications only 50% of the time, and only 1 in 5 patients has sufficiently high adherence to achieve the benefits observed in clinical trials.98,99”
From Resistant Hypertension: Detection, Evaluation, and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2018) · cites this paper as [98]
In the citing paper
“However, a quarter of patients who are newly initiated on antihypertensive therapy fail to fill their initial prescription.97,98”
From Resistant Hypertension: Detection, Evaluation, and Management: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association (2018) · cites this paper as [98]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Self-efficacy: The exercise of control
Bandura, A., Freeman, W. H., & Lightsey, R. (1999) · Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy · doi:10.1891/0889-8391.13.2.158 · Cited by 46,835
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA Statement.
(2009) · PubMed Central · Cited by 44,859
Self-efficacy: the exercise of control
(1997) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.35-1826 · Cited by 24,451
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.005 · Cited by 19,575
In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors.
Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.47.9.1102 · Cited by 8,596
Adherence to Long-Term Therapies: Evidence for Action
Geest, S. D., & Sabate, E. J. (2003) · European Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing · doi:10.1016/s1474-5151(03)00091-4 · Cited by 6,310
Interventions for enhancing medication adherence
Nieuwlaat, R., Wilczynski, N., Navarro, T., Hobson, N., Jeffery, R., Keepanasseril, A., Agoritsas, T., Mistry, N., Iorio, A., Jack, S., et al. (2014) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd000011.pub4 · Cited by 2,945
The theory of decision making.
Edwards, W. (1954) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/h0053870 · Cited by 2,710
Medication compliance and persistence: terminology and definitions
Cramer, J. A., Roy, A., Burrell, A., Fairchild, C. J., Fuldeore, M. J., Ollendorf, D. A., & Wong, P. K. (2008) · Value in Health · doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2007.00213.x · Cited by 2,220
Research works printed but not linked: 8
- Campbell, 1999, CMAJ, 160, S1
- Carvalho, 2007, Impact of community pharmacy based patient education, Ind J Pharm Educ Res, 41, 164
- Fleece, 1988, WJLO. Case reports; behavioral assessment and approaches, J Compliance Health Care, 3, 77
- Fujii, 1985, Compliance and compliance-improving strategies in hypertension: the Japanese experience, J Hypertens, 3, 19
- Gilbert, 1990, High levels of medication compliance and blood-pressure control among hypertensive patients attending community pharmacies, J Soc Adm Pharm, 7, 78
- Marquez Contreras, 2004, Effectiveness of an intervention to provide information to patients with hypertension as short text messages of reminders sent to their mobile phone (HTA-alert), Aten Primaria, 34, 399
- Marquez Contreras, 2009, Non-pharmacological intervention as a strategy to improve antihypertensive treatment compliance, Atencion Primaria, 41, 501
- Rudd, 1992, Compliance with medication timing: implications from a medication trial for drug development and clinical practice, J Clin Res Pharmacoepidemiol, 6, 15
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Whelton, P. K., Carey, R. M., Aronow, W. S., Casey, D. E., Collins, K. J., Dennison Himmelfarb, C., DePalma, S. M., Gidding, S., Jamerson, K. A., Jones, D. W., et al. (2018) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hyp.0000000000000065 · Cited by 7,391
Whelton, P. K., Carey, R. M., Aronow, W. S., Casey, D. E., Collins, K. J., Dennison Himmelfarb, C., DePalma, S. M., Gidding, S., Jamerson, K. A., Jones, D. W., et al. (2018) · Journal of the American College of Cardiology · doi:10.1016/j.jacc.2017.11.006 · Cited by 6,616
Carey, R. M., Calhoun, D. A., Bakris, G. L., Brook, R. D., Daugherty, S. L., Dennison-Himmelfarb, C. R., Egan, B. M., Flack, J. M., Gidding, S. S., Judd, E., et al. (2018) · Hypertension · doi:10.1161/hyp.0000000000000084 · Cited by 1,153
Whelton, P. K., Carey, R. M., Aronow, W. S., Casey, D. E., Collins, K. J., Dennison Himmelfarb, C., DePalma, S. M., Gidding, S., Jamerson, K. A., Jones, D. W., et al. (2018) · Circulation · doi:10.1161/cir.0000000000000596 · Cited by 1,127
Adherence in Hypertension: A Review of Prevalence, Risk Factors, Impact, and Management
Burnier, M., & Egan, B. M. (2019) · Circulation Research · doi:10.1161/circresaha.118.313220 · Cited by 878
Metadata
- Authors
- Gwadry-Sridhar, F. H., Manias, E., Lal, L., Salas, M., Hughes, D. A., Ratzki-Leewing, A., & Grubisic, M.
- Affiliations
- Western University (CA)
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- AstraZeneca (United States) (US)
- Bangor University (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Gwadry-Sridhar, Femida H.
- Venue
- Value in Health
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-07
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 863-871
- ISSN
- 1098-3015 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2042085280
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 147
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 24 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 1.62
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Value in Health (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Deakin Research Online (Deakin University) (submittedVersion)
- Figshare (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine › Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
- Keywords
- medication adherence, essential hypertension, antihypertensive therapy, adherence interventions, blood pressure control, medication knowledge, adherence measurement
- MeSH terms
- Essential Hypertension, Antihypertensive Agents, Blood Pressure, Humans, Hypertension, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Patient Education as Topic, Reminder Systems, Medication Adherence
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review