Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,218

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

An Economic Evaluation of the Impact, Cost, and Medicare Policy Implications of Chronic Nonhealing Wounds

Open access
Nussbaum, Samuel R., Carter, Marissa J., Fife, Caroline E., DaVanzo, Joan, Haught, Randall, Nusgart, Marcia, Cartwright, Donna·2018·Value in Health

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine the cost of chronic wound care for Medicare beneficiaries in aggregate, by wound type and by setting. METHODS: This retrospective analysis of the Medicare 5% Limited Data Set for calendar year 2014 included beneficiaries who experienced episodes of care for one or more of the following: arterial ulcers, chronic ulcers, diabetic foot ulcers, diabetic infections, pressure ulcers, skin disorders, skin infections, surgical wounds, surgical infections, traumatic wounds, venous ulcers, or venous infections. The main outcomes were the prevalence of each wound type, Medicare expenditure for each wound type and aggregate, and expenditure by type of service. RESULTS: Nearly 15% of Medicare beneficiaries (8.2 million) had at least one type of wound or infection (not pneumonia). Surgical infections were the largest prevalence category (4.0%), followed by diabetic infections (3.4%). Total Medicare spending estimates for all wound types ranged from $28.1 to $96.8 billion. Including infection costs, the most expensive estimates were for surgical wounds ($11.7, $13.1, and $38.3 billion), followed by diabetic foot ulcers ($6.2, $6.9, and $18.7 billion,). The highest cost estimates in regard to site of service were for hospital outpatients ($9.9-$35.8 billion), followed by hospital inpatients ($5.0-$24.3 billion). CONCLUSIONS: Medicare expenditures related to wound care are far greater than previously recognized, with care occurring largely in outpatient settings. The data could be used to develop more appropriate quality measures and reimbursement models, which are needed for better health outcomes and smarter spending for this growing population.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jval.2017.07.007

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. Chan, 2017, Cost-of-illness studies in chronic ulcers: a systematic review, J Wound Care, 26, S4, 10.12968/jowc.2017.26.Sup4.S4 · DOI
  2. Heyer, 2016, Epidemiology of chronic wounds in Germany: analysis of statutory health insurance data, Wound Repair Regen, 24, 434, 10.1111/wrr.12387 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Guest, 2015, Health economic burden that wounds impose on the National Health Service in the UK, BMJ Open, 5, e009283, 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009283 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Serjeant, 2005, Leg ulceration in sickle cell disease: medieval medicine in a modern world, Hematol Oncol Clin North Am, 19, 943, 10.1016/j.hoc.2005.08.005 · DOI
  5. Papi, 2016, Vasculitic ulcers, Int J Low Extrem Wounds, 15, 6, 10.1177/1534734615621220 · doi:10.1177/1534734615621220
  6. Burns, 2000, HIV/AIDS: impact on healing, Ostomy Wound Manage, 46, 30
  7. Anderson, 2014, Factors that impair wound healing, J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec, 4, 84, 10.1016/j.jccw.2014.03.001 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Maroz, 2014, Wound healing in patients with impaired kidney function, J Am Coll Clin Wound Spec, 5, 2, 10.1016/j.jccw.2014.05.002 · doi:10.1016/j.jccw.2014.05.002
  9. Padula, 2017, Using clinical data to predict high-cost performance coding issues associated with pressure ulcers: a multilevel cohort model, J Am Med Inform Assoc, 24, e95, 10.1093/jamia/ocw118 · DOI
  10. Horn, 2015, A predictive model for pressure ulcer outcome: the Wound Healing Index, Adv Skin Wound Care, 28, 560, 10.1097/01.ASW.0000473131.10948.e7 · doi:10.1097/01.asw.0000473131.10948.e7
  11. Ward, 2000, A comparison of three approaches for attributing hospitalizations to specific diseases in cost analyses, Int J Technol Assess Health Care, 16, 125, 10.1017/S0266462300161112 · DOI
  12. Harrington, 2000, A cost analysis of diabetic lower-extremity ulcers, Diabetes Care, 23, 1333, 10.2337/diacare.23.9.1333 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Rice, 2014, Burden of venous leg ulcers in the United States, J Med Econ, 17, 347, 10.3111/13696998.2014.903258 · DOI

Cited by

See all 1,218

Metadata

Authors
Nussbaum, S. R., Carter, M. J., Fife, C. E., DaVanzo, J., Haught, R., Nusgart, M., & Cartwright, D.
Venue
Value in Health
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
27-32
ISSN
1098-3015 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2755970326
Cited by
1,218
References
2
FWCI
105.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An Economic Evaluation of the Impact, Cost, and Medicare Policy Implications of Chronic Nonhealing Wounds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.jval.2017.07.007
The paper
Nussbaum, S. R., Carter, M. J., Fife, C. E., DaVanzo, J., Haught, R., Nusgart, M., & Cartwright, D. (2018). An Economic Evaluation of the Impact, Cost, and Medicare Policy Implications of Chronic Nonhealing Wounds. Value in Health. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2017.07.007

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.