Cited by 23Influenza Virus Research StudiesMolecular Biology Techniques and ApplicationsClinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 18 of the 18 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Measuring influenza RNA quantity after prolonged storage or multiple freeze/thaw cycles

Granados, Andrea, Petrich, Astrid, McGeer, Allison, Gubbay, Jonathan B.·2017·Journal of Virological Methods

Abstract

In this study, we aim to determine what effects prolonged storage and repeated freeze/thaw cycles have on the stability of influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 (influenza A/H1N1)RNA. Cloned influenza A/H1N1 RNA transcripts were serially diluted from 8.0-1.0 log 10 copies/μl. RT-qPCR was used to measure RNA loss in transcripts stored at -80°C, -20°C, 4°C and 25°C for up to 84days or transcripts undergoing a total of 10 freeze/thaw cycles. Viral load was measured in clinical specimens stored at-80°C for three years (n=89 influenza A RNA extracts; n=35 primary specimens) and in 10 clinical specimens from the 2015/2016 influenza season that underwent 7 freeze/thaw cycles. RNA stored at -80°C, -20°C, 4°C and 25°C is stable for up to 56, 56, 21, and 7days respectively or up to 9 freeze/thaw cycles when stored at -80°C. There is no difference in viral load in clinical specimens that have been stored for up to three years at -80°C if they are re-extracted. Similarly, clinical specimens undergoing up to 7 freeze/thaw cycles are stable if they are re-extracted between cycles. Influenza specimens can be stored for up to three years at -80°C or undergo up to 7 freeze/thaw cycles without loss of RNA quantity if re-extracted.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jviromet.2017.05.018

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Granados, A., Petrich, A., McGeer, A., & Gubbay, J. B.
Affiliations
University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Granados, Andrea
Venue
Journal of Virological Methods
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-09
Volume
247
Pages
45-50
ISSN
0166-0934 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2618357101
Cited by
23
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
1.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Virological Methods (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Influenza Virus Research Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology Techniques and Applications
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Medical Laboratory Technology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
Keywords
influenza A(H1N1)pdm09, RNA stability, RNA storage, freeze-thaw cycles, RNA degradation, viral load, clinical samples, long-term sample storage, RT-qPCR
MeSH terms
Freezing, Humans, Preservation, Biological, RNA, Viral, Specimen Handling, Viral Load, Reverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain Reaction, Genomic Instability, Influenza A Virus, H1N1 Subtype, Real-Time Polymerase Chain Reaction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review