CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 145Abdominal vascular conditions and treatmentsPeripheral Artery Disease ManagementRenal and Vascular Pathologies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 20 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Endovascular treatment of stenotic and occluded visceral arteries for chronic mesenteric ischemia

Open access
Sarac, Timur P., Altinel, Ozcan, Kashyap, Vikram, Bena, Jams, Lyden, Sean, Sruvastava, Sunita, Eagleton, Matthew, Clair, Daniel·2008·Journal of Vascular Surgery
DOI 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.11.046
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Purpose Percutaneous angioplasty and stenting (PTAS) is emerging as a therapeutic option for patients with chronic mesenteric ischemia. This study evaluated patency and mortality, and their relationship between degree of vessel occlusion (stenotic or totally occluded), stent characteristics, and comorbidities in patients who were treated with PTAS of the visceral vessels for chronic mesenteric ischemia.Methods A retrospective review was performed of the records of all patients who underwent PTAS of the celiac, superior mesenteric, or inferior mesenteric arteries, or both, for symptomatic chronic mesenteric ischemia between January 2001 and December 2005. Patient demographics, lesion characteristics (stenosis or occlusion), interventional details, and early and late mortality rates were recorded. Cumulative mortality and patency rates and factors associated with outcomes were determined using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazards modeling.Results Eighty-seven mesenteric vessels (57 superior mesenteric, 23 celiac, and 7 inferior mesenteric arteries) were treated in 65 patients (29 men and 36 women). Completely occluded vessels were treated in 18 patients (28%), and >60% stenosis was treated in 47 patients (72%). Mesenteric angina was the most common symptom (97%). For the entire series, the cumulative 1-year results were primary patency, 65% (95% confidence interval [CI], 50%-80%); primary assisted patency, 97% (95% CI, 92%-100%); secondary patency, 99% (95% CI, 96%-100%); and survival, 89% (95% CI, 80%-98%). All deaths occurred <or=60 days after treatment. The endovascular treatment of visceral artery occlusion was not associated with diminished patency or survival, irrespective of stent size or number. Patients requiring bowel resection were less likely to survive than those who did not (odds ratio [OR], 26; 95% CI, 3.5-192; P < .001). One-year primary patency was worse among patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR, 3.2; 95% CI, 1.4-7.7; P = .009) or who had femoral access (OR, 3.0; 95% CI, 1.1-7.9; P = .015).Conclusions For patients with chronic mesenteric ischemia, the results of endovascular treatment of occluded mesenteric arteries are indistinguishable from those treated for stenotic vessels. Patients requiring bowel resection are less likely to survive, and those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease or who had femoral access have higher reintervention rates.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jvs.2007.11.046

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 20 references

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Sarac, T. P., Altinel, O., Kashyap, V., Bena, J., Lyden, S., Sruvastava, S., Eagleton, M., & Clair, D.
Affiliations
Cleveland Clinic (US)
Corresponding author
Sarac, Timur P.
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-03
Volume
47
Issue
3
Pages
485-491.e2
ISSN
0741-5214 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.jvs.2007.11.046
OpenAlex
W1987518313
Cited by
145
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 10 · 2012: 18
FWCI
17.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • Journal of Vascular Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Abdominal vascular conditions and treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Nephrology › Renal and Vascular Pathologies
Keywords
chronic mesenteric ischemia, percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting, visceral artery stenosis, visceral artery occlusion, superior mesenteric artery, celiac artery, inferior mesenteric artery, stent patency, mortality, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, bowel resection, endovascular treatment outcomes, comorbidities
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Angioplasty, Balloon, Celiac Artery, Chronic Disease, Constriction, Pathologic, Female, Humans, Ischemia, Male, Mesenteric Vascular Occlusion, Middle Aged, Recurrence, Retrospective Studies, Risk Factors, Severity of Illness Index, Digestive System Surgical Procedures, Time Factors, Vascular Patency, Stents, Proportional Hazards Models, Odds Ratio, Treatment Outcome, Mesenteric Artery, Inferior, Mesenteric Artery, Superior, Risk Assessment, Pulmonary Disease, Chronic Obstructive, Kaplan-Meier Estimate

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review