Cited by 9Peripheral Artery Disease ManagementVascular Procedures and ComplicationsDiabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management

The Nevada peripheral artery disease screening effort in a Medicare Advantage population and subsequent mortality and major adverse cardiovascular event risk

Open access
Smolderen, Kim G., Heath, Kevin, Scherr, Terry, Bauzon, Samuel R., Howell, Amy Nguyen, Mena-Hurtado, Carlos·2022·Journal of Vascular Surgery

Abstract

Background Contemporary estimates of undetected asymptomatic lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) in the community and its association with adverse outcomes in the population are lacking. We investigated the long-term association between previously undetected PAD and subsequent all-cause mortality and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) for Medicare Advantage beneficiaries aged ≥65 years in a large metropolitan area characterized by concentrations of atherosclerotic risk factors and a more vulnerable socioeconomic risk profile. Methods Data were derived from the patients' electronic medical records and linked with claims outcomes data for 13,971 Medicare Advantage beneficiaries aged ≥65 years who had undergone PAD screening in 2016 as a part of their routine annual health assessment in the greater Las Vegas, Nevada, metropolitan area. PAD screening was performed with their primary care provider using volume plethysmography system methods. The association between PAD screening status and 1- and 3-year all-cause mortality and MACE rates was documented. Results The cohort had a mean age of 75.3 ± 6.6 years, and 57.7% were women. Of the 13,768 patients, 4351 (31.6%) had had a positive PAD screening result. Almost 60% had had a lower socioeconomic income level, with 15.1% living under the poverty level. The risk estimates associated with a positive vs negative PAD screening result for both all-cause mortality and MACE were as follows: unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) for mortality, 2.17 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.79-2.63) and unadjusted HR for MACE, 2.00 (95% CI, 1.15-3.49) at 1 year and unadjusted HR for mortality, 2.04 (95% CI, 1.84-2.26) and unadjusted HR for MACE, 1.67 (95% CI, 1.37-2.02) at 3 years. After multivariable adjustment, all associations persisted (P < .001), with HRs ranging from 1.41 to 1.69, except for that for 1-year MACE (similar risk estimate but P = .09). Conclusions A positive screening result for previously undetected lower extremity PAD was independently associated with short- and long-term increased risks of mortality and MACE for individuals aged ≥65 years living in a large, metropolitan area.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jvs.2022.01.134

Cites

28 of 28 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A positive screening test for PAD in an asymptomatic population has been associated with increased cardiovascular event rates.

    “While a positive screening test for PAD in an asymptomatic population has been associated with increased cardiovascular event rates (241,242), prospective, randomized studies addressing whether screening for PAD in people with diabetes improves longterm limb outcomes and cardiovascular event rates are limited.”
  • A positive screening test for PAD in an asymptomatic population has been associated with increased cardiovascular event rates.

    “While a positive screening test for PAD in an asymptomatic population has been associated with increased cardiovascular event rates (230,231), prospective, randomized studies addressing whether screening for PAD in”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 29 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Smolderen, K. G., Heath, K., Scherr, T., Bauzon, S. R., Howell, A. N., & Mena-Hurtado, C.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • Optum (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Smolderen, Kim G.
Venue
Journal of Vascular Surgery
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-06
Volume
75
Issue
6
Pages
2054-2064.e3
ISSN
0741-5214 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4213062014
Cited by
9
References
29
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.92
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Vascular Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Abbott Laboratories
  • Johnson and Johnson
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Peripheral Artery Disease Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine › Vascular Procedures and Complications
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management
Keywords
peripheral arterial disease, PAD screening, all-cause mortality, major adverse cardiovascular events, Medicare Advantage beneficiaries, older adults, socioeconomic deprivation, Las Vegas, cardiovascular risk stratification, mortality risk prediction model
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Female, Humans, Male, Nevada, Risk Factors, United States, Medicare Part C, Lower Extremity, Peripheral Arterial Disease

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review