Cited by 73Global trade, sustainability, and social impactGlobal trade and economicsGlobal Urban Networks and Dynamics

The evolving geography of production hubs and regional value chains across East Asia: Trade in value-added

Open access
Suder, Gabriele, Liesch, Peter W., Inomata, Satoshi, Mihailova, Irina, Meng, Bo·2015·Journal of World Business

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jwb.2014.05.003

Cites

118 of 118 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Suppliers with more advanced technologies become core players in their regional networks.

    “Internal R&D becomes a dominant strategy for upgrading (Kumaraswamy et al., 2012), and suppliers with more advanced technologies become core players in their regional networks (Suder et al., 2015).”

    From Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature (2020) · cites this paper as Suder et al., 2015

  • Only two studies (Azmeh & Nadvi, 2014; Suder et al., 2015) directly address the regional effect in GVCs.

    “In fact, only two studies (Azmeh & Nadvi, 2014;Suder et al., 2015) directly address the regional effect in GVCs, although a larger number of empirical studies published in economic geography journals (Table 3) focus on GVC impacts on location-specific upgrading and regional development.”

    From Global value chains: A review of the multi-disciplinary literature (2020) · cites this paper as Suder et al., 2015

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 38

  1. Acharya, A. (2001). Constructing a Security Community in Southeast Asia. London: Routledge.
  2. Amine, L.S. & Chao, M.C.H. (2005). Managing country image to long-term advantage: The case of Taiwan and Acer. Place Branding, 1(2): 187-204.
  3. Buckley, P.J. & Ghauri, P.N. (2004). Globalisation, economic geography and the strategy of MNEs. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2): 81-98.
  4. Chen, H. & Chen, T.-J. (1998). Network linkages and location choice in foreign direct investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 29(3): 445-467.
  5. Colantone, I. & Sleuwaegen, L. (2010). International trade, exit and entry: A cross-country and industry analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(7): 1240-1257.
  6. Doo-Yun, H. (2001). Korea's international trade policy in the global age. East Asian Review, 13(3): 3-20.
  7. Dunning, J.H. (1980). Toward an eclectic theory of international production. Journal of International Business Studies, 11: 9-31.
  8. Filatotchev, I., Strange,R., Piesse, J. & Lien, Y.-C. (2007). FDI by firms from newly industrialised economies in emerging markets: Corporate governance, entry mode and location. Journal of International Business Studies, 38: 556-572.
  9. Flynn, B., Schroeder, R. & Sakakibara, S. (1995). The impact of quality management practices on performance and competitive advantage. Decision Sciences, Online Version 2005, 26(5): 659-691.
  10. Fratianni, M., Marchionne, F. & Oh, C.H. (2011). Commentary on the gravity equation in international business. Multinational Business Review, 19: 36-46.
  11. Go, D. (2002). External shocks, adjustment policies and investment in a developing economy: Illustrations from a forward-looking CGE model of the Philippines. Journal of Development Economics, 44(2): 229-261.
  12. Hamel, G. & Prahalad, C.K. (1985). Do you really have a global strategy? Harvard Business Review, 63(4): 139-148.
  13. Harvie, C. & Lee, H.-H. (2002). Korea's Economic miracle fading or reviving? Economics & Finance Collection, London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  14. He, C. (2003). Location of foreign manufacturers in China: Agglomeration economies and country of origin effects. Papers in Regional Science, 82(3): 351-372.
  15. Herrina, A. & Perniaa, E. (1987). Factors influencing the choice of location: Local and foreign firms in the Philippines. Regional Studies, 21(6): 531-541.
  16. Hymer, S.H. (1960/1976). The international operations of national firms: A study of direct foreign investment. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
  17. Jacobides, M.G. & Winter, S.G. (2005). The co-evolution of capabilities and transaction costs: Explaining the institutional structure of production. Strategic Management Journal, 26: 395-413.
  18. Jormanainen, I. & Koveshnikov, A. (2010). Theoretical and empirical research on emerging market multinationals: Current state and future directions. 36th European International Business Academy Conference, Porto, Portugal.
  19. Kajiwara, H. (1994). The effects of trade and foreign investment liberalization policy on productivity in The Philippines. The Developing Economies, 32(4): 492-508.
  20. Lauridsen, L. (2004). Foreign direct investment, linkage formation and supplier development in Thailand during the 1990s: The role of state governance. European Journal of Development Research, 16 (September): 561-586.
  21. Li, Sh. (2004). Location and performance of foreign firms in China. Management International Review, 44(2): 151-169.
  22. Lin, J.Y., Cai, F. & Zhou, L. (2003). The China miracle: Development strategy and economic reform, Revised Edition, The Chinese University of Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.
  23. Liu, M.-C. & Chen, S.-H. (2005). International R&D deployment and locational advantage-A Case Study of Taiwan. In : Takatoshi, I. & Rose, A.K., International Trade in East Asia ( pp. 81-108). NBER- East Asia Seminar on Economics, Volume 14, National Bureau of Economic Research, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  24. Liu, X., Song, H., Wei, Y. & Romilly, P. (1997). Country characteristics and foreign direct investment in China: A panel data analysis. Review of World Economics, 133(2): 313-329.
  25. Luo, Y. (2011). Keynote Speech: China Goes Global. 5 th China Goes Global conference, October 2-4, 2011, Harvard Kennedy School, Cambridge, MA.
  26. Majocchi, A. & Zucchella, A. (2003). Internationalisation and performance: Findings from a set of Italian SMEs. International Small Business Journal, 21(3): 249-266.
  27. Mody, A. (1990). Institutions and dynamic comparative advantage: The electronics industry in South Korea and Taiwan. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 14(3): 291-314.
  28. Moona, H.C., Rugman, A. & Verbeke, A. (1998). A generalized double diamond approach to the global competitiveness of Korea and Singapore. International Business Review, 7(2): 135-150.
  29. Cheng, L. & Kierzkowski , H. (Eds.) Global Production and Trade in East Asia'(pp. 63-109). Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
  30. Persons, O. (2006). Corporate governance in Thailand: What has been done since the 1997 financial crisis? International Journal of Disclosure and Governance, 3: 288-305.
  31. Ravenhill, J. (2001). APEC and the construction of Pacific rim regionalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  32. Reinhardt, N. (2000). Back to basics in Malaysia and Thailand: The role of resource-based exports in their export-led growth. World Development, 28(1): 57-77.
  33. Riviera, M. & Suder, G. (2013) Dynamic capabilities for successful strategic renewal: internationalization and sourcing capabilities, EURAM Conference Proceedings, EURAM 2013 Annual Conference, Istanbul.
  34. Seyoum, B. (2007). Revealed comparative advantage and competitiveness in services: A study with special emphasis on developing countries. Journal of Economic Studies, 34(5): 376-388.
  35. UNCTAD (2007). Trade and Development Report, UNCTAD/TDR/2007, Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
  36. UNCTAD/ Investment Report (2009). Transnational Corporation, agricultural production and development, Investment Report 2009, Geneva: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.
  37. Widodo, T. (2009). Dynamics and convergence of trade specialization in East Asia. Asia Pacific Journal of Economics & Business, 13(1): 31-75.
  38. Zhang, K.H. (2005). Why does so much FDI from Hong Kong and Taiwan go to Mainland China? China Economic Review, 16(3): 293-307.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Suder, G., Liesch, P. W., Inomata, S., Mihailova, I., & Meng, B.
Affiliations
  • The University of Melbourne (AU)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
  • Japan External Trade Organization (JP)
  • Aalto University (FI)
Corresponding author
Suder, Gabriele
Venue
Journal of World Business
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-07
Volume
50
Issue
3
Pages
404-416
ISSN
1090-9516 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2155201456
Cited by
70
References
118
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2013: 1
FWCI
13.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Journal of World Business (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Funders
European Union/EACEA
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Global trade and economics
  • Social Sciences › Urban Studies › Global Urban Networks and Dynamics
Keywords
value-added trade, regional value chains, production networks, East Asia, disintermediation, location-specific advantages, international production, regional integration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review