CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 58

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Integrating microalgae into textile wastewater treatment processes: Advancements and opportunities

Mishra, Vandana, Mudgal, Nikhil, Rawat, Deepak, Poria, Pankaj, Mukherjee, Paromita, Sharma, Udita, Kumria, Poonam, Pani, Balaram, Singh, Mrinalini, Yadav, Archana, Farooqi, Furqan, Sharma, Radhey Shyam·2023·Journal of Water Process Engineering
DOI 10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104128
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104128

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 80

  1. Yaseen, 2019, Textile dye wastewater characteristics and constituents of synthetic effluents: a critical review, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol., 16, 1193, 10.1007/s13762-018-2130-z · DOI · Paper page
  2. Khan, 2018, Toxicity evaluation of textile effluents and role of native soil bacterium in biodegradation of a textile dye, Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. Int., 25, 4446, 10.1007/s11356-017-0783-7 · DOI
  3. Rovira, 2019, Human health risks due to exposure to inorganic and organic chemicals from textiles: a review, Environ. Res., 168, 62, 10.1016/j.envres.2018.09.027 · DOI
  4. Rawat, 2018, Ecotoxic potential of a presumably non-toxic azo dye, Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf., 148, 528, 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2017.10.049 · DOI
  5. Fazal, 2018, Bioremediation of textile wastewater and successive biodiesel production using microalgae, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 82, 3107, 10.1016/j.rser.2017.10.029 · DOI
  6. Garg, 2020, Prosopis juliflora peroxidases for phenol remediation from industrial wastewater—an innovative practice for environmental sustainability, Environ. Technol. Innov., 19, 10.1016/j.eti.2020.100865 · DOI
  7. Kaur, 2022, Ecotoxic effects of microplastics and contaminated microplastics–emerging evidence and perspective, Sci. Total Environ., 841, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.156593 · DOI
  8. Mishra, 2020, Fast-changing life-styles and ecotoxicity of hair dyes drive the emergence of hidden toxicants threatening environmental sustainability in Asia, Environ. Res., 184, 10.1016/j.envres.2020.109253 · DOI
  9. Priyadarshani, 2012, Rath, microalgal bioremediation: current practices and perspectives, J. Biochem. Technol., 3, 299
  10. Madhav, 2018, A review of textile industry: wet processing, environmental impacts, and effluent treatment methods, Environ. Qual. Manag., 27, 31, 10.1002/tqem.21538 · DOI
  11. Rawat, 2016, Detoxification of azo dyes in the context of environmental processes, Chemosphere, 155, 591, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.04.068 · DOI
  12. Amaro, 2023, Microalgae systems - environmental agents for wastewater treatment and further potential biomass valorisation, J. Environ. Manag., 337, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.117678 · DOI
  13. Hashmi, 2023, Recent Progress in microalgae-based Technologies for Industrial Wastewater Treatment, Fermentation, 9, 10.3390/fermentation9030311 · DOI
  14. Sutherland, 2019, Microalgal bioremediation of emerging contaminants - opportunities and challenges, Water Res., 164, 10.1016/j.watres.2019.114921 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Castillo-Suárez, 2023, A critical review of textile industry wastewater: green technologies for the removal of indigo dyes, Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. (Tehran), 10.1007/s13762-023-04810-2 · DOI
  16. Usha, 2016, Removal of nutrients and organic pollution load from pulp and paper mill effluent by microalgae in outdoor open pond, Bioresour. Technol., 214, 856, 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.04.060 · DOI
  17. G. Kumar, M. Huy, P. Bakonyi, K. Bélafi-Bakó, S.-H. Kim, Evaluation of gradual adaptation of mixed microalgae consortia cultivation using textile wastewater via fed batch operation, Biotechnol. reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) 20 (2018) e00289, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.btre.2018.e00289. · DOI
  18. Rai, 2022, Sustainable treatment of dye wastewater by recycling microalgal and diatom biogenic materials: biorefinery perspectives, Chemosphere, 305, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.135371 · DOI
  19. de Andrade, 2018, Microalgae for bioremediation of textile wastewater: an overview, MOJ food process, Technol., 6
  20. Premaratne, 2021, Bioremediation of textile dye wastewater using microalgae: current trends and future perspectives, J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol., 96
  21. Robinson, 2001, Remediation of dyes in textile effluent: a critical review on current treatment technologies with a proposed alternative, Bioresour. Technol., 77, 247, 10.1016/S0960-8524(00)00080-8 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Moghazy Reda, 2018, The efficacy of microalgal biomass collected from high rate algal pond for dyes biosorption and biofuel production, Res. J. Chem. Environ., 22, 54
  23. Rawat, 2016, Detoxification of azo dyes in the context of environmental processes, Chemosphere, 155, 591, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.04.068 · DOI
  24. Rawat, 2023, A bottom-up approach to select microbes from textile wastewater for detoxification of aromatic amine and azo dye in a single stage, J. Water Process Eng., 53, 10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.103668 · DOI
  25. Rawat, 2022, Algal-bacterial mutualism: a sustainable approach for the bioremediation of textile wastewater, Phycol., 103, 9
  26. Chin, 2020, Removal of synthetic dye by Chlorella vulgaris microalgae as natural adsorbent, Arab. J. Sci. Eng., 45, 7385, 10.1007/s13369-020-04557-9 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Magdalena, 2019, Microalgae biomass as a potential feedstock for the carboxylate platform, Molecules, 24, 10.3390/molecules24234404 · DOI
  28. Gross, 2014, Yearlong evaluation of performance and durability of a pilot-scale revolving algal biofilm (RAB) cultivation system, Bioresour. Technol., 171, 50, 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.08.052 · DOI · Paper page
  29. Patel, 2020, Emerging prospects of mixotrophic microalgae: way forward to sustainable bioprocess for environmental remediation and cost-effective biofuels, Bioresour. Technol., 300, 10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122741 · DOI
  30. Fallahi, 2021, Interactions of microalgae-bacteria consortia for nutrient removal from wastewater: a review, Chemosphere, 272, 129878, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.129878 · DOI
  31. Li, 2022, Recent advances of algae-bacteria consortia in aquatic remediation, Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol., 53, 1
  32. Sun, 2022, Analysis on the flocculation characteristics of algal organic matters, J. Environ. Manag., 302, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.114094 · DOI
  33. Wang, 2016, Perspectives on the feasibility of using microalgae for industrial wastewater treatment, Bioresour. Technol., 222, 485, 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.09.106 · DOI
  34. Rawat, 2022, Iron-dependent mutualism between Chlorella sorokiniana and Ralstonia pickettii forms the basis for a sustainable bioremediation system, ISME Commun., 2, 83, 10.1038/s43705-022-00161-0 · DOI
  35. Xiao, 2016, Overview of microalgal extracellular polymeric substances (EPS) and their applications, Biotechnol. Adv., 34, 1225, 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2016.08.004 · DOI · Paper page
  36. Bilal, 2018, Biosorption: an interplay between marine algae and potentially toxic elements-a review, Mar. Drugs, 16, 2, 10.3390/md16020065 · DOI
  37. Kuanar, 2022, A comparative review on bioremediation of chromium by bacterial, fungal, algal and microbial consortia, Geomicrobiol J., 39, 515, 10.1080/01490451.2022.2035019 · DOI
  38. R.V. Khandare, S.P. Govindwar, Phytoremediation of textile dyes and effluents: current scenario and future prospects, Biotechnol. Adv. 33 (Dec. 2015) 1697–1714, doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2015.09.003. · DOI
  39. Touliabah, 2022, A review of microalgae- and cyanobacteria-based biodegradation of organic pollutants, Molecules, 27, 3, 10.3390/molecules27031141 · DOI
  40. Dubey, 2022, Advancement in algal bioremediation for organic, inorganic, and emerging pollutants, Environ. Pollut., 120840
  41. Luo, 2014, Removal and transformation of high molecular weight polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in water by live and dead microalgae, Process Biochem., 49, 1723, 10.1016/j.procbio.2014.06.026 · DOI
  42. Wang, 2010, Cultivation of green algae Chlorella sp. in different wastewaters from municipal wastewater treatment plant, Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol., 162, 1174, 10.1007/s12010-009-8866-7 · DOI
  43. Liyanaarachchi, 2021, Two-stage cultivation of microalgae for production of high-value compounds and biofuels: a review, Algal Res., 57, 10.1016/j.algal.2021.102353 · DOI
  44. Megawati, 2022, Comparative study on the various hydrolysis and fermentation mMethods of Chlorella vulgaris biomass for the production of bioethanol, Int. J. Renew. Energy Dev., 11, 515, 10.14710/ijred.2022.41696 · DOI
  45. Slocombe, 2020, Fixing the broken phosphorus cycle: wastewater remediation by microalgal polyphosphates, front, Plant Sci., 11, 1
  46. Guo, 2013, Characterization of flocculating agent from the self-flocculating microalga Scenedesmus obliquus AS-6-1 for efficient biomass harvest, Bioresour. Technol., 145, 285, 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.120 · DOI
  47. Onen Cinar, 2020, Bioplastic production from microalgae: a review, Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, 17, 11, 10.3390/ijerph17113842 · DOI
  48. Van Den Hende, 2014, Up-scaling aquaculture wastewater treatment by microalgal bacterial flocs: from lab reactors to an outdoor raceway pond, Bioresour. Technol., 159, 342, 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.02.113 · DOI
  49. Nair, 2023, Phycoremediation of synthetic dyes laden textile wastewater and recovery of bio-based pigments from residual biomass: an approach towards sustainable wastewater management, Processes, 11, 6, 10.3390/pr11061793 · DOI
  50. Vulsteke, 2017, Economic feasibility of microalgal bacterial floc production for wastewater treatment and biomass valorization: a detailed up-to-date analysis of up-scaled pilot results, Bioresour. Technol., 224, 118, 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.11.090 · DOI
  51. Marazzi, 2023, Wastewater from textile digital printing as a substrate for microalgal growth and valorization, Bioresour. Technol., 375, 10.1016/j.biortech.2023.128828 · DOI
  52. Garrido-Baserba, 2018, The economics of wastewater treatment decentralization: a techno-economic evaluation, Environ. Sci. Technol., 52, 8965, 10.1021/acs.est.8b01623 · DOI
  53. Assunção, 2020, Enclosed ‘non-conventional’ photobioreactors for microalga production: a review, Algal Res., 52, 10.1016/j.algal.2020.102107 · DOI
  54. Brennan, 2010, Biofuels from microalgae—a review of technologies for production, processing, and extractions of biofuels and co-products, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 14, 557, 10.1016/j.rser.2009.10.009 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Moreno-Garrido, 2008, Microalgae immobilization: current techniques and uses, Bioresour. Technol., 99, 3949, 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.05.040 · DOI
  56. Xu, 2017, Attached microalgae cultivation and nutrients removal in a novel capillary-driven photo-biofilm reactor, Algal Res., 27, 198, 10.1016/j.algal.2017.08.028 · DOI
  57. Shi, 2014, Application of a prototype-scale twin-layer photobioreactor for effective N and P removal from different process stages of municipal wastewater by immobilized microalgae, Bioresour. Technol., 154, 260, 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.11.100 · DOI
  58. González, 2020, Wastewater nutrient recovery using twin-layer microalgae technology for biofertilizer production, Water Sci. Technol., 82, 1044, 10.2166/wst.2020.372 · DOI
  59. Yadav, 2022, Microbial fuel cells for mineralization and decolorization of azo dyes: recent advances in design and materials, Sci. Total Environ., 826, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154038 · DOI
  60. Wang, 2018, Novel bufferless photosynthetic microbial fuel cell (PMFCs) for enhanced electrochemical performance, Bioresour. Technol., 255, 83, 10.1016/j.biortech.2018.01.086 · DOI
  61. Sun, 2015, Sequential decolorization of azo dye and mineralization of decolorization liquid coupled with bioelectricity generation using a pH self-neutralized photobioelectrochemical system operated with polarity reversion, J. Hazard. Mater., 289, 108, 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2015.02.010 · DOI
  62. Marella, 2019, Biodiesel production through algal cultivation in urban wastewater using algal floway, Bioresour. Technol., 280, 222, 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.02.031 · DOI
  63. Fasaei, 2018, Techno-economic evaluation of microalgae harvesting and dewatering systems, Algal Res., 31, 347, 10.1016/j.algal.2017.11.038 · DOI · Paper page
  64. Li, 2020, A review on flocculation as an efficient method to harvest energy microalgae: mechanisms, performances, influencing factors and perspectives, Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev., 131, 10.1016/j.rser.2020.110005 · DOI
  65. Postma, 2016, Selective extraction of intracellular components from the microalga Chlorella vulgaris by combined pulsed electric field–temperature treatment, Bioresour. Technol., 203, 80, 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.12.012 · DOI
  66. Wang, 2015, Harvesting microalgae by magnetic separation: a review, Algal Res., 9, 178, 10.1016/j.algal.2015.03.005 · DOI
  67. Cheng, 2011, The impact of cell wall carbohydrate composition on the chitosan flocculation of Chlorella, Process Biochem., 46, 1927, 10.1016/j.procbio.2011.06.021 · DOI
  68. Pohl, 1978, Dielectrophoretic force: a comparison of theory and experiment, J. Biol. Phys., 6, 133, 10.1007/BF02328936 · DOI
  69. Karacaoğlu, 2023, Microfluidic systems as a novel approach for microalgal bioprocess, Biochem. Eng. J., 197, 108959, 10.1016/j.bej.2023.108959 · DOI
  70. Matter, 2019, Flocculation harvesting techniques for microalgae: a review, Appl. Sci., 9, 3069, 10.3390/app9153069 · DOI
  71. Ummalyma, 2016, Harvesting of microalgal biomass: efficient method for flocculation through pH modulation, Bioresour. Technol., 213, 216, 10.1016/j.biortech.2016.03.114 · DOI
  72. Ummalyma, 2017, Bioflocculation: an alternative strategy for harvesting of microalgae – an overview, Bioresour. Technol., 242, 227, 10.1016/j.biortech.2017.02.097 · DOI
  73. Jahan, 2022, A comprehensive review on the sustainable treatment of textile wastewater: zero liquid discharge and resource recovery perspectives, Sustainability, 14, 15398, 10.3390/su142215398 · DOI · Paper page
  74. Salim, 2011, Harvesting of microalgae by bio-flocculation, J. Appl. Phycol., 23, 849, 10.1007/s10811-010-9591-x · DOI
  75. Wijffels, 2013, Potential of industrial biotechnology with cyanobacteria and eukaryotic microalgae, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol., 24, 405, 10.1016/j.copbio.2013.04.004 · DOI
  76. Zhou, 2023, Coagulation/flocculation-flotation harvest of Microcystis aeruginosa by cationic hydroxyethyl cellulose and Agrobacterium mucopolysaccharides, Chemosphere, 313, 137503, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.137503 · DOI
  77. Chen, 2021, Semi-batch cultivation of Chlorella sorokiniana AK-1 with dual carriers for the effective treatment of full strength piggery wastewater treatment, Bioresour. Technol., 326, 124773, 10.1016/j.biortech.2021.124773 · DOI
  78. Lira, 2020, Metagenomic analysis of an urban resistome before and after wastewater treatment, Sci. Rep., 10
  79. Barati, 2021, Recent progress in genetically modified microalgae for enhanced carbon dioxide sequestration, Bio. Bioener., 145, 105927, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2020.105927 · DOI
  80. Fan, 2020, Performance of Chlorella sorokiniana-activated sludge consortium treating wastewater under light-limited heterotrophic condition, Chem. Eng. J., 382, 122799, 10.1016/j.cej.2019.122799 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Mishra, V., Mudgal, N., Rawat, D., Poria, P., Mukherjee, P., Sharma, U., Kumria, P., Pani, B., Singh, M., Yadav, A., Farooqi, F., & Sharma, R. S.
Venue
Journal of Water Process Engineering
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2023-10
Volume
55
Pages
104128
ISSN
2214-7144
DOI
10.1016/j.jwpe.2023.104128
Cited by
58
References
6
Language
en
Licence
Funders
  • British Phycological Society
  • Maritime Administration
  • Maine Department of Transportation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review