CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 189

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Making graph theory operational for landscape ecological assessments, planning, and design

Zetterberg, Andreas, Mörtberg, Ulla M., Balfors, Berit·2010·Landscape and Urban Planning
DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.01.002
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.01.002

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 32

  1. Adriaensen, 2003, The application of ‘least-cost’ modelling as a functional landscape model, Landscape Urban Plan., 64, 233, 10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00242-6 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Bodin, 2007, A network approach for analyzing spatially structured populations in fragmented landscape, Landscape Ecol., 22, 31, 10.1007/s10980-006-9015-0 · DOI
  3. Bunn, 2000, Landscape connectivity: a conservation application of graph theory, J. Environ. Manage., 59, 265, 10.1006/jema.2000.0373 · DOI
  4. Calabrese, 2004, A comparison-shopper's guide to connectivity metrics, Front. Ecol. Environ., 2, 529, 10.1890/1540-9295(2004)002[0529:ACGTCM]2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Estrada, 2008, Using network centrality measures to manage landscape connectivity, Ecol. Appl., 18, 1810, 10.1890/07-1419.1 · DOI
  6. Fall, 2007, Spatial graphs: principles and applications for habitat connectivity, Ecosystems, 10, 448, 10.1007/s10021-007-9038-7 · DOI
  7. Hemelaar, 1983, Age of Bufo bufo in Amplexus over the spawning period, Oikos, 40, 1, 10.2307/3544193 · DOI
  8. Janssen, 2006, Toward a network perspective of the study of resilience in social–ecological systems, Ecol. Soc., 11, Artn 15, 10.5751/ES-01462-110115 · DOI
  9. Jenelius, 2006, Importance and exposure in road network vulnerability analysis, Transportation Res. Part A: Policy Pract., 40, 537, 10.1016/j.tra.2005.11.003 · DOI
  10. Joly, 2003, Habitat fragmentation and amphibian conservation: building a tool for assessing landscape matrix connectivity, C. R. Biol., 326, S132, 10.1016/S1631-0691(03)00050-7 · DOI
  11. Keitt, 1997, Detecting critical scales in fragmented landscapes, Conserv. Ecol., 1
  12. Löfvenhaft, 2002, Biotope patterns in urban areas: a conceptual model integrating biodiversity issues in spatial planning, Landscape Urban Plan., 58, 223, 10.1016/S0169-2046(01)00223-7 · DOI
  13. Löfvenhaft, 2004, Biotope patterns and amphibian distribution as assessment tools in urban landscape planning, Landscape Urban Plan., 68, 403, 10.1016/S0169-2046(03)00154-3 · DOI
  14. Minor, 2007, Graph theory as a proxy for spatially explicit population models in conservation planning, Ecol. Appl., 17, 1771, 10.1890/06-1073.1 · DOI
  15. O’Brien, 2006, Testing the importance of spatial configuration of winter habitat for woodland caribou: an application of graph theory, Biol. Conserv., 130, 70, 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.12.014 · DOI
  16. Opdam, 2006, Ecological networks: a spatial concept for multi-actor planning of sustainable landscapes, Landscape Urban Plan., 75, 322, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.02.015 · DOI
  17. Pascual-Hortal, 2006, Comparison and development of new graph-based landscape connectivity indices: towards the priorization of habitat patches and corridors for conservation, Landscape Ecol., 21, 959, 10.1007/s10980-006-0013-z · DOI · Paper page
  18. Pinto, 2009, Beyond the least-cost path: evaluating corridor redundancy using a graph-theoretic approach, Landscape Ecol., 24, 253, 10.1007/s10980-008-9303-y · DOI · Paper page
  19. Rae, 2007, Implications of error and uncertainty for an environmental planning scenario: a sensitivity analysis of GIS-based variables in a reserve design exercise, Landscape Urban Plan., 79, 210, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2006.01.001 · DOI
  20. Ray, 2002, Modeling spatial distribution of amphibian populations: a GIS approach based on habitat matrix permeability, Biodivers. Conserv., 11, 2143, 10.1023/A:1021390527698 · DOI
  21. Rothley, 2005, Working backwards to move forwards: graph-based connectivity metrics for reserve network selection, Environ. Model. Assess., 10, 107, 10.1007/s10666-005-4697-2 · DOI
  22. Saura, 2007, A new habitat availability index to integrate connectivity in landscape conservation planning: comparison with existing indices and application to a case study, Landscape Urban Plan., 83, 91, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.03.005 · DOI
  23. Sjögren-Gulve, 1998, Spatial movement patterns in frogs: target-oriented dispersal in the pool frog, Rana lessonae, Ecoscience, 5, 31, 10.1080/11956860.1998.11682436 · DOI
  24. Theobald, 2000, Incorporating biological information in local land-use decision making: designing a system for conservation planning, Landscape Ecol., 15, 35, 10.1023/A:1008165311026 · DOI
  25. Urban, 2001, Landscape connectivity: a graph-theoretic perspective, Ecology, 82, 1205, 10.1890/0012-9658(2001)082[1205:LCAGTP]2.0.CO;2 · DOI
  26. Urban, 2009, Graph models of habitat mosaics, Ecol. Lett., 12, 260, 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01271.x · DOI · Paper page
  27. Uy, 2007, Analyzing urban green space pattern and eco-network in Hanoi, Vietnam, Landscape Ecol. Eng., 3, 143, 10.1007/s11355-007-0030-3 · DOI
  28. Walston, 2008, Variation in amount of surrounding forest habitat influences the initial orientation of juvenile amphibians emigrating from breeding ponds, Can. J. Zool., 86, 141, 10.1139/Z07-117 · DOI
  29. van Langevelde, 2000, Scale of habitat connectivity and colonization in fragmented nuthatch populations, Ecography, 23, 614, 10.1034/j.1600-0587.2000.230512.x · DOI
  30. Vitousek, 1997, Human domination of Earth's ecosystems, Science, 277, 494, 10.1126/science.277.5325.494 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Zetterberg, A., 2009. Network based tools and indicators for landscape ecological assessments, planning, and design. Licentiate Thesis. Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.
  32. Zhang, 2006, Planning an ecological network of Xiamen Island (China) using landscape metrics and network analysis, Landscape Urban Plan., 78, 449, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.12.004 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Zetterberg, A., Mörtberg, U. M., & Balfors, B.
Venue
Landscape and Urban Planning
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2010-04
Volume
95
Issue
4
Pages
181-191
ISSN
0169-2046
DOI
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2010.01.002
Cited by
189
References
2
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review