CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 37Land Use and Ecosystem ServicesUrban and spatial planningSocioeconomics of Resources and Conservation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 79 of the 79 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Linking ecology and aesthetics in sustainable agricultural landscapes: Lessons from the Palouse region of Washington, U.S.A

Klein, Linda R., Hendrix, William G., Lohr, Virginia I., Kaytes, Jolie B., Sayler, Rodney D., Swanson, Mark E., Elliot, William J., Reganold, John P.·2015·Landscape and Urban Planning
DOI 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.019
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.019

Cites

79 of 79 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Among the body of literature on perception of landscape changes, few studies include the concept of ES explicitly.

    “Among the body of literature available regarding the perception of landscape changes [30-32], few studies include the concept of ES explicitly [33].”

    From How Are Landscapes under Agroecological Transition Perceived and Appreciated? A Belgian Case Study (2020) · cites this paper as [32]

  • The approach follows a wide body of studies that successfully assessed people's judgments using manipulated photos as a surrogate for the actual landscape.

    “This approach follows a wide body of studies that successfully assessed people's judgments using manipulated photos as a surrogate for the actual landscape [22,31-33,46].”

    From How Are Landscapes under Agroecological Transition Perceived and Appreciated? A Belgian Case Study (2020) · cites this paper as [32]

  • There is a growing body of scientific work on ES perceptions and values, but it seems disconnected from the field of locals' perceptions of agricultural landscape changes.

    “While there is a growing body of scientific work being carried out on ES perceptions and values, this seems disconnected from the field of locals' perceptions of agricultural landscape changes.”

    From How Are Landscapes under Agroecological Transition Perceived and Appreciated? A Belgian Case Study (2020) · cites this paper as [32]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Arler, 2000, Aspects of landscape or nature quality, Landscape Ecology, 15, 291, 10.1023/A:1008192301500 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Klein, L. R., Hendrix, W. G., Lohr, V. I., Kaytes, J. B., Sayler, R. D., Swanson, M. E., Elliot, W. J., & Reganold, J. P.
Affiliations
  • Washington State University (US)
  • US Forest Service (US)
Corresponding author
Klein, Linda R.
ORCID
Venue
Landscape and Urban Planning
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2015-02
Volume
134
Pages
195-209
ISSN
0169-2046 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.landurbplan.2014.10.019
OpenAlex
W2007193949
Cited by
37
References
79
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 1
FWCI
2.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Landscape and Urban Planning (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Washington State University
  • Washington State Department of Natural Resources
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Land Use and Ecosystem Services
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Urban and spatial planning
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Socioeconomics of Resources and Conservation
Keywords
conservation buffers, agricultural landscapes, landscape aesthetics, scenic quality, soil erosion, sustainable agriculture, Palouse region, watershed management, landscape preference, multifunctional landscapes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review