The DOI matches its Crossref record; 8 of the 8 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Dynamics of antibody response to BNT162b2 vaccine after six months: a longitudinal prospective study
Open accessAbstract
Abstract Background Although the SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines have proven high efficacy, limited data exists on the duration of immune responses and their relation to age and side effects. Methods We studied the antibody and memory T cell responses to Spike protein after the two-dose Comirnaty mRNA vaccine in 122 volunteers up to 3 months and correlated the findings with age and side effects. Findings We found a robust antibody response after the second vaccination dose. However, the antibody levels declined at 6 and 12 weeks postvaccination, indicating a waning of the immune response. Regardless, the average levels remained higher compared to pre-vaccination or in COVID-19 convalescent individuals. The antibodies efficiently blocked ACE2 receptor binding to Spike protein of four variants of concern at one week but this was decreased at three months, in particular with B.1.351 and P1 isolates. 87% of individuals developed Spike-specific memory T cell responses, which were lower in individuals with increased proportions of immunosenescent CD8+ TEMRA cells. We found a decreased vaccination efficacy but fewer adverse events in older individuals, suggesting a detrimental impact of age on outcome. Interpretation The mRNA vaccine induces a strong antibody response to four variants at 1 week postvaccination but decreases thereafter, in particular among older individuals. T cell responses, although detectable in the majority, were lower in individuals with immunosenescence. The deterioration of vaccine response needs to be monitored to define the optimal time for the revaccination. Funding The Estonian Research Council, Icosagen Cell Factory, and SYNLAB Estonia. Research in context Evidence before this study The first studies addressing the immune responses in older individuals after the administration of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines have been published. We searched PubMed and medRxiv for publications on the immune response of SARS-CoV-2-mRNA vaccines, published in English, using the search terms “SARS-CoV-2”, “COVID-19”, “vaccine response”, “mRNA vaccine”, up to May 20th, 2021. To date, most mRNA vaccine response studies have not been peer-reviewed, and data on the dynamics of antibody response, role of age and side effects on SARS-CoV-2-mRNA vaccines in real vaccination situations is limited. Some studies have found a weaker immune response in older individuals after the first dose and these have been measured at a relatively short period (within one to two weeks) after the first dose but little longer-term evidence exists on the postvaccination antibody persistence. Added value of this study In this study, we assessed the antibody response up to three months after the full vaccination with Pfizer-BioNTech Comirnaty mRNA vaccine in 122 individuals. Our findings show strong Spike RBD antibody responses one week after the second dose with the capacity to block ACE2-Spike protein interaction, however, the antibodies declined significantly at three months after the second dose. The inhibition of ACE2-Spike interaction was weaker with South African (B.1.351) and Brazilian (P.1) than with Wuhan and UK (B.1.1.7) SARS-CoV-2 isolates. At three months 87% of vaccinated individuals developed either CD4+ or CD8+ T cell responses. Those negative for Spike-specific T cell response also tended to have lower Spike-specific antibody levels. In addition, CD4+ T cell response was decreased among vaccinated individuals with elevated levels of senescent CD8+ TEMRA cells. We found a weaker antibody response and faster waning of antibodies in older vaccinated individuals, which correlated with fewer side effects at the time of vaccinations. Implications of all the available evidence Our results show that two doses of Pfizer-BioNTech Comirnaty mRNA vaccine induce a strong antibody and T cell responses to Spike RBD region but the antibody levels are declined at three months after the second dose. Nevertheless, even at three months, the anti-Spike RBD antibody levels stay significantly higher than at prevaccination, after the first dose of vaccine, or in Covid-19 postinfection. Our findings implicate older individuals to have fewer vaccination adverse effects and weaker immune response after the vaccination and point to the need for more individualized vaccination protocols, in particular among older people.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
COVID-19 vaccine BNT162b1 elicits human antibody and TH1 T cell responses
Sahin, U., Muik, A., Derhovanessian, E., Vogler, I., Kranz, L. M., Vormehr, M., Baum, A., Pascal, K., Quandt, J., Maurus, D., et al. (2020) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-020-2814-7 · Cited by 1,977
Mulligan, M. J., Lyke, K. E., Kitchin, N., Absalon, J., Gurtman, A., Lockhart, S., Neuzil, K., Raabe, V., Bailey, R., Swanson, K. A., et al. (2020) · doi:10.1101/2020.06.30.20142570 · Cited by 1,569
Multiple SARS-CoV-2 variants escape neutralization by vaccine-induced humoral immunity
Garcia-Beltran, W. F., Lam, E. C., St. Denis, K., Nitido, A. D., Garcia, Z. H., Hauser, B. M., Feldman, J., Pavlovic, M. N., Gregory, D. J., Poznansky, M. C., et al. (2021) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2021.03.013 · Cited by 1,353
Antibody Responses in Seropositive Persons after a Single Dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccine
Krammer, F., Srivastava, K., Alshammary, H., Amoako, A. A., Awawda, M. H., Beach, K. F., Bermúdez-González, M. C., Bielak, D. A., Carreño, J. M., Chernet, R. L., et al. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmc2101667 · Cited by 696
Antibody Persistence through 6 Months after the Second Dose of mRNA-1273 Vaccine for Covid-19
Doria-Rose, N., Suthar, M. S., Makowski, M., O’Connell, S., McDermott, A. B., Flach, B., Ledgerwood, J. E., Mascola, J. R., Graham, B. S., Lin, B. C., et al. (2021) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmc2103916 · Cited by 673
Goel, R. R., Apostolidis, S. A., Painter, M. M., Mathew, D., Pattekar, A., Kuthuru, O., Gouma, S., Hicks, P., Meng, W., Rosenfeld, A. M., et al. (2021) · Science Immunology · doi:10.1126/sciimmunol.abi6950 · Cited by 655
Abu Jabal, K., Ben-Amram, H., Beiruti, K., Batheesh, Y., Sussan, C., Zarka, S., & Edelstein, M. (2021) · Eurosurveillance · doi:10.2807/1560-7917.es.2021.26.6.2100096 · Cited by 271
Asymptomatic and symptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infections elicit polyfunctional antibodies
Dufloo, J., Grzelak, L., Staropoli, I., Madec, Y., Tondeur, L., Anna, F., Pelleau, S., Wiedemann, A., Planchais, C., Buchrieser, J., et al. (2021) · Cell Reports Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.xcrm.2021.100275 · Cited by 89
Cited by
Fiolet, T., Kherabi, Y., MacDonald, C.-J., Ghosn, J., & Peiffer-Smadja, N. (2022) · Clinical Microbiology and Infection · doi:10.1016/j.cmi.2021.10.005 · Cited by 911
Pérez-Then, E., Lucas, C., Monteiro, V. S., Miric, M., Brache, V., Cochon, L., Vogels, C. B. F., Malik, A. A., De la Cruz, E., Jorge, A., et al. (2022) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41591-022-01705-6 · Cited by 401
COVID vaccine immunity is waning — how much does that matter?
Dolgin, E. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/d41586-021-02532-4 · Cited by 123
A self-amplifying RNA vaccine against COVID-19 with long-term room-temperature stability
Voigt, E. A., Gerhardt, A., Hanson, D., Jennewein, M. F., Battisti, P., Reed, S., Singh, J., Mohamath, R., Bakken, J., Beaver, S., et al. (2022) · npj Vaccines · doi:10.1038/s41541-022-00549-y · Cited by 89
(2022) · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104042 · Cited by 87
(2022) · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-22552-y · Cited by 48
(2022) · doi:10.1186/s12916-022-02480-4 · Cited by 43
Bouillon, K., Baricault, B., Botton, J., Jabagi, M.-J., Bertrand, M., Semenzato, L., Le Vu, S., Drouin, J., Dray-Spira, R., Weill, A., et al. (2022) · BMJ Medicine · doi:10.1136/bmjmed-2021-000104 · Cited by 31
Meggiolaro, A., Sane Schepisi, M., Farina, S., Castagna, C., Mammone, A., Siddu, A., Stefanelli, P., Boccia, S., & Rezza, G. (2022) · Expert Review of Vaccines · doi:10.1080/14760584.2022.2130773 · Cited by 17
Odak, I., Riemann, L., Sandrock, I., Cossmann, A., Ramos, G. M., Hammerschmidt, S. I., Ritter, C., Friedrichsen, M., Hassan, A., Dopfer-Jablonka, A., et al. (2024) · eBioMedicine · doi:10.1016/j.ebiom.2023.104947 · Cited by 17
(2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.03.29.22273086 · Cited by 4
Metadata
- Authors
- Naaber, P., Tserel, L., Kangro, K., Sepp, E., Jürjenson, V., Adamson, A., Haljasmägi, L., Rumm, A. P., Maruste, R., Kärner, J., Gerhold, J. M., Planken, A., Ustav, M., Kisand, K., & Peterson, P.
- Venue
- The Lancet Regional Health - Europe
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-11
- Volume
- 10
- Pages
- 100208
- ISSN
- 2666-7762 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3198831432
- Cited by
- 645
- References
- 8
- FWCI
- 44.27
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.