The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effect of instruction type and dyadic or individual emulation on the quality of higher-order peer feedback in EFL
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“The results showed that the collaborative revision strategy instruction via modelling was more effective for improving undergraduates' revision skills than practising the instructed strategy following guiding questions presented in a handout.”
From Learning paths in synthesis writing: Which learning path contributes most to which learning outcome? (2020) · cites this paper as Van Steendam et al. 2010
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Multilevel analysis techniques and applications
Hox, J. J., Moerbeek, M., & van de Schoot, R. (2002) · Cited by 6,006
Goldstein, H. (2006) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2006.s417 · Cited by 4,960
The Psychology of Written Composition
Cumming, A. H., Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1989) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/327270 · Cited by 2,806
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
(1977) · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-10517-x · Cited by 2,457
MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S. W., & Fitzgerald, J. (2005) · Cited by 2,327
Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (1989) · Springer series in cognitive development · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-3618-4 · Cited by 1,926
A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445 · Cited by 1,609 · cited 3×
“They are particularly effective in teaching students criteria for reflecting on and evaluating writing, and thereby improving their revision skills (Englert et al., 2006; Graham & Perin, 2007).”
BackgroundCollaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches
Jones, A. C. (2000) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/s0360-1315(00)00011-7 · Cited by 1,511
Barron, B. (2003) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1203_1 · Cited by 1,446
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Hayes, 1987, Cognitive processes in revision, Vol. 2, 176
- MacArthur, 2004, Revision with struggling writers, Vol. 13, 125
- Mittan, 1989, The peer review process: harnessing students' communicative power, 207
- Oxford University Press, 2001
- Rijlaarsdam, 2000, What do writers learn from peer comments on argumentative texts?, Vol. 6, 167
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning
Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007 · Cited by 615
“…the training of peer assessors in assessment skills (Sluijsmans et al., 2002), (d) methods of teaching students how to provide peer feedback (Van Steendam et al., 2010), (e) the matching principles for peers (Van den Berg, Admiraal, & Pilot, 2006), and (f) teacher support for peer feedback (Van…”
MethodEffective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions
van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merriënboer, J. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004 · Cited by 536
Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students’ writing
Steiss, J., Tate, T., Graham, S., Cruz, J., Hebert, M., Wang, J., Moon, Y., Tseng, W., Warschauer, M., & Olson, C. B. (2024) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894 · Cited by 509
Student revision with peer and expert reviewing
Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. A. (2009) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006 · Cited by 470
Strijbos, J.-W., Narciss, S., & Dünnebier, K. (2009) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008 · Cited by 399
Peer reviewers learn from giving comments
Cho, Y. H., & Cho, K. (2011) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-010-9146-1 · Cited by 294
“Previous studies showed that observing a writing or revision model and emulating the model are much beneficial for novice writers (Couzijn 1999; Van Steendam et al. 2010; Zimmerman and Kitsantas 2002).”
BackgroundPeer Feedback in Second Language Writing
Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1017/s0261444816000161 · Cited by 322
“Quantitative studies like experimental and quasi-experimental studies in particular have been adopted to address the effectiveness of peer feedback on student text revisions and writing performance (Kamimura 2006; Trautmann 2006; Lundstrom & Baker 2009; Van Steendam et al. 2010; Baleghizadeh & Arab 2011; Diab 2011; Bi…”
BackgroundInfluentialPeer assessment as collaborative learning: A cognitive perspective
Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2009) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.005 · Cited by 257
“When task performance is conducted more interactively, discursive processes such as explaining (Webb, 1989), arguing (Andriessen, Baker, & Suthers, 2003) or questioning (King, 1997) may facilitate high-level cognitive processing.”
BackgroundUnravelling peer assessment: Methodological, functional, and conceptual developments
Strijbos, J.-W., & Sluijsmans, D. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.002 · Cited by 223
van Gennip, N. A. E., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.010 · Cited by 259
Methodological quandaries in studying process and outcomes in peer assessment
Topping, K. J. (2009) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.003 · Cited by 187
Hovardas, T., Tsivitanidou, O. E., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.09.019 · Cited by 176
Peer assessment without assessment criteria
Jones, I., & Alcock, L. (2013) · Studies in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/03075079.2013.821974 · Cited by 138
“The promotion and valuing of peer learning (Slavin 1991) is a common motivation for implementing and studying peer assessment (Topping 2003; Gielen et al. 2011; Kollar and Fischer, 2010; van Steendam et al. 2010; van Zundert, Sluijsmans and van Merriënboer 2010).”
BackgroundRotsaert, T., Panadero, E., & Schellens, T. (2018) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0339-8 · Cited by 126
“Peer feedback quality can be approached in two ways: (a) in terms of accuracy, consistency across assessors, and/or concordance with teacher feedback (Van Steendam et al. 2010) or (b) in terms of content and/or style characteristics (Gielen et al. 2010).”
BackgroundWu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2020) · American Educational Research Journal · doi:10.3102/0002831220945266 · Cited by 150
Quality of Feedback in Higher Education: A Review of Literature
Haughney, K., Wakeman, S., & Hart, L. (2020) · Education Sciences · doi:10.3390/educsci10030060 · Cited by 104
Investigating secondary school students’ unmediated peer assessment skills
Tsivitanidou, O., Zacharia, Z. C., & Hovardas, T. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.08.002 · Cited by 101
Exploring L2 writers' collaborative revision interactions and their writing performance
Hanjani, A. M., & Li, L. (2014) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.03.004 · Cited by 97
“Learning to write on the one hand, and to evaluate on the other, is a dual agenda which may eventually lead to cognitive overload and frustration in novice writers (van Steendam et al., 2010).”
BackgroundEffect of teacher modeling and feedback on EFL students’ peer review skills in peer review training
Min, H. (2016) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2016.01.004 · Cited by 99
Gan, M. J. S., & Hattie, J. (2014) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-014-9319-4 · Cited by 87
“More importantly, instructional support and training that target specific feedback features appeared to have a more positive effect on students’ understanding and use of feedback (Gielen et al. 2010; Hattie and Timperley 2007; Min 2005; Nelson and Schunn 2009; Sluijsmans et al. 2002; Van Steendam et al. 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialWu, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2020) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2020.101897 · Cited by 83
“Peer feedback quality was evaluated in terms of “the correctness, exhaustiveness and explicitness of student comments” (Van Steendam et al., 2010: 321).”
BackgroundInfluentialGielen, M., & Wever, B. D. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2015.07.012 · Cited by 80
Effects of digital video-based feedback environments on pre-service teachers’ feedback competence
Prilop, C. N., Weber, K. E., & Kleinknecht, M. (2019) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2019.08.011 · Cited by 90
Groenendijk, T., Janssen, T., Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H. (2011) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8279.2011.02052.x · Cited by 83
“For the poems, we used a design of overlapping rating teams (Van den Bergh & Eiting, 1989), because of the large number of products and the time required to assess these.”
BackgroundInfluentialSelf-citationGielen, M., & Wever, B. D. (2015) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12096 · Cited by 78
EFL writing revision with blind expert and peer review using a CMC open forum
Wu, W.-C. V., Petit, E., & Chen, C. (2014) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2014.937442 · Cited by 69
Using scaffolded rubrics to improve peer assessment in a MOOC writing course
Ashton, S., & Davies, R. (2015) · Distance Education · doi:10.1080/01587919.2015.1081733 · Cited by 67
“…degree to which student assessments correspond to those of experts or the degree to which the content of student evaluation adheres to characteristics of good feedback recognized in the theory of the discipline (Falchikov & Gold fi nch, 2000; Van Steendam, Rijlaarsdam, Sercu, & Van den Bergh, 2010).”
BackgroundLearning to write in an online writing center: The effect of learning styles on the writing process
Waes, L. V., van Weijen, D., & Leijten, M. (2014) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2013.12.009 · Cited by 68
Combined Training of One Cognitive and One Metacognitive Strategy Improves Academic Writing Skills
Wischgoll, A. (2016) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00187 · Cited by 74
Groenendijk, T., Janssen, T., Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H. (2013) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.05.001 · Cited by 64
Self-citationPredictive Effects of Online Peer Feedback Types on Performance Quality
Yu, F. Y., & Wu, C. P. (2013) · Tamkang University Institutional Repository (TKUIR) · Cited by 63
The effects of autonomy support on student engagement in peer assessment
Yuan, J., & Kim, C. (2017) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-017-9538-x · Cited by 65
Effective Feedback Design Using Free Technologies
Yuan, J., & Kim, C. (2015) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633115571929 · Cited by 56
Teacher modeling on EFL reviewers’ audience-aware feedback and affectivity in L2 peer review
Chang, C. Y.-H. (2015) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.04.001 · Cited by 52
The Effects of Online Feedback Training on Students’ Text Revision
Yang, Y.-F., & Meng, W.-T. (2013) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44331 · Cited by 44
“Finally, the teacher’s perceptions toward online feedback training should be investigated in the future (Steendam et al., 2010).”
BackgroundEffective Use of Peer Assessment in a Graduate Level Writing Assignment: A Case Study
Landry, A., Jacobs, S., & Newton, G. S. (2014) · International Journal of Higher Education · doi:10.5430/ijhe.v4n1p38 · Cited by 40
Effects of anonymity on online peer review in second-language writing
van den Bos, A. H., & Tan, E. (2019) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2019.103638 · Cited by 45
Learning paths in synthesis writing: Which learning path contributes most to which learning outcome?
Mateos, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., Martín, E., Cuevas, I., Van den Bergh, H., & Solari, M. (2020) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-020-09508-3 · Cited by 37
Self-citationGao, Y., & Wang, X. (2022) · Journal of language and Education · doi:10.17323/jle.2022.15962 · Cited by 40
“Van Steendam et al. (2010) argued that instructional methods comprising modeling, practice, and feedback are ‘‘very powerful’’ and can help learners ‘‘acquire new, complex cognitive skills, such as writing, revision and learning the different steps in a strategy’’ (p. 318).”
BackgroundPapadopoulos, P. M., Λάγκας, Θ., & Demetriadis, S. (2012) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2012.01.005 · Cited by 36
Masruddin, M. (2018) · Arab World English Journal · doi:10.2139/ssrn.3258815 · Cited by 36
Zhang, X., & McEneaney, J. E. (2019) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.259 · Cited by 40
Adopting ChatGPT as a writing buddy in the advanced L2 writing class
Strobl, C., Menke-Bazhutkina, I., Abel, N., & Michel, M. C. (2024) · Technology in Language Teaching & Learning · doi:10.29140/tltl.v6n1.1168 · Cited by 59
Nguyen, H. V., Xiong, W., & Litman, D. J. (2017) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-016-0136-6 · Cited by 34
Ebadijalal, M., & Yousofi, N. (2021) · Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2021.1957990 · Cited by 48
“Besides fostering their con fi dence in their capabilities, peer feedback was also found to foster self-directed performance (Sivan 2000), engendering among the participants a sense of responsibility towards their own learning (Steendam et al. 2010).”
BackgroundAlqassab, M., Strijbos, J.-W., & Ufer, S. (2018) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2018.1485012 · Cited by 33
The mediating effect of instruction on pair composition in L2 revision and writing
Van Steendam, E., Rijlaarsdam, G. C. W., Van den Bergh, H. H., & Sercu, L. (2014) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-014-9318-5 · Cited by 32
Self-citationWang, Y.-H., & Liao, H.-C. (2017) · Symmetry · doi:10.3390/sym9080141 · Cited by 30
“’s study [10] demonstrated that using collaborative learning in English as a foreign language (EFL) acquisition can help students become more independent and autonomous.”
Explicating peer feedback quality and its impact on feedback implementation in EFL writing
He, W., & Gao, Y. (2023) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1177094 · Cited by 29
The Role of Readers in Writing Development: Writing Students Bringing Their Texts to the Test
Rijlaarsdam, G., Braaksma, M. A. H., Couzijn, M., Janssen, T., Kieft, M., Raedts, M., Steendam, E. V., Toorenaar, A., & van den Bergh, H. (2009) · SAGE Publications Ltd eBooks · doi:10.4135/9780857021069.n31 · Cited by 29
Self-citationHarney, O., Hogan, M., & Quinn, S. (2017) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-017-9263-9 · Cited by 34
“For example, Van Steendam et al., 2010) found that training students through modelling of peer feedback behaviour followed by emulation of this behaviour, led to more correct and explicit feedback when evaluating a peer ’ s text.”
BackgroundResultAlqassab, M., Strijbos, J.-W., & Ufer, S. (2018) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.07.003 · Cited by 27
Interpreting quality as evaluated by peer students
Su, W. (2019) · The Interpreter and Translator Trainer · doi:10.1080/1750399x.2018.1564192 · Cited by 27
Optimal feedback structure and interactional pattern in formative peer practices: Students' beliefs
Ghahari, S., & Sedaghat, M. (2018) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2018.02.003 · Cited by 26
Supporting the uptake process with dialogic peer screencast feedback: a sociomaterial perspective
Wood, J. M. (2022) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2022.2042243 · Cited by 25
“…found that peer feedback is often focused at the sentence or ‘ local level ’ on aspects of grammar or vocabulary choice and is rarely able to focus on substantive ‘ global ’ aspects such as criticality, structure, or answering the question (Liu and Sadler 2003; Min 2006; Van Steendam et al. 2010).”
BackgroundRaedts, M., Steendam, E. V., Grez, L. D., Hendrickx, J., & Masui, C. (2017) · Journal of Writing Research · doi:10.17239/jowr-2017.08.03.01 · Cited by 19
The Effects of Peer Feedback on the Essay Writing Performances of EFL Students
Uymaz, E. (2019) · International Journal of Curriculum and Instruction · Cited by 19
Grade one peer and teacher feedback on student writing
Peterson, S. S., & Portier, C. (2012) · Education 3-13 · doi:10.1080/03004279.2012.670256 · Cited by 16
“Another effective practice involved students observing an exemplary dyadic interaction of two peers using a set of criteria to give feedback and then applying what they learned when giving feedback to their own peers (Van Steendam et al. 2010).”
BackgroundResultStudent views of peer assessment at the International School of Lausanne
Foley, S. (2013) · Journal of Research in International Education · doi:10.1177/1475240913509766 · Cited by 26
“…of articles published in the Journal of Learning and Instruction that year (Cho and MacArthur, 2010; Gielen et al., 2010; Kollar and Fischer, 2010; Strijbos et al., 2010; Strijbos and Sluijsmans, 2010; Topping, 2009; Van Gennip et al., 2010; Van Steendam et al., 2010; Van Zundert et al., 2010).”
BackgroundInfluentialZhang, Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2023) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2023.102210 · Cited by 19
Online Peer Discourse in a Writing Classroom.
Choi, J. (2014) · International journal on teaching and learning in higher education · Cited by 15
Students’ Perspectives on Peer Assessment
Hébel, F. L., Constantinou, C. P., Hošpesová, A., Grob, R., Holmeier, M., Montpied, P., Moulin, M., Petr, J., Rokos, L., Stuchlíková, I., et al. (2017) · Contributions from science education research · doi:10.1007/978-3-319-63248-3_6 · Cited by 13
Alnasser, S. M. N. (2022) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440221123021 · Cited by 20
“…as a “detailed feedback which addresses global concerns in a text, use metalan-guage to diagnose textual problems, and suggests specific revisions” (Van Steendam et al., 2010, p. 319), and can have a greater impact on the learning process (Tang, 1999; Van Steendam et al., 2010; Zhu, 1995).”
BackgroundTopping, K. J. (2022) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/b978-0-12-818630-5.09021-7 · Cited by 15
Jiang, J., & Yu, Y. (2014) · International Journal of Information and Communication Technology Education · doi:10.4018/ijicte.2014070103 · Cited by 11
Kollar, I., & Fischer, F. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-662-55754-9_17 · Cited by 12
Bibliometric Analysis of Research on Peer Feedback in Teaching and Learning
Lam, C. N. C., & Habil, H. (2021) · Pertanika journal of social science & humanities · doi:10.47836/pjssh.29.3.25 · Cited by 13
van der Loo, J., Krahmer, E., & van Amelsvoort, M. (2019) · Frontiers in Education · doi:10.3389/feduc.2019.00019 · Cited by 10
van Blankenstein, F. M., O’Sullivan, J., Saab, N., & Paul Steendijk, A. (2021) · BMC Medical Education · doi:10.1186/s12909-021-02755-z · Cited by 10
“However, to our knowledge only one study investigated the effect of peer modelling on giving peer feedback [33].”
BackgroundBoon, S. (2015) · Education 3-13 · doi:10.1080/03004279.2013.856930 · Cited by 9
“Once children are familiar with the success criteria they can then be trained how to provide focused feedback (Topping 2009; Van Steendam et al. 2010).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialStudents' argumentation performance in online learning environments: Bridging culture and gender
Ranjbaran, F., Babaee, M., Parvaneh Akhteh Khaneh, M., Gohari, M., Daneshvar Ghorbani, B., Taghizadeh Kerman, N., Banihashem, S. K., & Noroozi, O. (2023) · International Journal of Technology in Education · doi:10.46328/ijte.460 · Cited by 8
Exploring Writing Circles as Innovative, Collaborative Writing Structures with Teacher Candidates
Roberts, S. K., Blanch, N., & Gurjar, N. (2017) · ScholarWorks - WMU (Western Michigan University) · Cited by 8
Bridging the language and cultural gaps: the use of blogs
García-Sánchez, S., & Rojas-Lizana, S. (2012) · Technology, Pedagogy and Education · doi:10.1080/1475939x.2012.719396 · Cited by 28
“…some researchers who have specifically dealt with tandem language learning (Alvarez González et al., 1996; O’Dowd, 2007), telecollaboration (Belz & Müller-Hartmann, 2003; Thorne, 2006), interculturality (Byram, 1989; Sercu, 2006) and peer feedback (Van Steendam et al., 2010; Ware & O’Dowd, 2008).”
BackgroundSouissi, H., Souissi, M. A., Trabelsi, O., Souissi, O., Souissi, H., Chikh, S., Bragazzi, N. L., & Souissi, N. (2022) · International Journal of Sports Science & Coaching · doi:10.1177/17479541221122385 · Cited by 7
van Blankenstein, F. V., Truțescu, G.-O., van der Rijst, R. M., & Saab, N. (2019) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-019-09482-5
Hamidnia, M., Ketabi, S., & Amirian, Z. (2020) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · doi:10.22132/tel.2020.100594 · Cited by 7
Toward the Integration of Peer Reviewing and Computational Linguistics Approaches
Park, J., & Cho, K. (2016) · Journal of Educational Computing Research · doi:10.1177/0735633116656454 · Cited by 5
“…findings that training how to evaluate is essential to ensure the validity of comments and grades (Berg, 1999; MacArthur, Graham, & Schwartz, 1991; Van Steendam, Rijlaarsdam, Sercu, & Van den Bergh, 2010), our study demonstrates that students can generate beneficial comments and give reliable…”
BackgroundTrained Peer Written Feedback and Teacher Written Feedback: Similar or Different?
Min, H. (2018) · English Teaching & Learning · doi:10.1007/s42321-018-0009-1 · Cited by 6
“subjects [21, 28] and between-subjects research designs [21] have also reported similar successful training effects.”
BackgroundResultInfluentialLópez, M. B., Steendam, E. V., Speelman, D., & Buyse, K. (2021) · Journal of Writing Research · doi:10.17239/jowr-2021.13.01.02 · Cited by 13
Effects of peer instruction on academic achievement: a meta-analysis
Öz, E. (2023) · Pedagogies An International Journal · doi:10.1080/1554480x.2023.2246447 · Cited by 13
“…(Liu & Chen, 2020), motivation (Dawson, 2004; Hodges et al., 2001; Ning & Downing, 2010), reading comprehension (Flores & Duran, 2016; Thurston et al., 2021; Van Keer, 2004), and language learning (Alrajhi & Aldhafri, 2015; Bradford-Watts, 2011; Philp et al., 2013; Van Steendam et al., 2010).”
Msiza, V., Zondi, T., & Couch, L. (2020) · Journal of Education · doi:10.17159/2520-9868/i79a04 · Cited by 6
Hilk, C. L. (2013) · University of Minnesota Digital Conservancy (University of Minnesota) · Cited by 6
Aben, J. E. J., Lara, M. M., Timmermans, A. C., Dingyloudi, F., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2024) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-024-09660-0 · Cited by 4
“First, earlier research emphasized the crucial role of teacher instruction for optimal learning gain from peer-feedback activities (e.g., Min, 2005 ; Van Steendam et al., 2010 ).”
Aben, J. E. J., Timmermans, A. C., Dingyloudi, F., & Strijbos, J.-W. (2023) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2023.101248 · Cited by 6
Analysis of Using Multimodal Feedback in Writing Instruction from EFL Learners’ Perspective
Zhang, Y. (2018) · English Language and Literature Studies · doi:10.5539/ells.v8n4p21 · Cited by 4
Vocabulary learning from reading: examining interactions between task and learner related variables
Wu, X., Lowyck, J., Sercu, L., & Elen, J. (2012) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-012-0113-x · Cited by 4
Self-citationAn Exploration of the Reliability and Validity of Peer Assessment of Writing in Secondary Education
Meletiadou, E., & Tsagari, D. (2014) · doi:10.2478/9788376560915.p14 · Cited by 3
“According to previous research (Sluijsmans 2002; Van Steendam et al. 2010), substantial training and practice is required to develop competence in PA.”
InfluentialAlnasser, S. M. N. (2022) · Journal of Language Teaching and Research · doi:10.17507/jltr.1303.24 · Cited by 3
“Van Steendam et al. (2010) hold that for FB to be effective, it should be provided in an adequate and timely manner.”
BackgroundNegotiating Meaning at a Distance: Peer Feedback in Electronic Learning Translation Environments
Lewandowska‐Tomaszczyk, B., Thelen, M., van Egdom, G.-W., Verbeeck, D., & Bogucki, Ł. (2016) · Peter Lang eBooks · doi:10.3726/978-3-653-05899-4/18 · Cited by 3
The case of 'Yummy Yummy' - a replication of an intervention program
Amir, A., Atkin, H., & Rijlaarsdam, G. (2021) · L1 Educational Studies in Language and Literature · doi:10.17239/l1esll-2021.21.01.16 · Cited by 3
“…to write, be it writing an argumentative text (Braaksma et al., 2002, 2004, 2017; Couzijn, 1999; Raedts et al., 2007), a synthesis text (Raedts et al., 2007; van Ockenburg et al., 2021), or cooperatively revising texts or evaluating written synthesis texts of peers (van Steendam et al., 2010).”
BackgroundSelf-citationde Smet, M. J. R., Brand‐Gruwel, S., & Kirschner, P. A. (2023) · Journal of Computer Assisted Learning · doi:10.1111/jcal.12825 · Cited by 5
Biton, Y. (2025) · Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education · doi:10.29333/ejmste/15794 · Cited by 4
Alnasser, S. M. N. (2018) · Universal Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.13189/ujer.2018.060804 · Cited by 3
Foreign Language Learners' Perceptions of Chatbot-Assisted Speech-Giving Tasks
Huang, S. R., & Wang, W. (2025) · International Conference on Educational and Information Technology · doi:10.1109/iceit64364.2025.10975878 · Cited by 2
Aben, J. E. J., de Jong, J., Coupé, G., Meijntz, M., & Bouwer, R. (2025) · Reading and Writing · doi:10.1007/s11145-025-10743-8 · Cited by 2
Alnasser, S. M. N., & Alyousef, H. S. (2014) · International Journal of English Language Education · doi:10.5296/ijele.v3i1.6764 · Cited by 3
“Learners in an L2 context are likely to have an interest in mastering micro writing features, which is likely to lead them to neglect the macro features (Chenoweth & Hayes, 2001; Van Steendam et al., 2010; Van Steendam et al., 2014) that are considered important in the advanced-level English academic programmes in hig…”
BackgroundInfluentialLee, I. (2017) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-10-3924-9_7 · Cited by 1
Improving student reading comprehension through editorship
Higley, C., Elliott, K. C., & Cheruvelil, J. (2018) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2018.1553030 · Cited by 2
Wali, F. (2017) · Arrow@dit (Dublin Institute of Technology) · Cited by 2
Impact of Teacher and Peer Feedback on University Students' Spelling and Punctuation
Al-Farsi, S., & Slimi, Z. (2025) · European Journal of English Language Studies · doi:10.12973/ejels.5.2.113 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Steendam, E., Rijlaarsdam, G., Sercu, L., & Van den Bergh, H.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Venue
- Learning and Instruction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 316-327
- ISSN
- 0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2157381667
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 51.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Learning and Instruction (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Lirias (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- peer feedback, social cognitive model, observation, practice, strategy acquisition, EFL writing, business English, global feedback
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
