The DOI matches its Crossref record; 73 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effect of instruction type and dyadic or individual emulation on the quality of higher-order peer feedback in EFL
Open accessOverview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source doesn’t support the claim as written.
In the citing paper
“The results showed that the collaborative revision strategy instruction via modelling was more effective for improving undergraduates' revision skills than practising the instructed strategy following guiding questions presented in a handout.”
From Learning paths in synthesis writing: Which learning path contributes most to which learning outcome? (2020) · cites this paper as Van Steendam et al. 2010
Checked by a reasoning model — may be wrong.
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences
Cohen, J. (1990) · Computers Environment and Urban Systems · doi:10.1016/0198-9715(90)90050-4 · Cited by 65,417
Multilevel analysis techniques and applications
Hox, J. J., Moerbeek, M., & van de Schoot, R. (2002) · Cited by 6,006
Goldstein, H. (2006) · Technometrics · doi:10.1198/tech.2006.s417 · Cited by 4,960
The Psychology of Written Composition
Cumming, A. H., Bereiter, C., & Scardamalia, M. (1989) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/327270 · Cited by 2,806
Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences
(1977) · doi:10.1016/c2013-0-10517-x · Cited by 2,457
MacArthur, C. A., Graham, S. W., & Fitzgerald, J. (2005) · Cited by 2,327
Self-Regulated Learning and Academic Achievement
Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (1989) · Springer series in cognitive development · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-3618-4 · Cited by 1,926
A meta-analysis of writing instruction for adolescent students
Graham, S., & Perin, D. (2007) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.445 · Cited by 1,609 · cited 3×
“They are particularly effective in teaching students criteria for reflecting on and evaluating writing, and thereby improving their revision skills (Englert et al., 2006; Graham & Perin, 2007).”
BackgroundCollaborative Learning: Cognitive and Computational Approaches
Jones, A. C. (2000) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/s0360-1315(00)00011-7 · Cited by 1,511
Barron, B. (2003) · Journal of the Learning Sciences · doi:10.1207/s15327809jls1203_1 · Cited by 1,446
A new framework for understanding cognition and affect in writing.
Hayes, J. R. (1996) · Cited by 1,442
Statistical Power Analysis For The Behavioral Sciences Revised Edition
Daly, J., & Cohen, J. (1987) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2286629 · Cited by 1,399
Collaborative learning : cognitive and computational approaches
Dillenbourg, P. (1999) · Cited by 1,321
Goulias, K. G. (2002) · New directions in civil engineering · doi:10.1201/9781420042283.ch9 · Cited by 1,292
Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections
Storch, N. (2005) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002 · Cited by 1,052
Social origins of self-regulatory competence
Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (1997) · Educational Psychologist · doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3204_1 · Cited by 937
Social Cognitive Theory and Self-Regulated Learning
Schunk, D. H. (1989) · Springer series in cognitive development · doi:10.1007/978-1-4612-3618-4_4 · Cited by 935
Toward an Understanding of the Distinct Nature of L2 Writing: The ESL Research and Its Implications
Silva, T. (1993) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587400 · Cited by 860
Revision Strategies of Student Writers and Experienced Adult Writers
Sommers, N. (1980) · College Composition & Communication · doi:10.2307/356588 · Cited by 749 · cited 3×
“Furthermore, less competent revisers have fewer advanced revision strategies at their command (Faigley & Witte, 1981; Sommers, 1980).”
BackgroundResearch on Written Composition: New Directions for Teaching
Witte, S. P., Larson, R. L., & Hillocks, G. (1987) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/357721 · Cited by 694
Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning
Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007 · Cited by 615
Multilevel Statistical Models (3rd ed.)
Lethonen, R. (2005) · Quarterly Publications of the American Statistical Association · Cited by 544
d’Arcais, G. B. F., & Levelt, W. J. M. (1970) · Cited by 525
Fluency in Writing: Generating Text in L1 and L2
CHENOWETH, N. A., & HAYES, J. R. (2001) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088301018001004 · Cited by 518
Topping, K., & Ehly, S. (1998) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781410603678 · Cited by 504
The effects of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality
Berg, E. C. (1999) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80115-5 · Cited by 485
The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality
Min, H.-T. (2006) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003 · Cited by 482
Faigley, L., & Witte, S. (1981) · College Composition & Communication · doi:10.2307/356602 · Cited by 481
Student revision with peer and expert reviewing
Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. A. (2009) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006 · Cited by 470
Peer review negotiations: Revision activities in ESL writing instruction
Mendonça, C. O., Johnson, K. E., & Mendonca, C. O. (1994) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587558 · Cited by 446
Training students to become successful peer reviewers
Min, H. (2005) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2004.11.003 · Cited by 431
Coherence, Cohesion, and Writing Quality
Witte, S. P., & Faigley, L. L. (1981) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/356693 · Cited by 420
Acquiring writing revision and self-regulatory skill through observation and emulation
Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2002) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.4.660 · Cited by 412 · cited 4×
“Zimmerman and Kitsantas (2002) stress that, for emulation to take place, students should ideally receive social feedback from others about their performance.”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialStrijbos, J.-W., Narciss, S., & Dünnebier, K. (2009) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008 · Cited by 399
Alamargot, D., & Chanquoy, L. (2001) · Studies in Writing · doi:10.1007/978-94-010-0804-4 · Cited by 378
Topping, K. J., & Ehly, S. W. (2001) · Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) · doi:10.4135/9781412963848.n207 · Cited by 338
Levy, C. M., & Ransdell, S. (2013) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203811122 · Cited by 304
Kirschner, F., PAAS, F. G. W. C., & Kirschner, P. A. (2009) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2008.12.008 · Cited by 303
Graham, S., Schwartz, S. S., & MacArthur, C. A. (1993) · Journal of Learning Disabilities · doi:10.1177/002221949302600404 · Cited by 261
Richness in Writing: Empowering Esl Students
Johnson, D. M., & Roen, D. H. (1989) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 242
Social-Cognitive Dimensions of Interaction in L2 Peer Revision
de Guerrero, M. C. M., & Villamil, O. S. (1994) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4781.1994.tb02065.x · Cited by 226
Coaching student writers to be effective peer evaluators
Stanley, J. (1992) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(92)90004-9 · Cited by 219
Collaborative writing: The effects of metacognitive prompting and structured peer interaction
Yarrow, F., & Topping, K. J. (2001) · British Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1348/000709901158514 · Cited by 216
Theories, Models and Methodology in Writing Research
Rijlaarsdam, G., Bergh, V. D. H., & Couzijn, M. (1996) · Amsterdam University Press eBooks · doi:10.5117/9789053561973 · Cited by 183
Self-citationExecutive control in the revising of students with learning and writing difficulties.
Graham, S. (1997) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.2.223 · Cited by 180
Repetition in the Collaborative Discourse of L2 Learners: A Vygotskian Perspective
DiCamilla, F. J., & Antón, M. (1997) · Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes · doi:10.3138/cmlr.53.4.609 · Cited by 179
Revising in two languages: A multi-dimensional comparison of online writing revisions in L1 and FL
Stevenson, M., Schoonen, R., & de Glopper, K. (2006) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.06.002 · Cited by 179
Observational learning and the effects of model-observer similarity.
Braaksma, M. A. H., Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H. (2002) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.405 · Cited by 171
Self-citationTenets of Sociocultural Theory in Writing Instruction Research.
Englert, C. S., Mariage, T. V., & Dunsmore, K. (2006) · Cited by 155
Revision Cognitive and Instructional Processes
Allal, L. K., Chanquoy, L., & Largy, P. (2004) · Studies in writing · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1048-1 · Cited by 142
Effects of Training for Peer Response on Students' Comments and Interaction
Zhu, W.-N. (1995) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088395012004004 · Cited by 141
Baker, S., Gersten, R. M., & Scanlon, D. J. (2002) · Learning Disabilities Research and Practice · doi:10.1111/1540-5826.00032 · Cited by 122
A Peer Editor Strategy: Guiding Learning-Disabled Students in Response and Revision
Stoddard, B., & MacArthur, C. A. (1993) · Research in the Teaching of English · doi:10.58680/rte199315422 · Cited by 109
Learning to write by observation of writing and reading processes: effects on learning and transfer
Couzijn, M. (1999) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/s0959-4752(98)00040-1 · Cited by 109
ESL student response stances in a peer-review task
Mangelsdorf, K., & Schlumberger, A. (1992) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(92)90005-a · Cited by 109
Metalinguistic Activity in Learning to Write
Camps, A., & Milian, M. (1999) · Amsterdam University Press eBooks · doi:10.5117/9789053563410 · Cited by 102
The Revising Processes of Sixth-Grade Writers With and Without Peer Feedback
Brakel, V. L. (1990) · The Journal of Educational Research · doi:10.1080/00220671.1990.10885987 · Cited by 99
Tang, G. M. (1999) · TESL Canada Journal · doi:10.18806/tesl.v16i2.716 · Cited by 97
The Psychology of Written Language: Developmental and Educational Perspectives
Frawley, W., & Martlew, M. (1985) · Language · doi:10.2307/413469 · Cited by 96
Potential Problems with Peer Responding in ESL Writing Classes
Leki, I. (1990) · The CATESOL journal. · doi:10.5070/b5.36653 · Cited by 81
Introduction to Peer-Assisted Learning
Ehly, S. W. (1998) · doi:10.4324/9781410603678-7 · Cited by 76
An aptitude–treatment interaction approach to writing-to-learn
Kieft, M., Rijlaarsdam, G., & van den Bergh, H. (2007) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.07.004 · Cited by 74
Self-citationEffects of Collaborative Revision on Children’s Ability to Write Understandable Narrative Texts
Boscolo, P., & Ascorti, K. (2004) · Studies in writing · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1048-1_10 · Cited by 64
Individual and cooperative computer-writing and revising: Who gets the best results?
Zammuner, V. (1995) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/0959-4752(95)00005-n · Cited by 46
Paz, S. D. L. (2007) · Reading & Writing Quarterly · doi:10.1080/10573560701277609 · Cited by 46
Writing and Learning to Write: A Double Challenge
Rijlaarsdam, G., & Couzijn, M. (2000) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/0-306-47614-2_9 · Cited by 40
Self-citationSocial-Cognitive Dimensions of Interaction in L2 Peer Revision
de Guerrero, M. C. M., & Villamil, O. S. (1994) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.2307/328586 · Cited by 39
Pedagogy: teaching for learning
Tomlinson, P. D., Dockrell, J. E., & Winne, P. H. (2005) · British Psychological Society eBooks · Cited by 19
Attention Strategies in revising foreign language text.
Broekkamp, H., & van den Bergh, H. (1996) · UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) · Cited by 19
Collaborative Revision and Metacognitive Reflection in a Situation of Narrative Text Production
Rouiller, Y. (2004) · Studies in writing · doi:10.1007/978-94-007-1048-1_11 · Cited by 14
Effects of Peer Critiquing and Model Analysis on the Quality of Biology Student Laboratory Reports.
Flynn, E. A. (1982) · Cited by 13
Zellermayer, M., Olshtain, E., & Cohen, J. (1991) · Linguistics and Education · doi:10.1016/0898-5898(91)90015-b · Cited by 4
Psychology and The teaching of writing in 60 minutes
Rijlaarsdam, G., Braaksma, M. A. H., Couzijn, M., Janssen, T., Kieft, M., Broekkamp, H., & van den Bergh, H. (2004) · UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) · Cited by 3
Self-citation
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Hayes, 1987, Cognitive processes in revision, Vol. 2, 176
- MacArthur, 2004, Revision with struggling writers, Vol. 13, 125
- Mittan, 1989, The peer review process: harnessing students' communicative power, 207
- Oxford University Press, 2001
- Rijlaarsdam, 2000, What do writers learn from peer comments on argumentative texts?, Vol. 6, 167
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Improving the effectiveness of peer feedback for learning
Gielen, S., Peeters, E., Dochy, F., Onghena, P., & Struyven, K. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.007 · Cited by 615
“…the training of peer assessors in assessment skills (Sluijsmans et al., 2002), (d) methods of teaching students how to provide peer feedback (Van Steendam et al., 2010), (e) the matching principles for peers (Van den Berg, Admiraal, & Pilot, 2006), and (f) teacher support for peer feedback (Van…”
MethodEffective peer assessment processes: Research findings and future directions
van Zundert, M., Sluijsmans, D., & van Merriënboer, J. (2010) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.004 · Cited by 536
Comparing the quality of human and ChatGPT feedback of students’ writing
Steiss, J., Tate, T., Graham, S., Cruz, J., Hebert, M., Wang, J., Moon, Y., Tseng, W., Warschauer, M., & Olson, C. B. (2024) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2024.101894 · Cited by 509
Student revision with peer and expert reviewing
Cho, K., & MacArthur, C. A. (2009) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.006 · Cited by 470
Strijbos, J.-W., Narciss, S., & Dünnebier, K. (2009) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008 · Cited by 399
Metadata
- Authors
- Van Steendam, E., Rijlaarsdam, G., Sercu, L., & Van den Bergh, H.
- Affiliations
- Utrecht University (NL)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Venue
- Learning and Instruction
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2010-08
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 316-327
- ISSN
- 0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2157381667
- Cited by
- 124
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 9 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 6
- FWCI
- 51.13
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Learning and Instruction (publishedVersion)
- UvA-DARE (University of Amsterdam) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Lirias (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Keywords
- peer feedback, social cognitive model, observation, practice, strategy acquisition, EFL writing, business English, global feedback
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
