Cited by 38Innovative Teaching and Learning MethodsScience Education and PedagogyEducational Strategies and Epistemologies

Small-group collaboration and individual knowledge acquisition: The processes of growth during adolescence and early adulthood

Open access
Howe, Christine, Zachariou, Antonia·2019·Learning and Instruction

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.10.007

Cites

72 of 72 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 73 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Howe, C., & Zachariou, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Cambridge (GB)
  • University of Roehampton (GB)
Corresponding author
Howe, Christine
Venue
Learning and Instruction
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-04
Volume
60
Pages
263-274
ISSN
0959-4752 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2769185445
Cited by
38
References
73
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 3
FWCI
6.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Learning and Instruction (publishedVersion)
  • Cambridge University Engineering Department Publications Database (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo (University of Cambridge) (submittedVersion)
  • Apollo
Funders
British Academy
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Education › Science Education and Pedagogy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Keywords
small group collaboration, adolescent development, early adulthood, group dialogue, collaborative construction, physics problem solving, object motion prediction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review