CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 43

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sex-specific response strategies in mental rotation

Hirnstein, Marco, Bayer, Ulrike, Hausmann, Markus·2009·Learning and Individual Differences
DOI 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.11.006
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.11.006

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 23

  1. Alexander, 2007, Androgens and eye movements in women and men during a test of mental rotation ability, Hormones and Behavior, 52, 197, 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2007.01.011 · DOI
  2. Bao, 2004, The relationship between self confidence and mental rotation performance, International Journal of Psychology, 39, 63
  3. Carpenter, 1999, Graded functional activation in the visuospatial system with the amount of task demand, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 9, 10.1162/089892999563210 · DOI
  4. Casey, 1996, Understanding individual differences in spatial ability within females: A nature/nurture interactionist framework, Developmental Review, 16, 241, 10.1006/drev.1996.0009 · DOI
  5. Delgado, 1996, Sex differences in visuospatial ability: do performance factors play such an important role?, Memory & Cognition, 24, 504, 10.3758/BF03200938 · DOI
  6. Geiser, C., Lehmann, W., Corth, M., & Eid, M. (2008). Quantitative and qualitative change in children's mental rotation performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 419–429. · DOI
  7. Geiser, 2006, Separating “srotators” from “nonrotators” in the Mental Rotations Test: A multigroup latent class analysis, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 41, 261, 10.1207/s15327906mbr4103_2 · DOI
  8. Goldstein, 1990, Sex differences in visual-spatial ability: the role of performance factors, Memory & Cognition, 18, 546, 10.3758/BF03198487 · DOI
  9. Jordan, 2002, Women and men exhibit different cortical activation patterns during mental rotation tasks, Neuropsychologia, 40, 2397, 10.1016/S0028-3932(02)00076-3 · DOI
  10. Kerkman, 2000, Impossible “mental rotation” problems. A mismeasure of women's spatial abilities, Learning and Individual Differences, 12, 253, 10.1016/S1041-6080(01)00039-5 · DOI
  11. Masters, 1998, The gender difference on the Mental Rotations test is not due to performance factors, Memory & Cognition, 26, 444, 10.3758/BF03201154 · DOI
  12. Peters, 2005, Sex differences and the factor of time in solving Vandenberg and Kuse mental rotation problems, Brain and Cognition, 57, 176, 10.1016/j.bandc.2004.08.052 · DOI
  13. Peters, 1995, A redrawn Vandenberg and Kuse Mental Rotations Tests: different versions and factors that affect performance, Brain and Cognition, 28, 39, 10.1006/brcg.1995.1032 · DOI
  14. Peters, 2006, Hand preference for writing and associations with selected demographic and behavioral variables in 255,100 subjects: The BBC internet study, Brain and Cognition, 62, 177, 10.1016/j.bandc.2006.04.005 · DOI
  15. Pezaris, 1991, Girls who use “masculine” problem-solving strategies on a spatial task: proposed genetic and environmental factors, Brain and Cognition, 17, 1, 10.1016/0278-2626(91)90062-D · DOI
  16. Raabe, 2006, Sex differences in mental rotation strategy, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 103, 917, 10.2466/pms.103.3.917-930 · DOI
  17. Schultz, 1991, The contribution of solution strategy to spatial performance, Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45, 474, 10.1037/h0084301 · DOI
  18. Shepard, 1971, Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects, Science, 171, 701, 10.1126/science.171.3972.701 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Stumpf, 1993, Performance factors and gender-related differences in spatial ability: Another assessment, Memory & Cognition, 21, 828, 10.3758/BF03202750 · DOI
  20. Vandenberg, 1978, Mental rotations, a group test of three-dimensional spatial visualization, Perceptual and Motor Skills, 47, 599, 10.2466/pms.1978.47.2.599 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Voyer, 1997, Scoring procedure, performance factors, and magnitude of sex differences in spatial performance, American Journal of Psychology, 110, 259, 10.2307/1423717 · DOI
  22. Voyer, 2004, Gender differences on the mental rotations test: a factor analysis, Acta Psychologica, 117, 79, 10.1016/j.actpsy.2004.05.003 · DOI
  23. Voyer, 1995, Magnitude of sex differences in spatial abilities: A meta-analysis and consideration of critical variables, Psychological Bulletin, 117, 250, 10.1037/0033-2909.117.2.250 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hirnstein, M., Bayer, U., & Hausmann, M.
Venue
Learning and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2009-06
Volume
19
Issue
2
Pages
225-228
ISSN
1041-6080
DOI
10.1016/j.lindif.2008.11.006
Cited by
43
References
2
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review