The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 76 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Students' extracurricular reading behavior and the development of vocabulary and reading comprehension
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Such arguments are consistent with negative correlations reported between the frequency of digital media use and text comprehension in adolescents (Duncan et al., 2015; Pfost et al., 2013)”
From Don't throw away your printed books: A meta-analysis on the effects of reading media on reading comprehension (2018) · cites this paper as Pfost et al., 2013
In the citing paper
“a pattern that does not align with previous research showing larger effect sizes for linear-communicative digital reading habits than for social-communicative ones (Duncan et al., 2016; McGeown et al., 2016; Pfost et al., 2013).”
From Do New Forms of Reading Pay Off? A Meta-Analysis on the Relationship Between Leisure Digital Reading Habits and Text Comprehension (2025) · cites this paper as Pfost et al., 2013
Citations
Cites
Nylund, K. L., Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. O. (2007) · Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705510701575396 · Cited by 11,415
Visible learning: a synthesis of over 800 meta‐analyses relating to achievement
Carter, M. (2009) · Educational Psychology · doi:10.1080/01443410903415150 · Cited by 7,696
(2008) · Cited by 6,939
Pearson, P. D., Barr, (. E., Kamil, M. L., Mosenthal, P. B., & Barr, R. (1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-5764 · Cited by 6,850
Statistics and Causal Inference
Holland, P. W. (1986) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1986.10478354 · Cited by 5,293
Stanovich, K. E. (1986) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1598/rrq.21.4.1 · Cited by 5,222
Socioeconomic Status and Academic Achievement: A Meta-Analytic Review of Research
Sirin, S. R. (2005) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543075003417 · Cited by 4,687
A standard international socio-economic index of occupational status
Ganzeboom, H. B. G., de Graaf, P. M., & Treiman, D. J. (1992) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/0049-089x(92)90017-b · Cited by 3,120
Facebook and academic performance
Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024 · Cited by 1,578
To read or not to read: a meta-analysis of print exposure from infancy to early adulthood
Mol, S. E., & Bus, A. G. (2011) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/a0021890 · Cited by 1,299
Cited by
Sorted by citations
PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework
OECD (2019) · Programme for international student assessment/Internationale Schulleistungsstudie · doi:10.1787/b25efab8-en · Cited by 2,216
Delgado, P., Vargas, C., Ackerman, R., & Salmerón, L. (2018) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2018.09.003 · Cited by 664
The Influence of Reading on Vocabulary Growth: A Case for a Matthew Effect
Duff, D., Tomblin, J. B., & Catts, H. W. (2015) · Journal of Speech Language and Hearing Research · doi:10.1044/2015_jslhr-l-13-0310 · Cited by 180
Torppa, M., Niemi, P., Vasalampi, K., Lerkkanen, M.-K., Tolvanen, A., & Poikkeus, A.-M. (2020) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.13241 · Cited by 177
Stutz, F., Schaffner, E., & Schiefele, U. (2015) · Learning and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.022 · Cited by 175
Metadata
- Authors
- Pfost, M., Dörfler, T., & Artelt, C.
- Affiliations
- University of Bamberg (DE)
- Heidelberg University of Education (DE)
- Corresponding author
- Pfost, Maximilian
- Venue
- Learning and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2013-08
- Volume
- 26
- Pages
- 89-102
- ISSN
- 1041-6080 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2114804407
- Cited by
- 155
- References
- 76
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 28 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 3
- FWCI
- 25.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Learning and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › Literacy and Educational Practices
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Reading and Literacy Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Educational Methods and Media Use
- Keywords
- extracurricular reading, reading behavior, vocabulary development, reading comprehension, reading literacy, online reading, email, chatting, high school students, latent class analysis, reading achievement
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
