Incentives and test anxiety may moderate the effect of retrieval on learning
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Test anxiety does not always have an effect on memory.
“whereas test anxiety does not always have an effect (Clark et al., 2018; Yang et al., 2020).”
From Does Retrieval Practice Protect Memory Against Stress? A Meta-Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as Clark et al., 2018
Cites
Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations: Classic Definitions and New Directions
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000) · Contemporary Educational Psychology · doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1020 · Cited by 18,666 · see citing works
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.125.6.627 · Cited by 7,176 · see citing works
Test-Enhanced Learning: Taking Memory Tests Improves Long-Term Retention
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01693.x · Cited by 2,867 · see citing works
The power of testing memory: Basic research and implications for educational practice
Roediger, H. L., & Karpicke, J. D. (2006) · Perspectives on Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1745-6916.2006.00012.x · Cited by 2,037 · see citing works
The critical role of retrieval practice in long-term retention
Roediger, H. L., & Butler, A. C. (2011) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2010.09.003 · Cited by 1,796 · see citing works
The Critical Importance of Retrieval for Learning
Karpicke, J. D., & Roediger, H. L. (2008) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1152408 · Cited by 1,791 · see citing works
Stress, anxiety, and cognitive interference: reactions to tests
Sarason, I. G. (1984) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.4.929 · Cited by 959 · see citing works
New Perspectives in Attentional Control Theory
Eysenck, M. W., & Derakshan, N. (2011) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2010.08.019 · Cited by 826 · see citing works
Testing improves long-term retention in a simulated classroom setting
Butler, A. C., & Roediger, H. L. (2007) · European Journal of Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1080/09541440701326097 · Cited by 434 · see citing works
McDaniel, M. A., Agarwal, P. K., Huelser, B. J., McDermott, K. B., & Roediger, H. L. (2011) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0021782 · Cited by 360 · see citing works
Generalizing test-enhanced learning from the laboratory to the classroom
Mcdaniel, M. A., Roediger, H. L., & Mcdermott, K. B. (2007) · Psychonomic Bulletin & Review · doi:10.3758/bf03194052 · Cited by 326 · see citing works
Recent research on human learning challenges conventional instructional strategies
Rohrer, D., & Pashler, H. (2010) · Educational Researcher · doi:10.3102/0013189x10374770 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Development of a Short Form of the Test Anxiety Inventory (TAI)
Taylor, J., & Deane, F. P. (2002) · The Journal of General Psychology · doi:10.1080/00221300209603133 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Agarwal, P. K., D'Antonio, L., Roediger, H. L., McDermott, K. B., & McDaniel, M. A. (2014) · Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.jarmac.2014.07.002 · Cited by 119 · see citing works
Individual differences in the effects of retrieval from long-term memory
Brewer, G. A., & Unsworth, N. (2012) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2011.12.009 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Keresztes, A., Kaiser, D., Kovács, G., & Racsmány, M. (2014) · Cerebral Cortex · doi:10.1093/cercor/bht158 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Does Retrieval Practice Protect Memory Against Stress? A Meta-Analysis
Mihaylova, M., Zocca, M., Kliegel, M., & Rothen, N. (2025) · Swiss Psychology Open · doi:10.5334/spo.101 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
- Authors
- Clark, D. A., Crandall, J. R., & Robinson, D. H.
- Affiliations
- Texas A&M University – Central Texas (US)
- Washington University in St. Louis (US)
- The University of Texas at Arlington (US)
- Corresponding author
- Clark, Daniel A.
- Venue
- Learning and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-04
- Volume
- 63
- Pages
- 70-77
- ISSN
- 1041-6080 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2795176242
- Cited by
- 4
- References
- 16
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 0.30
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Learning and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes
- Keywords
- retrieval practice, incentives, test anxiety, boundary conditions, learning
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
