Cited by 114Memory Processes and InfluencesCognitive Functions and MemoryCognitive Abilities and Testing

Individual differences in the effects of retrieval from long-term memory

Brewer, Gene A., Unsworth, Nash·2012·Journal of Memory and Language

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jml.2011.12.009

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Brewer, G. A., & Unsworth, N.
Affiliations
Arizona State University (US)
Corresponding author
Brewer, Gene A.
Venue
Journal of Memory and Language
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-04
Volume
66
Issue
3
Pages
407-415
ISSN
0749-596X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2106275559
Cited by
114
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 10 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Memory and Language (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Georgia
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Memory Processes and Influences
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Functions and Memory
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Cognitive Abilities and Testing
Keywords
testing effect, retrieval practice, individual differences, long-term memory, working memory capacity, attentional control, episodic memory, fluid intelligence, paired-associate learning, memory accessibility

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review