Cited by 59Education, Achievement, and GiftednessCareer Development and DiversityInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Middle school engagement profiles: Implications for motivation and achievement in science

Open access
Bae, Christine L., DeBusk-Lane, Morgan·2019·Learning and Individual Differences

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101753

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bae, C. L., & DeBusk-Lane, M.
Affiliations
Virginia Commonwealth University (US)
Corresponding author
Bae, Christine L.
Venue
Learning and Individual Differences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2019-08
Volume
74
Pages
101753
ISSN
1041-6080 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2959781657
Cited by
59
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4
FWCI
6.78
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Learning and Individual Differences (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Science Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Career Development and Diversity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
student engagement, engagement profiles, junior high school students, science achievement, achievement goal orientation, mastery orientation, self-efficacy, science motivation, behavioral engagement, emotional engagement, cognitive engagement, latent profile analysis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review