Cited by 251Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsEducation, Achievement, and GiftednessInnovative Teaching and Learning Methods

Daily autonomy supporting or thwarting and students’ motivation and engagement in the high school science classroom.

Patall, Erika A., Steingut, Rebecca R., Vasquez, Ariana C., Trimble, Scott S., Pituch, Keenan A., Freeman, Jen L.·2018·Journal of Educational Psychology

Abstract

This diary study provided the first classroom-based empirical test of the relations between student perceptions of high school science teachers’ various autonomy supporting and thwarting practices and students’ motivation and engagement on a daily basis over the course of an instructional unit. Perceived autonomy supporting practices were hypothesized to predict autonomous motivation and engagement outcomes, while perceived autonomy thwarting practices were hypothesized to predict controlled motivation and disaffection outcomes. In line with this prediction, multilevel modeling results based on regular reports of 208 high school students in 41 science classes across 6 weeks suggested that 4 perceived daily supports (choice provision, consideration for student preferences and interests, rationales for importance, and question opportunities) and 1 daily thwart (use of uninteresting activities) predicted changes in daily autonomous motivation and engagement. In contrast, changes in students’ daily controlled motivation and disaffection were predicted primarily by 3 perceived daily thwarts (controlling messages, suppression of student perspectives, and use of uninteresting activities). Results also suggested that practices interacted such that the perception of thwarts generally bolstered desirable daily relationships between perceived supports and students’ motivation and the perception of supports generally mitigated undesirable daily relationships between thwarts and motivation. Supplemental exploratory results suggested that the effects of choice and suppression of student perspectives may be heterogeneous and depend on the outcome and/or the presence of other practices. Implications of the findings are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2018 APA, all rights reserved)

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/edu0000214

Cites

68 of 68 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • What a PE teacher says and does to support students' autonomy may not be identical to what science teachers do.

    “Similarly, what a PE teacher says and does to support students' autonomy (Haerens et al. 2013) may not be identical to what science teachers do (Patall et al. 2018).”
  • Day-to-day variations in perceived parental and teacher need support have been related to daily fluctuations in children's well-being and engagement.

    “Day-to-day variations in perceived parental (Van der Kaap-Deeder et al. 2017) and teacher (Patall et al. 2018) need support have similary been related to daily fluctuations in children's wellbeing and engagement.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Patall, E. A., Steingut, R. R., Vasquez, A. C., Trimble, S. S., Pituch, K. A., & Freeman, J. L.
Affiliations
The University of Texas at Austin (US)
Venue
Journal of Educational Psychology
Published
2018-02
Volume
110
Issue
2
Pages
269-288
ISSN
  • 0022-0663 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-2176
OpenAlex
W2622700099
Cited by
251
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 37 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 42 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 10
FWCI
19.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Journal of Educational Psychology (publishedVersion)
Funders
William T. Grant Foundation (180042)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Education, Achievement, and Giftedness
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
Keywords
autonomy support, student motivation, student engagement, high school science education, autonomous motivation, controlled motivation, disaffection, teacher practices

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review