Adolescents' peer status profiles and differences in school engagement and loneliness trajectories: A person-centered approach
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Most authors have found the absence of, or only slight temporal changes in children's sociometric status.
“with most authors finding the absence of, or only slight temporal changes in children's sociometric status (see Cillessen, Bukowski, Haselager, 2000; Engels et al., 2019).”
From The The effects of cognitive, social, and emotional intelligence on children’s sociometric status in a new peer group (2023) · cites this paper as Engels et al., 2019
Cites
School Engagement: Potential of the Concept, State of the Evidence
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.3102/00346543074001059 · Cited by 12,581 · see citing works
The Bioecological Model of Human Development
Bronfenbrenner, U., & Morris, P. A. (2007) · Handbook of Child Psychology · doi:10.1002/9780470147658.chpsy0114 · Cited by 5,760 · see citing works
Group-Based Modeling of Development
NAGIN, D. (2005) · doi:10.4159/9780674041318 · Cited by 4,164 · see citing works
Handbook of Research on Student Engagement
(2012) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7 · Cited by 3,050 · see citing works
Vanhalst, J., Luyckx, K., & Goossens, L. (2014) · Social Development · doi:10.1111/sode.12019 · Cited by 151 · see citing works
Self-citationSchool Life and Adolescents' Self-Esteem Trajectories
Morin, A. J. S., Maïano, C., Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., & Janosz, M. (2013) · Child Development · doi:10.1111/cdev.12089 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Lorijn, S. J., Engels, M. C., Huisman, M., & Veenstra, R. (2022) · Journal of Youth and Adolescence · doi:10.1007/s10964-021-01506-z · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Self-citationKnopp, K. A. (2023) · Kwartalnik Naukowy Fides et Ratio · doi:10.34766/fetr.v55i3.1218
- Authors
- Engels, M. C., Colpin, H., Wouters, S., Van Leeuwen, K., Bijttebier, P., Van Den Noortgate, W., Goossens, L., & Verschueren, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Groningen (NL)
- KU Leuven (BE)
- Corresponding author
- Engels, Maaike Claudine
- ORCID
- Venue
- Learning and Individual Differences
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2019-10
- Volume
- 75
- Pages
- 101759
- ISSN
- 1041-6080 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2967154485
- Cited by
- 40
- References
- 6
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 1
- FWCI
- 3.77
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Locations
- Learning and Individual Differences (publishedVersion)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
- Lirias (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- KU Leuven
- Fonds Wetenschappelijk Onderzoek
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
- Keywords
- peer status, peer nominations, school engagement, loneliness, adolescents, behavioral engagement, gender differences, academic development, psychosocial development, longitudinal trajectories
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review