Cited by 479Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing TechnologiesInnovations in Concrete and Construction MaterialsPolysaccharides Composition and Applications

Investigation on lemon juice gel as food material for 3D printing and optimization of printing parameters

Yang, Fanli, Zhang, Min, Bhandari, Bhesh, Liu, Yaping·2018·LWT

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to develop a new 3D printing food constructs based on lemon juice gel system. We investigated the effect of potato starch (10, 12.5, 15, 17.5 and 20 g/100 g) on the rheological properties and mechanical properties of lemon juice gels. Besides, the influence of printing parameters (nozzle height, nozzle diameter, extrusion rate and nozzle movement speed) on the quality of printed products were also studied. The results show that it is suitable to make the size of the nozzle height the same with that of the nozzle diameter, which could not be regarded as a key factor that affects print quality. An equation is proposed to explain the relationship between extrusion rate, nozzle diameter and nozzle movement speed. In this printing system, the 1 mm nozzle diameter, 24 mm3/s extrusion rate and 30 mm/s nozzle movement speed were found to be the optimal parameters to print 3D constructs matching the target geometry with fine resolution, more smooth surface texture, and fewer point defects with no compressed deformation.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.08.054

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Jagadiswaran and colleagues transformed grape pomace and broken wheat into cookies using a home-made fabricated extrusion 3D printer.

    “One of the example of food 3d print in utilizing waste was done by Jagadiswaran and colleagues [96]. The food wastes, which are grape pomace and broken wheat, are transformed into cookies.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Yang, F., Zhang, M., Bhandari, B., & Liu, Y.
Affiliations
  • Jiangnan University (CN)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Min
Venue
LWT
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-01
Volume
87
Pages
67-76
ISSN
0023-6438 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2747835132
Cited by
479
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 24 · 2025: 55 · 2024: 73 · 2023: 56 · 2022: 79 · 2021: 70 · 2020: 54 · 2019: 44 · 2018: 24
FWCI
21.15
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
LWT (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • China State Key Laboratory of Food Science and Technology Innovation Project (SKLF-ZZA-201706)
  • Jiangsu Province (China)“Collaborative Innovation Center for Food Safety and Quality Control”Industry Development Program, Jiangsu Province (China) Infrastructure Project (BM2014051)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Building and Construction › Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Polysaccharides Composition and Applications
Keywords
3D food printing, edible ink, potato starch, rheological properties, mechanical properties, printing parameters, extrusion speed, nozzle diameter, print quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review