Cited by 132Frailty in Older AdultsGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model OrganismsAging, Health, and Disability

Cumulative index of health disorders as an indicator of aging-associated processes in the elderly: Results from analyses of the National Long Term Care Survey

Open access
Kulminski, A., Yashin, A., Arbeev, K., Akushevich, I., Ukraintseva, S., Land, K., Manton, K.·2007·Mechanisms of Ageing and Development

Abstract

Background We employ an approach based on the elaborated frailty index (FI), which is capable of taking into account variables with mild effect on the aging, health and survival outcomes, and investigate the connections between the FI, chronological age and the aging-associated outcomes in the elderly.Methods Cross-sectional analysis of pooled data from the National Long Term Care Survey (NLTCS) assessing health and functioning of the U.S. elderly in 1982, 1984, 1989, 1994, and 1999.Results Distributions of frequency, residual life span, mortality rate, and relative risk of death are remarkably similar over age and FI. Coefficients of correlation between FI and age are low both for males (0.127, p<.01) and females (0.221, p<.01). The FI-specific age patterns show deceleration at advanced ages. The FI can provide order of magnitude better resolution in estimating mean remaining life span compared to age. Males have smaller FI than females while males' mortality risks are higher. For short-time horizons, the FI and age are largely independently associated with mortality risks.Conclusions The FI: (i) can be considered as an adequate sex-specific indicator of the aging-associated processes in the elderly, (ii) can characterize these processes independently of age, and (iii) is a better characteristic of the aging phenotype than chronological age.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mad.2006.12.004

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In each study, the frailer the person is (the higher the deficit count) the more vulnerable they are to adverse outcomes.

    “In each study, the frailer the person is (the higher the deficit count) the more vulnerable they are to adverse outcomes [5,8,11].”

    From A standard procedure for creating a frailty index (2008) · cites this paper as [8]

  • The results yielded by the frailty index have been consistent between surveys evaluated by our group and by others even though not every frailty index considers the same deficits or number of deficits.

    “the results yielded by the frailty index have been consistent between surveys evaluated by our group [4-7] and by others [8-11] even though not every frailty index considers the same deficits, or even the same number of deficits.”

    From A standard procedure for creating a frailty index (2008) · cites this paper as [8]

  • Acceleration of deficit accumulation is characteristic of older people prior to death.

    “In addition, acceleration of deficit accumulation is characteristic of older people prior to death [8].”

    From A standard procedure for creating a frailty index (2008) · cites this paper as [8]

  • Mortality exponentially increases with the accumulation of deficits.

    “mortality exponentially increases with the accumulation of deficits [5,8,19].”

    From A standard procedure for creating a frailty index (2008) · cites this paper as [8]

  • It does not matter if study A considered 40 deficits from set X and study B considered 60 deficits from set Y; the estimates from each (e.g. rate of deficit accumulation, relationship with mortality, limit) appear to be similar.

    “it does not matter if study A considered 40 deficits from set X of deficits and study B considered 60 deficits from set Y of deficits; the estimates from each (e.g. the rate of deficit accumulation, the relationship between deficit accumulation and mortality, or the limit to deficit accumulation) appear to be similar.”

    From A standard procedure for creating a frailty index (2008) · cites this paper as [8]

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kulminski, A., Yashin, A., Arbeev, K., Akushevich, I., Ukraintseva, S., Land, K., & Manton, K.
Affiliations
Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Kulminski, A.
Venue
Mechanisms of Ageing and Development
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2007-03
Volume
128
Issue
3
Pages
250-258
ISSN
0047-6374 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2039868002
Cited by
132
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 8 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
4.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mechanisms of Ageing and Development (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (P01AG008761, R01AG027019, R01AG028259, U01AG007198, K12AG000982, K12-AG-000982-05, P30AG034424)
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R03HD050374)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Aging, Health, and Disability
Keywords
frailty index, aging, older adults, mortality risk, sex differences, aging phenotypes, National Long Term Care Survey
MeSH terms
Age Factors, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Data Interpretation, Statistical, Female, Health Status Indicators, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Mortality, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk, Sex Factors, United States, Logistic Models, Proportional Hazards Models, Health Care Surveys

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review