Cited by 3,076Frailty in Older AdultsAging and Gerontology ResearchPharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes

Frailty in relation to the accumulation of deficits

Rockwood, K., Mitnitski, A.·2007·The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences

Abstract

This review article summarizes how frailty can be considered in relation to deficit accumulation. Recalling that frailty is an age-associated, nonspecific vulnerability, we consider symptoms, signs, diseases, and disabilities as deficits, which are combined in a frailty index. An individual's frailty index score reflects the proportion of potential deficits present in that person, and indicates the likelihood that frailty is present. Although based on a simple count, the frailty index shows several interesting properties, including a characteristic rate of accumulation, a submaximal limit, and characteristic changes with age in its distribution. The frailty index, as a state variable, is able to quantitatively summarize vulnerability. Future studies include the application of network analyses and stochastic analytical techniques to the evaluation of the frailty index and the description of other state variables in relation to frailty.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1093/gerona/62.7.722

Cites

55 of 55 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A frailty index value of 0.67 appears to identify a level beyond which further deficit accumulation is not sustainable and death is likely.

    “a value of 0.67 appears to identify a level of frailty beyond which further deficit accumulation is not sustainable and death is likely to supervene (78).”

    From Frailty in elderly people (2013) · cites this paper as [78]

  • The results yielded by the frailty index have been consistent between surveys evaluated by our group and by others even though not every frailty index considers the same deficits or number of deficits.

    “the results yielded by the frailty index have been consistent between surveys evaluated by our group [4-7] and by others [8-11] even though not every frailty index considers the same deficits, or even the same number of deficits.”

    From A standard procedure for creating a frailty index (2008) · cites this paper as [5]

  • Across several frailty index measures, people accumulate deficits, on average, at about 0.03/year.

    “across several frailty index measures, people accumulate deficits, on average, at about 0.03/year [4,5].”

    From A standard procedure for creating a frailty index (2008) · cites this paper as [5]

  • In each study, the frailer the person is (the higher the deficit count) the more vulnerable they are to adverse outcomes.

    “In each study, the frailer the person is (the higher the deficit count) the more vulnerable they are to adverse outcomes [5,8,11].”

    From A standard procedure for creating a frailty index (2008) · cites this paper as [5]

  • The frailty index shows a consistent, sub-maximal limit at about 2/3 of the deficits that are considered.

    “The frailty index also shows a consistent, sub-maximal limit at about 2/3 of the deficits that are considered.”

    From A standard procedure for creating a frailty index (2008) · cites this paper as [5]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rockwood, K., & Mitnitski, A.
Affiliations
Dalhousie University (CA)
Corresponding author
Rockwood, K.
Venue
The Journals of Gerontology Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
Published
2007-07-01
Volume
62
Issue
7
Pages
722-727
ISSN
  • 1079-5006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-535X
OpenAlex
W2129700906
Cited by
3,076
References
55
Citations by year
2026: 368 · 2025: 304 · 2024: 309 · 2023: 251 · 2022: 278 · 2021: 255 · 2020: 241 · 2019: 195 · 2018: 171 · 2017: 159 · 2016: 128 · 2015: 84 · 2014: 70 · 2013: 65 · 2012: 55
FWCI
2.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Journals of Gerontology Series A (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Frailty in Older Adults
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology › Aging and Gerontology Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Geriatrics and Gerontology › Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Keywords
frailty, frailty index, deficit accumulation, age-related susceptibility, state variables, aging, network analysis, stochastic modeling
MeSH terms
Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Aging, Humans, Mathematics, Models, Theoretical, Frail Elderly

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review