The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Distinguishing between terrestrial and autochthonous organic matter sources in marine environments using fluorescence spectroscopy
Open accessAbstract
Abstract The optical properties of chromophoric dissolved organic matter (CDOM) are frequently used as tracers of water masses in bays and estuaries but present unique challenges in the ocean due to the small quantities of organic matter present and the similarities between spectra from coastal and offshore environments. Samples collected on trans-oceanic cruises in the Pacific and Atlantic oceans were used to investigate the optical characteristics of dissolved organic matter in waters with limited freshwater influence (salinity > 30). Parallel Factor Analysis (PARAFAC) of fluorescence spectra revealed that coastal and oceanic dissolved organic matter (DOM) fluorescence could be separated into at least eight separate components: 4–5 humic-like and 3–5 protein-like signals. Two of the humic components were identified as representing terrestrial organic matter and their signals could be traced in the open ocean (Pacific and Atlantic) at levels of approximately 1.5% of riverine concentrations. An additional humic component, traditionally identified as the “marine” or “M” peak, was found to be both sourced from land and produced in the ocean. These results demonstrate that the supply, mixing and removal of terrestrial organic matter in oceanic waters can be observed with relatively simple measurement techniques, suggesting that fluorescence spectroscopy could play a useful role in future studies of the origin and fate of DOM in oceanic environments.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Molecular structure in soil humic substances: the new view
Sutton, R., & Sposito, G. (2005) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es050778q · Cited by 1,316
Cited by
Fluorescence spectroscopy and multi-way techniques. PARAFAC
Murphy, K. R., Stedmon, C. A., Graeber, D., & Bro, R. (2013) · Analytical Methods · doi:10.1039/c3ay41160e · Cited by 2,060
Self-citationOpenFluor– an online spectral library of auto-fluorescence by organic compounds in the environment
Murphy, K. R., Stedmon, C. A., Wenig, P., & Bro, R. (2014) · Anal. Methods · doi:10.1039/c3ay41935e · Cited by 1,110
Self-citationFluorescence as a potential monitoring tool for recycled water systems: A review
Henderson, R. K., Baker, A., Murphy, K. R., Hambly, A., Stuetz, R. M., & Khan, S. J. (2009) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2008.11.027 · Cited by 990
Self-citationIshii, S. K. L., & Boyer, T. H. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es2043504 · Cited by 961
The Global Distribution and Dynamics of Chromophoric Dissolved Organic Matter
Nelson, N. B., & Siegel, D. A. (2013) · Annual Review of Marine Science · doi:10.1146/annurev-marine-120710-100751 · Cited by 428
Metadata
- Authors
- Murphy, K. R., Stedmon, C. A., Waite, T. D., & Ruiz, G. M.
- Venue
- Marine Chemistry
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2008-01
- Volume
- 108
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 40-58
- ISSN
- 0304-4203 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2100992488
- Cited by
- 807
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 11.69
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Distinguishing between terrestrial and autochthonous organic matter sources in marine environments using fluorescence spectroscopy. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.marchem.2007.10.003
- The paper
- Murphy, K. R., Stedmon, C. A., Waite, T. D., & Ruiz, G. M. (2008). Distinguishing between terrestrial and autochthonous organic matter sources in marine environments using fluorescence spectroscopy. Marine Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marchem.2007.10.003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.