Performance of biocompatible PEEK processed by fused deposition additive manufacturing
Open accessIntegrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
FFF is recognized as one of the most cost-effective AM techniques, requiring lower energy levels, minimizing material waste, and being effective in manufacturing time.
“FFF is recognized as one of the most cost-effective AM techniques, requiring lower energy levels compared to other AM methods, minimizing the waste of materials, and being very effective in terms of manufacturing time [175-177].”
From A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction (2024) · cites this paper as [175]
Molded PEEK has a tensile strength of 98 MPa (at yield).
“In comparison, the tensile strength of molded PEEK is 98 MPa (at yield).”
From A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction (2024) · cites this paper as [175]
The reduction in tensile strength from horizontal/0° to vertical/90° PEEK samples is more than 87%.
“which represents a reduction of more than 87% from horizontal/0 ◦ to vertical/90 ◦ samples.”
From A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction (2024) · cites this paper as [175]
PEEK samples with build orientations/raster angles horizontal/0°, horizontal/90°, and vertical/90° had tensile strengths of 82.58±1.03 MPa (at yield), 72.88±1.92 MPa (at break), and 9.99±0.94 MPa (at break), respectively.
“It was found that the tensile strength of the samples with building orientations and raster angles of horizontal/0 ◦ , horizontal/90 ◦ , and vertical/90 ◦ is 82 . 58 ± 1 . 03 MPa (at yield), 72 . 88 ± 1 . 92 MPa (at break), and 9 . 99 ± 0 . 94 MPa (at break), respectively”
From A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction (2024) · cites this paper as [175]
FFF parts, particularly PEEK, exhibit significant anisotropy: strength in the X-Y plane is usually acceptable, but strength in the Z direction is lower.
“One remaining challenge in the FFF of materials, particularly PEEK, is the significant anisotropy in different directions. While the strength in the plane parallel to the layers (X-Y plane) is usually acceptable, parts exhibit lower strength levels in the direction perpendicular to the layers (Z direction) [118,175,202].”
From A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction (2024) · cites this paper as [175]
Cites
Materials Selection in Mechanical Design
Ashby, M., & Cebon, D. (2011) · Elsevier eBooks · doi:10.1016/c2009-0-25539-5 · Cited by 2,688 · see citing works
PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants
Kurtz, S. M., & Devine, J. N. (2007) · Biomaterials · doi:10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013 · Cited by 2,391 · see citing works
A review of melt extrusion additive manufacturing processes: I. Process design and modeling
Turner, B. N., Strong, R. J., & Gold, S. A. (2014) · Rapid Prototyping Journal · doi:10.1108/rpj-01-2013-0012 · Cited by 1,465 · see citing works
Wu, W., Geng, P., Li, G., Zhao, D., Zhang, H., & Zhao, J. X. (2015) · Materials · doi:10.3390/ma8095271 · Cited by 882 · see citing works
Yang, C., Tian, X., Li, D., Cao, Y., Zhao, F., & Shi, C. (2017) · Journal of Materials Processing Technology · doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.04.027 · Cited by 662 · see citing works
Measurements of the mechanical response of unidirectional 3D-printed PLA
Song, Y., Li, Y., Song, W., Yee, K. S., Lee, K., & Tagarielli, V. L. (2017) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2017.03.051 · Cited by 627 · see citing works
Weng, Z., Wang, J., Senthil, T., & Wu, L. (2016) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.045 · Cited by 608 · see citing works
Fused deposition modelling with ABS–graphene nanocomposites
Dul, S., Fambri, L., & Pegoretti, A. (2016) · Composites Part A Applied Science and Manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.03.013 · Cited by 497 · see citing works
Extrusion-based additive manufacturing of PEEK for biomedical applications
Vaezi, M., & Yang, S. (2015) · Virtual and Physical Prototyping · doi:10.1080/17452759.2015.1097053 · Cited by 411 · see citing works
Perez, A. R. T., Shemelya, C. M., English, J. D., Lin, Y., Wicker, R. B., & Roberson, D. A. (2015) · Additive manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2015.02.001 · Cited by 407 · see citing works
Rae, P., Brown, E., & Orler, E. B. (2006) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2006.11.032 · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Welding of 3D-printed carbon nanotube–polymer composites by locally induced microwave heating
Sweeney, C. B., Lackey, B. A., Pospisil, M. J., Achee, T. C., Hicks, V. K., Moran, A. G., Teipel, B. R., Saed, M. A., & Green, M. J. (2017) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.1700262 · Cited by 313 · see citing works
Tensile strength of commercial polymer materials for fused filament fabrication 3D printing
Tanikella, N. G., Wittbrodt, B., & Pearce, J. M. (2017) · Additive manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2017.03.005 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Zaldivar, R. J., Witkin, D. B., McLouth, T. D., Patel, D., Schmitt, K., & Nokes, J. P. (2016) · Additive manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2016.11.007 · Cited by 278 · see citing works
Fracture resistance measurement of fused deposition modeling 3D printed polymers
Aliheidari, N., Tripuraneni, R., Ameli, A., & Nadimpalli, S. P. V. (2017) · Polymer Testing · doi:10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.03.016 · Cited by 248 · see citing works
Spoerk, M., Arbeiter, F. J., Cajner, H., Sapkota, J., & Holzer, C. (2017) · Journal of Applied Polymer Science · doi:10.1002/app.45401 · Cited by 227 · see citing works
In-situ monitoring of strain and temperature distributions during fused deposition modeling process
Kousiatza, C., & Karalekas, D. (2016) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2016.02.099 · Cited by 205 · see citing works
Kantaros, A., & Karalekas, D. (2013) · Materials & Design (1980-2015) · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2013.02.067 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Costa, S. F., Duarte, F. M., & Covas, J. A. (2014) · Virtual and Physical Prototyping · doi:10.1080/17452759.2014.984042 · Cited by 195 · see citing works
Prashantha, K., & Roger, F. (2016) · Journal of Macromolecular Science Part A · doi:10.1080/10601325.2017.1250311 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Fracture behavior of additively manufactured acrylonitrile butadiene styrene (ABS) materials
Hart, K. R., & Wetzel, E. D. (2017) · Engineering Fracture Mechanics · doi:10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.03.028 · Cited by 181 · see citing works
Impact absorption capacity of 3D-printed components fabricated by fused deposition modelling
Tsouknidas, A., Pantazopoulos, M. S., Katsoulis, I., et al. (2016) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.154 · Cited by 178 · see citing works
Spoerk, M., Sapkota, J., Weingrill, G., Fischinger, T., Arbeiter, F. J., & Holzer, C. (2017) · Macromolecular Materials and Engineering · doi:10.1002/mame.201700143 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Printing and characterisation of Kagome lattice structures by fused deposition modelling
Gautam, R., Idapalapati, S., & Feih, S. (2017) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2017.10.022 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Wu, W., Geng, P., Zhao, J., Zhang, Y., Rosen, D. W., & Zhang, H. B. (2014) · Materials Research Innovations · doi:10.1179/1432891714z.000000000898 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Cicala, G., Latteri, A., Curto, B. D., Russo, A. L., Recca, G., & Farè, S. (2017) · Journal of Applied Biomaterials & Functional Materials · doi:10.5301/jabfm.5000343 · Cited by 114 · see citing works
Interfacial mechanical behavior of 3D printed ABS
Cole, D. P., Riddick, J. C., Jaim, H. M. I., Strawhecker, K. E., & Zander, N. E. (2016) · Journal of Applied Polymer Science · doi:10.1002/app.43671 · Cited by 113 · see citing works
Karger-Kocsis, J., & FRIEDRICH, K. (1986) · Polymer · doi:10.1016/0032-3861(86)90272-7 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Ning, F., Cong, W., Hu, Z., et al. (2017) · Journal of Composite Materials · doi:10.1177/0021998317692659 · Cited by 99 · see citing works
Incorporation of graphitic nano‐filler and poly(lactic acid) in fused deposition modeling
Wang, Y., Zhang, J., Wu, J. R., Wang, X., & Deng, Y. (2017) · Journal of Applied Polymer Science · doi:10.1002/app.44703 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Kumar, S., Wardle, B. L., & Arif, M. F. (2016) · ACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · doi:10.1021/acsami.6b13038 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Self-citationPredicting processing parameters in high temperature laser sintering (HT-LS) from powder properties
Berretta, S., Evans, K. E., & Ghita, O. R. (2016) · Materials & Design · doi:10.1016/j.matdes.2016.04.097 · Cited by 80 · see citing works
Additive Manufacturing of Poly(propylene) by Means of Melt Extrusion
Hertle, S., Drexler, M., & Drummer, D. (2016) · Macromolecular Materials and Engineering · doi:10.1002/mame.201600259 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Stress Reduction of 3D Printed Compliance‐Tailored Multilayers
Kumar, S., Wardle, B. L., Arif, M. F., & Ubaid, J. (2017) · Advanced Engineering Materials · doi:10.1002/adem.201700883 · Cited by 65 · see citing works
Self-citationProcessing poly(ether etherketone) an a 3D printer for thermoplastic modelling
Valentan, B., Kadivnik, Ž., Brajlih, T., Anderson, A., & Drstvenšek, I. (2013) · University of Maribor digital library (University of Maribor) · Cited by 60 · see citing works
Liljenhjerte, J., Upadhyaya, P., & Kumar, S. (2016) · Additive manufacturing · doi:10.1016/j.addma.2016.03.005 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citationBéguelin, P., & Kausch, H. H. (1994) · Journal of Materials Science · doi:10.1007/bf00356577 · Cited by 31 · see citing works
Tensile behaviour and fracture toughness of poly(ether ether ketone)/poly(ether imide) blends
Gensler, R., B�guelin, P., Plummer, C. J. G., et al. (1996) · Polymer Bulletin · doi:10.1007/bf00313826 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Pull-Out Performance of 3D Printed Composites with Embedded Fins on the Fiber
Liljenhjerte, J., & Kumar, S. (2015) · MRS Proceedings · doi:10.1557/opl.2015.645 · Cited by 14 · see citing works
Self-citationStick- Slip Instabilities in Fracture
Webb, T. W., & Aifantis, E. C. (1995) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-79654-8_219 · Cited by 11 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Fused filament fabrication of peek: A review of process-structure-property relationships
Zanjanijam, A. R., Major, I., Lyons, J. G., Lafont, U., & Devine, D. M. (2020) · Polymers · doi:10.3390/polym12081665 · Cited by 240 · see citing works
A comprehensive review of lunar-based manufacturing and construction
Azami, M., Kazemi, Z., Moazen, S., Dubé, M., Potvin, M.-J., & Skonieczny, K. (2024) · Progress in Aerospace Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.paerosci.2024.101045 · Cited by 57 · see citing works
El Magri, A., El Mabrouk, K., & Vaudreuil, S. (2021) · Journal of Materials Science · doi:10.1007/s10853-021-06172-x · Cited by 55 · see citing works
- Authors
- Arif, M. F., Kumar, S., Varadarajan, K. M., & Cantwell, W. J.
- Affiliations
- Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE)
- Harvard University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Kumar, S.
- Venue
- Materials & Design
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-05
- Volume
- 146
- Pages
- 249-259
- ISSN
- 0264-1275 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2793159194
- Cited by
- 296
- References
- 40
- Citations by year
- 2026: 14 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 54 · 2023: 36 · 2022: 45 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 7
- FWCI
- 14.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- eprints.gla.ac.uk
- Licence
- Locations
- Materials & Design (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- ENLIGHTEN (Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling Islam) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- Abu Dhabi Education Council (EX2016-000006)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Additive Manufacturing Materials and Processes
- Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Anatomy and Medical Technology
- Keywords
- PEEK, fused deposition modeling, tensile strength, flexural strength, fracture toughness, raster angle, build orientation, interlayer bonding, temperature gradient, fracture morphology, micro-computed tomography, orthopedic implants, biocompatible polymers
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
