The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Superhydrophobic and superoleophobic properties in nature
Open accessAbstract
In this review, we report on superhydrophobic and superoleophobic properties found in nature, which are strongly expected to benefit various potential applications. Mimicry of nature is the easiest way to reproduce such properties because nature has for millennia produced plants, insects and animals able to repel water as well as low surface tension liquids such as oils. The most famous example is the lotus leaf, but we may also consider insects able to walk on vertical surfaces or on the water surface , insects with colored structured wings or insects with antifogging and anti-reflective eyes. Most of the time, nature produces nanostructured waxes to obtain superhydrophobic properties. Very recently, the repellency of oils has been reported in springtails, for example. While several publications have reported the fabrication of superoleophobic surfaces using re-entrant geometry, in all of these publications fluorinated compounds were used because they have high hydrophobic properties but also relatively important oleophobic properties in comparison to hydrocarbon analogs even if they are intrinsically oleophilic. However, nature is not able to synthesize fluorinated compounds. In the case of the springtails, the surface structures consists of regular patterns with negative overhangs. The chemical composition of the cuticles is composed of three different layers: an inner cuticle layer made of a lamellar chitin skeleton with numerous pore channels, an epicuticular structures made of structural proteins such glycine (more than 50%), tyrosine and serine an the topmost envelope composed of lipids such as hydrocarbon acids and esters, steroids and terpenes. This discovery will help the scientific community to create superoleophobic materials without the use of fluorinated compounds.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Wettability of porous surfaces
Cassie, A. B. D., & Baxter, S. (1944) · Transactions of the Faraday Society · doi:10.1039/tf9444000546 · Cited by 13,807
RESISTANCE OF SOLID SURFACES TO WETTING BY WATER
Wenzel, R. N. (1936) · Industrial & Engineering Chemistry · doi:10.1021/ie50320a024 · Cited by 13,316
Evidence for self-cleaning in gecko setae
Hansen, W. R., & Autumn, K. (2005) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0408304102 · Cited by 601
Recent advances in the fabrication and adhesion testing of biomimetic dry adhesives
Sameoto, D., & Menon, C. (2010) · Smart Materials and Structures · doi:10.1088/0964-1726/19/10/103001 · Cited by 157
Cited by
Biological composites—complex structures for functional diversity
Eder, M., Amini, S., & Fratzl, P. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aat8297 · Cited by 426
Metadata
- Authors
- Darmanin, T., & Guittard, F.
- Venue
- Materials Today
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2015-06
- Volume
- 18
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 273-285
- ISSN
- 1369-7021 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2008404200
- Cited by
- 685
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 19.14
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Superhydrophobic and superoleophobic properties in nature. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.mattod.2015.01.001
- The paper
- Darmanin, T., & Guittard, F. (2015). Superhydrophobic and superoleophobic properties in nature. Materials Today. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mattod.2015.01.001
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.