Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 1,280

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Product selectivity of photocatalytic CO2 reduction reactions

Fu, Junwei, Jiang, Kexin, Qiu, Xiaoqing, Yu, Jiaguo, Liu, Min·2020·Materials Today

Abstract

Abstract Photocatalytic carbon dioxide (CO2) reduction to obtain hydrocarbon solar fuels is one of the promising strategies to solve energy crisis and complement carbon cycle. However, the low activity and poor product selectivity greatly limit its practical application. Tuning product selectivity is of great significance to improve the yield of target product and deepen the understanding of CO2 reduction reaction mechanism. In this review, we firstly summarize the widely accepted pathways of photocatalytic CO2 reduction reactions. Secondly, important factors affecting product selectivity are analyzed, mainly including light-excitation attributes, band structure of photocatalysts, separation of photogenerated charge carriers, adsorption/activation of reactants, surface active sites of catalytic reaction, and adsorption/desorption of intermediates. Finally, the challenges and perspectives in developing photocatalysts with high CO2 reduction efficiency and product selectivity are presented.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mattod.2019.06.009

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Cited by

See all 1,280

Metadata

Authors
Fu, J., Jiang, K., Qiu, X., Yu, J., & Liu, M.
Venue
Materials Today
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-01
Volume
32
Pages
222-243
ISSN
1369-7021 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2963049339
Cited by
1,280
References
6
FWCI
22.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.