Cited by 76Physical Activity and HealthDiabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and LipoproteinsCardiovascular and exercise physiology

Association of resistance exercise, independent of and combined with aerobic exercise, with the incidence of metabolic syndrome

Open access
Bakker, Esmée A., Lee, Duck-chul, Sui, Xuemei, Artero, Enrique G., Ruiz, Jonatan R., Eijsvogels, Thijs M.H., Lavie, Carl J., Blair, Steven N.·2017·Mayo Clinic Proceedings

Abstract

Objective To determine the association of resistance exercise, independent of and combined with aerobic exercise, with the risk of development of metabolic syndrome (MetS).Patients and methods The study cohort included adults (mean ± SD age, 46±9.5 years) who received comprehensive medical examinations at the Cooper Clinic in Dallas, Texas, between January 1, 1987, and December, 31, 2006. Exercise was assessed by self-reported frequency and minutes per week of resistance and aerobic exercise and meeting the US Physical Activity Guidelines (resistance exercise ≥2 d/wk; aerobic exercise ≥500 metabolic equivalent min/wk) at baseline. The incidence of MetS was based on the National Cholesterol Education Program Adult Treatment Panel III criteria. We used Cox regression to generate hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% CIs.Results Among 7418 participants, 1147 (15%) had development of MetS during a median follow-up of 4 years (maximum, 19 years; minimum, 0.1 year). Meeting the resistance exercise guidelines was associated with a 17% lower risk of MetS (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73-0.96; P=.009) after adjusting for potential confounders and aerobic exercise. Further, less than 1 hour of weekly resistance exercise was associated with 29% lower risk of development of MetS (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.56-0.89; P=.003) compared with no resistance exercise. However, larger amounts of resistance exercise did not provide further benefits. Individuals meeting both recommended resistance and aerobic exercise guidelines had a 25% lower risk of development of MetS (HR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.63-0.89; P<.001) compared with meeting neither guideline.Conclusion Participating in resistance exercise, even less than 1 hour per week, was associated with a lower risk of development of MetS, independent of aerobic exercise. Health professionals should recommend that patients perform resistance exercise along with aerobic exercise to reduce MetS.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mayocp.2017.02.018

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Observational studies suggest that combined exercise provides somewhat larger risk reductions in developing clinical endpoints such as metabolic syndrome, hypercholesterolaemia, obesity, and CVD morbidity and mortality.

    “Observational studies also suggest that combined exercise provides somewhat larger (although generally not statistically different compared with either resistance or aerobic exercise alone) risk reductions in developing clinical endpoints such as metabolic syndrome,33 hypercholesterolaemia,34 obesity,35 and CVD morbidity and mortality.36–38”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bakker, E. A., Lee, D.-C., Sui, X., Artero, E. G., Ruiz, J. R., Eijsvogels, T. M. H., Lavie, C. J., & Blair, S. N.
Affiliations
  • Radboud University Medical Center (NL)
  • Iowa State University (US)
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • University of Almería (ES)
  • Universidad de Granada (ES)
  • The University of Queensland (AU)
Corresponding author
Lee, Duck-chul
Venue
Mayo Clinic Proceedings
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-08
Volume
92
Issue
8
Pages
1214-1222
ISSN
0025-6196 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2625187122
Cited by
76
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 11 · 2022: 12 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 1
FWCI
7.08
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Mayo Clinic Proceedings (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Liverpool John Moores University (acceptedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Radboud Repository (Radboud University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute on Aging (R37AG006945, R01AG006945)
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01HL133069, R01HL062508)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R21DK088195)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Physical Activity and Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Complementary and alternative medicine › Cardiovascular and exercise physiology
Keywords
resistance training, aerobic exercise, metabolic syndrome, exercise recommendations, physical activity, metabolic syndrome incidence, concurrent training, exercise dose-response
MeSH terms
Female, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Male, Middle Aged, Risk Factors, Texas, Cohort Studies, Exercise, Incidence, Metabolic Syndrome, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review