Cited by 18Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormonesMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology ModelsAdvanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems

Dynamics and bifurcation of a model for hormonal control of the menstrual cycle with inhibin delay

Open access
Margolskee, Alison, Selgrade, James F.·2011·Mathematical Biosciences

Abstract

A system of 13 ordinary differential equations with 42 parameters is presented to model hormonal regulation of the menstrual cycle. For an excellent fit to clinical data, the model requires a 36 h time delay for the effect of inhibin on the synthesis of follicle stimulating hormone. Biological and mathematical reasons for this delay are discussed. Bifurcations with respect to changes in three important parameters are examined. One parameter represents the level of estradiol adequate for significant synthesis of luteinizing hormone. Bifurcation diagrams with respect to this parameter reveal an interval of parameter values for which a unique stable periodic solution exists and this solution represents a menstrual cycle during which ovulation occurs. The second parameter measures mass transfer between the first two stages of ovarian development and is indicative of healthy follicular growth. The third parameter is the time delay. Changes in the second parameter and the time delay affect the size of the uniqueness interval defined with respect to the first parameter. Saddle-node, transcritical and degenerate Hopf bifurcations are studied.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.mbs.2011.09.001

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • As with the previous works of Harris Clark et al. and Margolskee and Selgrade, the Wright et al. model only tracked inhibin A and did not incorporate inhibin B.

    “As with the previous works of Harris Clark et al. [41] and Margolskee and Selgrade [45], this model only tracked inhibin A and did not incorporate inhibin B.”

    From A Survey of Mathematical Modeling of Hormonal Contraception and the Menstrual Cycle (2024) · cites this paper as [45]

    The Auxiliary Equations (A), equation A3, model a single inhibin concentration, Inh, and equation S3 uses that concentration to inhibit FSH synthesis; there is no separate inhibin B variable. However, the paper calls this variable “Inh,” not “inhibin A,” so our copy does not establish that the model tracked inhibin A specifically. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Margolskee and Selgrade [45] fit their model to the data from the younger group in the Welt et al. data, but it is unclear how they handled the inhibin data as they did not distinguish inhibin A and inhibin B explicitly in their model.

    “Margolskee and Selgrade [45] also fit their model to the data from the younger group in the Welt et al. data, but it is unclear how they handled the inhibin data as they did not distinguish inhibin A and inhibin B explicitly in their model.”

    From A Survey of Mathematical Modeling of Hormonal Contraception and the Menstrual Cycle (2024) · cites this paper as [45]

    Section 3 says the delay model better approximates Welt et al.’s 28-day data, and the Figure 2 caption shows a single modeled inhibin measure, “Inh,” alongside Welt data points. The Introduction describes the data as coming from normally cycling women, but our copy does not identify it as the younger group or explain how inhibin A and B measurements were handled. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Margolskee and Selgrade found that the delays required for E2 and P4 were less than 1 day and could be set to zero.

    “Margolskee and Selgrade found that the delays required for E . 2 and P . 4 were less than 1 day and could be set to zero.”
  • The Wright et al. model extended the Margolskee and Selgrade and Harris Clark et al. models by adding autocrine mechanisms to describe how exogenous estrogen and progesterone could push a normal cycle into a contraceptive state.

    “The model extended the Margolskee and Selgrade [45] and Harris Clark et al. [41] models by adding autocrine mechanisms to describe how exogenous estrogen and progesterone could push a normal cycle into a contraceptive state.”
  • The models first developed by Selgrade, Schlosser, and Harris Clark stand out because they have been used as the foundation for a significant number of subsequent models.

    “Of this collection of modeling efforts, the models first developed by Selgrade, Schlosser, and Harris Clark [7, 8, 41, 42] stand out because they have been used as the foundation for a significant number of subsequent models [43-47].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. J. Keener and J. Sneyd (2009). Mathematical Physiology I: Cellular Physiology, Sec- ond Edition, New York: Springer-Verlag.
  2. J.E.A. McIntosh and R.P. McIntosh (1980). Mathematical Modeling and Computers in Endocrinology, Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
  3. W.D. Odell (1979). The reproductive system in women, Endocrinology, L.J. DeGroot (Ed), New York: Grune & Stratton, pp. 1383-1400.
  4. R.D. Pasteur (2008). A multiple-inhibin model for the human menstrual cycle, PhD thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina. Web site: http://www.lib.ncsu.edu/theses/available/etd-06102008-194807/

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Margolskee, A., & Selgrade, J. F.
Affiliations
North Carolina State University (US)
Corresponding author
Selgrade, James F.
Venue
Mathematical Biosciences
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
234
Issue
2
Pages
95-107
ISSN
0025-5564 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2127415102
Cited by
18
References
43
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.77
Type
journal article
Language
en
Locations
  • Mathematical Biosciences (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Funders
National Science Foundation (DMS-0920927)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Hypothalamic control of reproductive hormones
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Geometry and Topology › Advanced Differential Equations and Dynamical Systems
Keywords
menstrual cycle, hormonal regulation, inhibin, follicle-stimulating hormone, luteinizing hormone, estradiol, time delay, bifurcation analysis, Hopf bifurcation, transcritical bifurcation, saddle-node bifurcation, degenerate Hopf bifurcation, periodic solutions, ovulation, folliculogenesis, ovarian development
MeSH terms
Computer Simulation, Estradiol, Female, Follicle Stimulating Hormone, Ovarian Follicle, Humans, Inhibins, Menstrual Cycle, Models, Biological, Ovulation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review