Cited by 228Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and ApplicationsFunctional Brain Connectivity StudiesMedical Image Segmentation Techniques

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 66 of the 66 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tractometer: Towards validation of tractography pipelines

Abstract

We have developed the Tractometer: an online evaluation and validation system for tractography processing pipelines. One can now evaluate the results of more than 57,000 fiber tracking outputs using different acquisition settings (b-value, averaging), different local estimation techniques (tensor, q-ball, spherical deconvolution) and different tracking parameters (masking, seeding, maximum curvature, step size). At this stage, the system is solely based on a revised FiberCup analysis, but we hope that the community will get involved and provide us with new phantoms, new algorithms, third party libraries and new geometrical metrics, to name a few. We believe that the new connectivity analysis and tractography characteristics proposed can highlight limits of the algorithms and contribute in solving open questions in fiber tracking: from raw data to connectivity analysis. Overall, we show that (i) averaging improves quality of tractography, (ii) sharp angular ODF profiles helps tractography, (iii) seeding and multi-seeding has a large impact on tractography outputs and must be used with care, and (iv) deterministic tractography produces less invalid tracts which leads to better connectivity results than probabilistic tractography.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.media.2013.03.009

Cites

66 of 66 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 66 references

Research works printed but not linked: 9

  1. Garyfallidis, E., 2012. Toward an accurate brain tractography. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.
  2. Girard, G., Chamberland, M., Houde, J.C., Fortin, D., Descoteaux, M., 2012. Neurosurgical tracking at the Sherbrooke Connectivity Imaging Lab ( SCIL ). In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI’12) – DTI Challenge, Workshop, pp. 55–73.
  3. Girard, G., Descoteaux, M., 2012. Anatomical tissue probability priors for tractography. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer Assisted Intervention (MICCAI’12) – Computational Diffusion MRI, Workshop, pp. 174–185.
  4. Guevara, P., Duclap, D., Marrakchi-Kacem, L., Rivière, D., Cointepas, Y., Poupon, C., Mangin, J.F., 2011. Accurate tractography propagation mask using t1-weighted data rather than fa. In: Proceedings of the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, p. 2018.
  5. Poupon, C., Laribiere, L., Tournier, G., Bernard, J., Fournier, D., Fillard, P., Descoteaux, M., Mangin, J.F., 2010. A diffusion hardware phantom looking like a coronal brain slice. In: Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
  6. Smith, R.E., Tournier, J.D., Calamante, F., Connelly, A., 2012b. Structurally-informed tractography: improved diffusion MRI streamlines tractography using anatomical information. In: International Symposium on, Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM’12), p. 1907. · DOI · Paper page
  7. Tournier, J.D., Calamante, F., Connelly, A., 2011. Effect of step size on probabilistic streamlines: implications for the interpretation of connectivity analyses. In: International Symposium on Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM’11), p. 2019.
  8. Wilkins, B., Lee, N., Nam, K., Hwang, D., Singh, M., 2012a. Comparison of novel ICA-based approach to existing diffusion MRI multi-fiber reconstruction methods. In: International Symposium on Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM’12), p. 1934.
  9. Wilkins, B., Lee, N., Singh, M., 2012b. Development and evaluation of a simulated FiberCup phantom. in: International Symposium on Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM’12), p. 1938.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–228 of 228

Metadata

Authors
Côté, M.-A., Girard, G., Boré, A., Garyfallidis, E., Houde, J.-C., & Descoteaux, M.
Affiliations
Université de Sherbrooke (CA)
Corresponding author
Descoteaux, Maxime
Venue
Medical Image Analysis
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-10
Volume
17
Issue
7
Pages
844-857
ISSN
1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2013160622
Cited by
228
References
66
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 24 · 2016: 18 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 2
FWCI
11.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Medical Image Analysis (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Advanced Neuroimaging Techniques and Applications
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Medical Image Segmentation Techniques
Keywords
tractography, pipeline validation, connectivity analysis, diffusion MRI, spherical deconvolution, Q-ball imaging, seeding strategies, b-value, phantom evaluation
MeSH terms
Algorithms, Artificial Intelligence, Brain, Humans, Image Enhancement, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Nerve Fibers, Myelinated, Online Systems, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Sensitivity and Specificity, Software, Reproducibility of Results, Internet, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Diffusion Tensor Imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review