The DOI matches its Crossref record; 72 of the 72 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Landmark-based deep multi-instance learning for brain disease diagnosis
Open accessAbstract
HighlightsWe developed a novel deep multi‐instance convolutional neural network to automatically learn both local and global representations for MR images.We proposed a landmark‐based image patch extraction approach based on a data‐driven landmark discovery algorithm.We trained the model on ADNI‐1 and tested it on two independent datasets (i.e., ADNI‐2 and MIRIAD). Graphical abstract Figure. No Caption available. Abstract In conventional Magnetic Resonance (MR) image based methods, two stages are often involved to capture brain structural information for disease diagnosis, i.e., 1) manually partitioning each MR image into a number of regions‐of‐interest (ROIs), and 2) extracting pre‐defined features from each ROI for diagnosis with a certain classifier. However, these pre‐defined features often limit the performance of the diagnosis, due to challenges in 1) defining the ROIs and 2) extracting effective disease‐related features. In this paper, we propose a landmark‐based deep multi‐instance learning (LDMIL) framework for brain disease diagnosis. Specifically, we first adopt a data‐driven learning approach to discover disease‐related anatomical landmarks in the brain MR images, along with their nearby image patches. Then, our LDMIL framework learns an end‐to‐end MR image classifier for capturing both the local structural information conveyed by image patches located by landmarks and the global structural information derived from all detected landmarks. We have evaluated our proposed framework on 1526 subjects from three public datasets (i.e., ADNI‐1, ADNI‐2, and MIRIAD), and the experimental results show that our framework can achieve superior performance over state‐of‐the‐art approaches.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804441 · Cited by 56,601
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Friedman, J., & Tibshirani, R. (2001) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-21606-5 · Cited by 24,162
Tzourio-Mazoyer, N., Landeau, B., Papathanassiou, D., Crivello, F., Etard, O., Delcroix, N., Mazoyer, B., & Joliot, M. (2002) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0978 · Cited by 16,319
TensorFlow: Large-Scale Machine Learning on Heterogeneous Distributed Systems
Abadi, M., Agarwal, A., Barham, P., Brevdo, E., Chen, Z., Citro, C., Corrado, G. S., Davis, A., Dean, J., Devin, M., et al. (2016) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1603.04467 · Cited by 9,408
Robust Face Recognition via Sparse Representation
Wright, J., Yang, A. Y., Ganesh, A., Sastry, S. S., & Ma, Y. (2009) · IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1109/tpami.2008.79 · Cited by 9,388
Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 14: Proceedings of the 2001 Conference
(2002) · The MIT Press eBooks · doi:10.7551/mitpress/1120.001.0001 · Cited by 8,890
Voxel-Based Morphometry—The Methods
Ashburner, J., & Friston, K. J. (2000) · NeuroImage · doi:10.1006/nimg.2000.0582 · Cited by 8,676
Zhang, Y., Brady, M., & Smith, S. (2001) · IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging · doi:10.1109/42.906424 · Cited by 6,982
Measuring the thickness of the human cerebral cortex from magnetic resonance images
Fischl, B., & Dale, A. M. (2000) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.200033797 · Cited by 5,818
Comparison of the predicted and observed secondary structure of T4 phage lysozyme
Matthews, B. W. (1975) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Protein Structure · doi:10.1016/0005-2795(75)90109-9 · Cited by 5,399 · cited 3×
“…adopt seven metrics for performance evaluation, including receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, the area under ROC (AUC), accuracy (ACC), sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), F-Score, and Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC) ( Matthews, 1975 ) that is a balanced measure for binary classes.”
MethodInfluential
Cited by
An overview of deep learning in medical imaging focusing on MRI
Lundervold, A. S., & Lundervold, A. (2019) · Zeitschrift für Medizinische Physik · doi:10.1016/j.zemedi.2018.11.002 · Cited by 2,058
Zhou, S. K., Greenspan, H., Davatzikos, C., Duncan, J. S., Van Ginneken, B., Madabhushi, A., Prince, J. L., Rueckert, D., & Summers, R. M. (2021) · Proceedings of the IEEE · doi:10.1109/jproc.2021.3054390 · Cited by 1,118
Wen, J., Thibeau-Sutre, E., Diaz-Melo, M., Samper-González, J., Routier, A., Bottani, S., Dormont, D., Durrleman, S., Burgos, N., & Colliot, O. (2020) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2020.101694 · Cited by 809
Jo, T., Nho, K., & Saykin, A. J. (2019) · Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience · doi:10.3389/fnagi.2019.00220 · Cited by 724
A survey on active learning and human-in-the-loop deep learning for medical image analysis
Budd, S., Robinson, E. C., & Kainz, B. (2021) · Medical Image Analysis · doi:10.1016/j.media.2021.102062 · Cited by 606
Metadata
- Authors
- Liu, M., Zhang, J., Adeli, E., & Shen, D.
- Venue
- Medical Image Analysis
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-01
- Volume
- 43
- Pages
- 157-168
- ISSN
- 1361-8415 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2765366332
- Cited by
- 425
- References
- 72
- FWCI
- 22.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Landmark-based deep multi-instance learning for brain disease diagnosis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.media.2017.10.005
- The paper
- Liu, M., Zhang, J., Adeli, E., & Shen, D. (2018). Landmark-based deep multi-instance learning for brain disease diagnosis. Medical Image Analysis. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.media.2017.10.005
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.